The (non-)prototypicality of Direction
The (allative and illative) case(s) of Finnish
The present paper examines the coding of Direction in Finnish. It will deal with both typical and less typical instances of Direction in light of features, such as animacy, size of the landmark and the nature of the reference to the landmark. The paper pursues two goals. First, it will show that the coding of Direction in Finnish is determined by markedness. In other words, the coding of Direction can be explained by referring to the typical vs. atypical nature of Direction (which depends on the landmark in question), and more importantly, canonical instances bear less elaborate coding than non-canonical instances. In so doing, the paper sheds more light on the semantic role of Direction, i.e. the question what the features are that should be considered in the studies dealing with Direction. Second, the paper aims at contributing to our understanding of the differences between cases and adpositions. Cases and adpositions unarguably share common features, and both of them can be used to express similar functions (such as coding of semantic roles). However, they differ crucially from each other as regards their use as markers of Direction, as already hinted at above. Keywords: Finnish; allative; illative; directional cases; markedness
References
Aissen, Judith
2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blansitt, Edward L. Jr
1988 Datives and allatives. In
Studies in Syntactic Typology,
Michael Hammond,
Edith Moravcsik &
Jessica Wirth (eds), 173–191. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
1986 Markedness, grammar, people, and the world. In
Markedness,
Fred R. Eckman,
Edith A. Moravcsik &
Jessica R. Wirth (eds), 85–106. New York NY: Plenum.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creissels, Denis
2008 Spatial cases. In
The Oxford Handbook of Case,
Andrej Malchukov &
Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creissels, Denis & Mounole, Céline
Dixon, Robert M.W
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gair, James W. & Paolillo, John C
1997 Sinhala. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with).
Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huumo, Tuomas & Ojutkangas, Krista
Huumo, Tuomas & Ojutkangas, Krista
2010 Mikä erottaa muodot sisällä ja sisässä? “Synonyymisten” muotojen analyysi (What is the difference between sisällä ‘in’ and sisässä ‘in’? An analysis of two “synonymous” forms).
Sananjalka 52: 19–45.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo
2008 Animacy effects on differential goal marking.
Linguistic Typology 12: 245–268.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo
2010 Beneficiary coding in Finnish. In
Benefactives and Malefactives: Typological Perspectives and Case Studies [
Typological Studies in Language 92],
Fernando Zúñiga &
Seppo Kittilä (eds), 245–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo & Ylikoski, Jussi
Klavan, Jane, Kaisa Kesküla & Laura Ojava
2011 The division of labour between synonymous locative cases and adpositions: The Estonian adessive and the adposition peal ‘on’. In
Case, Animacy and Semantic roles,
Seppo Kittilä,
Katja Västi and
Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), 1134–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lauerma, Petri
1990 Spatiaalinen kenttä (spatial tier). In
Suomen kielen paikallissijat konseptuaalisessa semantiikassa (
Finnish local cases in conceptual semantics),
Pentti Leino,
Marja-Liisa Helasvuo,
Petri Lauerma,
Urpo Nikanne &
Tiina Onikki (eds), 108–145. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Næss, Åshild
2003 What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects.
Lingua 114: 1186–1212.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ojutkangas, Krista
2008 Mihin suomessa tarvitaan sisä-grammeja (What for does Finnish need sisä- ‘inside’ grams).
Virittäjä 112(3): 382–400.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2008 The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity.
Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–167.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rice, Sally & Kabata, Kaori
2007 Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the allative.
Linguistic Typology 11: 451–514.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verbeke, Saartje
2011 Ergativity and Aligment in Indo-Aryan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ghent.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017.
<i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2
► pp. 567 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Tong Wu
2024.
On Italian spatial prepositions and measure phrases: reconciling the data with theoretical accounts.
Linguistics 62:2
► pp. 491 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.