Article published in:
Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 151180
References

References

Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aristar, Anthony R.
1997Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case markers. Studies in Language 21(2): 313–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blansitt, Edward L. Jr
1988Datives and allatives. In Studies in Syntactic Typology, Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds), 173–191. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1986Markedness, grammar, people, and the world. In Markedness, Fred R. Eckman, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds), 85–106. New York NY: Plenum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Mounole, Céline
2011Animacy and spatial cases: Typological tendencies, and the case of Basque. In Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 99], Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds), 157–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gair, James W. & Paolillo, John C.
1997Sinhala. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Ditransitive alignment splits and inverse alignment. Functions of Language 14: 79–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas & Ojutkangas, Krista
2006An introduction to Finnish spatial relations: Local cases and adpositions. In Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, Space and Person in Finnish [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 277], Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds), 11–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Mikä erottaa muodot sisällä ja sisässä? “Synonyymisten” muotojen analyysi (What is the difference between sisällä ‘in’ and sisässä ‘in’? An analysis of two “synonymous” forms). Sananjalka 52: 19–45.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2006On distinguishing between recipient and beneficiary in Finnish. In Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, Space and Person in Finnish [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 277], Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds), 129–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Animacy effects on differential goal marking. Linguistic Typology 12: 245–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Beneficiary coding in Finnish. In Benefactives and Malefactives: Typological Perspectives and Case Studies [Typological Studies in Language 92], Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds), 245–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Ylikoski, Jussi
2011Remarks on the coding of goal, recipient and vicinal goal in European Uralic. In Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 99], Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds), 29–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klavan, Jane, Kaisa Kesküla & Laura Ojava
2011The division of labour between synonymous locative cases and adpositions: The Estonian adessive and the adposition peal ‘on’. In Case, Animacy and Semantic roles, Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi and Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), 1134–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lauerma, Petri
1990Spatiaalinen kenttä (spatial tier). In Suomen kielen paikallissijat konseptuaalisessa semantiikassa (Finnish local cases in conceptual semantics), Pentti Leino, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, Petri Lauerma, Urpo Nikanne & Tiina Onikki (eds), 108–145. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2011The coding of spatial relations with human landmarks: From Latin to Romance. In Case, Animacy and Semantic roles [Typological Studies in Language 99], Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds), 209–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2003What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 114: 1186–1212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ojutkangas, Krista
2008Mihin suomessa tarvitaan sisä-grammeja (What for does Finnish need sisä- ‘inside’ grams). Virittäjä 112(3): 382–400.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2008The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally & Kabata, Kaori
2007Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative. Linguistic Typology 11: 451–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje
2011Ergativity and Aligment in Indo-Aryan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ghent.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Luraghi, Silvia
2017.  In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188],  pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2  pp. 567 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.