Against the addressee of speech – Recipient metaphor
Evidence from East Caucasian
In Standard Average European (SAE), addressees of speech verbs are marked with dative or, in languages lacking cases, with dative-like prepositions. This merger is commonly explained through a metaphor: the information transferred in a speech act is said to be construed as the object being transferred, or Theme, and the addressee as its Recipient. This status of the addressee as a derived concept, a metaphor of the Recipient, and its dative marking in many languages rather than in SAE alone, is the reason why the addressee is usually not considered to be a separate semantic role. Based on data from East Caucasian languages that use different marking for Recipients and addressees of speech, I argue that speech addressees constitute a separate semantic role, also an animate Goal, but not a metaphor of the Recipient. Focusing on case marking assigned by the main speech verb, speech acts are shown to be construed in East Caucasian as spatial configurations: the crucial component is their directedness towards the addressee. In the conclusion, I come back to SAE and question the status of the dative addressees. Taking into account that the dative often develops from lative markers, it is suggested that, in the languages with dative addressees, one should also consider an alternative to the conventional explanation: merging the Recipient and the addressee in one marking may result not from a metaphorical extension but from formal under-specification of two different animate Goals. Keywords: semantic roles; speech verbs; case functions; metaphor; dative; allative; Recipient; Goal; East Caucasian languages
References (53)
Arkhipov, Alexandre, Daniel, Michael, Kibrik, Aleksandr & Sandro, Kodzasov
Unpublished.
Archi Electronic Corpus. An electronic collection of glossed texts. Partly available at
[URL].
Arkhipov, Alexandre, Daniel, Michael, Kibrik, Aleksandr & Sandro, Kodzasov
Unpublished.
Khinalug Electronic Corpus. Partly available at
[URL].
Authier, Gilles
2009 Grammaire Kryz, langue caucasique d’Azerbaïdjan, dialecte d’Alik. Leuven: Peeters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van den Berg, Helma
1995 A Grammar of Hunzib. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bokarev, Anatolij
1949 Očerki grammatiki čamalinskogo jazyka. Moscow – Leningrad: AN SSSR.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bokarev, Anatolij
1949 Sintaksis avarskogo jazyka. Moscow – Leningrad: AN SSSR.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charachidze, Georges
1981 Grammaire de la langue avar. Langue du Caucase Nord-Est. Paris: Dunod.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell & Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creissels, Denis
A Grammar of Akhvakh. Ms.
Creissels, Denis
In preparation.
Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective.
Cysouw, Michael & Diana, Forker
2009 Reconstruction of morphosyntactic function: Nonspatial usage of spatial case marking in Tsezic.
Language 85(3): 588–617.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, Ewa
1997 Cognitive Semantics and the Polish Dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daniel, Michael & Yuri, Lander
2011 The Caucasian languages. In
Bernd Kortmann &
Johan van der Auwera (eds.),
The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide, 125–158. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daniel, Michael & Dmitri, Ganenkov
2009 Case marking in Daghestanian. In
Andrej Malchukov &
Andrew Spencer (eds.),
Handbook of Case, 668–685. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daniel, Michael, Khalilova, Zaira & Zarina, Molochieva
2010 Ditransitive constructions in East Caucasian. In
Andrej Malchukov,
Martin Haspelmath &
Bernard Comrie (eds.),
Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comprehensive Handbook, 277–315. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David R
1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection.
Language 67: 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S
1986 Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative.
Language 62: 808–845.
[URL] DOI:
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J
1968 The case for case. In
Emmon Bach &
Robert T. Harms (eds.),
Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forker, Diana
2013 A Grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ganenkov, Dmitri, Lander, Yuri & Timur, Maisak
Unpublished.
Udi Electronic Corpus. An electronic collection of glossed texts.
Ganenkov, Dmitri, Maisak, Timur & Solmaz, Merdanova
Unpublished.
Agul Electronic Corpus. An electronic collection of glossed texts.
Ganenkov, Dmitry
2010 Topological relations in Daghestanian languages: An overview.
Linguistics 48(5): 1011–1041.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: UCP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gudava, Togo E
1967 Botlixskij jazyk. In Jazyki narodov SSSR, Vol. 4: Iberijsko-kavkazskije jazyki, 293–306. Moscow: AN SSSR.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Tania, Kuteva
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janda, Laura
1993 A Geography of Case Semantics: The Czech Dative and the Russian Instrumental. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khalilova, Zaira
2009 A Grammar of Khwarshi. Utrecht: LOT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr & Jakov, Testelets
(eds) 1999 Elementy caxurskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii. Moscow: Nasledie.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr
(ed.) 1996 Godoberi [
Lincom Studies in Caucasian Linguistics 02] Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr, Kazenin, Konstantin, Ljutikova, Ekaterina & Sergej, Tatevosov
(eds) 2001 Bagvalinskij jazyk: Grammatika, teksty, slovari. Moscow: Nasledie.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr, Kodzasov, Sandro & Irina, Olovjannikova
1972 Fragmenty grammatiki xinalugskogo jazyka. Moscow: Moscow State University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr
1977 Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka. Vol. 2. Moscow: Moscow State University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr
2003a Konstanty i peremennyje jazyka. St. Petersburg: Aleteia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr
2003b Nominal inflection galore: Daghestanian, with side glances at Europe and the world. In
Frans Plank (ed.),
Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe, 37–112. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Malka, Rappoport Hovav
2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magomedova, Patimat T
2003 Tindinkso-russkij slovarj. Maxačkala: Institute of Language and Literature(Russian Academy of Sciences).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magometov, Aleksandr
1965 Tabasaranskij jazyk. (Issledovanija i teksty). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magometov, Aleksandr
1982 Megebskij dialect darginskogo jazyka. (Issledovanija i teksty). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Makhmudova, Svetlana
2001 Morfologija rutul’skogo jazyka. Moscow: IJa RAN.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej, Hartmann, Iren, Haspelmath, Martin, Comrie, Bernard & Søren, Wichmann
(eds.) In preparation
Valency Classes in the World’s Languages
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin & Bernard, Comrie
2010 Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In
Andrej Malchukov,
Martin Haspelmath &
Bernard Comrie,
Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: Comparative Handbook, 1–64. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molochieva, Zarina, Witzlack-Makrevich, Alena, Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna, Nichols
Unpublished.
Chechen Pears Stories Collection. Electronic Corpus. University of Leipzig & University of Berkeley.
Musaev, Magomed-Salam
1999 Darginskij jazyk. In Jazyki mira: Kavkazskije jazyki. Moscow: Nauka.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nichols, Johanna
2011 Ingush Grammar [
UC Publications in Linguistics]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pasquereau, Jérémy
2010 Formes spatiales des noms en karata: Emplois spatiaux et non-spatiaux. Lyon: University of Lyon dissertation(Memoire de master 1).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salimov, Hangerej S
2010 Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo jazyka. Maxačkala: Institute of Language and Literature(Russian Academy of Sciences).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sumbatova, Nina & Rasul, Mutalov
2003 A Grammar of Icari Dargwa [
Languages of the World, Materials 92]. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talibov, Bukar
2007 Buduxskij jazyk. Moscow: Academia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Testelets, Jakov
1980 Imennyje lokativnyje formy v dagestanskix jazykax. Moscow: Moscow State University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert
2005 Exploring the Syntax-semantic Interface. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Žirkov, Lev
1955 Lakskij jazyk: Fonetika i morfologija. Moscow: AN SSSR.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017.
<i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2
► pp. 567 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.