Cover not available
Part of
The Linguistics of Temperature
Edited by Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Typological Studies in Language 107] 2015
► pp. 254–299

What’s hot and what’s not in English and Serbian

A contrastive view on the polysemy of temperature adjectives

This paper explores the polysemy of English and Serbian temperature adjectives from a cognitive linguistic perspective. After a global overview of the adjectival categorisation of the temperature domain in the two languages, the pertinent semantic extensions are analysed and compared with regard to their underlying conceptual motivations. English and Serbian are found to display a high degree of similarity in their overall metaphorical conceptualisation based on the temperature domain, but also significant intra- and cross-linguistic variation and dynamism in the semantic extensions along the temperature continuum. The paper discusses multifaceted aspects of temperature-based metaphorical conceptualisation (qualitative and quantitative aspects, energy transfer, transitive cross-domain mappings etc.) and ways in which the extended meanings of temperature adjectives bear on their overall semantics in the two languages.
Published online: 11 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.107.09ras
References (46)
References
Apresjan, Juri. 2000. Systematic Lexicography. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Valentina & Apresjan, Juri. 1993. Metafora v semantičeskom predstavlenii emocij. (Metaphor in the semantic representation of emotions) Voprosy jazykoznanija 3: 27–35.Google Scholar
Asch, Solomon. 1946. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41: 258-290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayduk, Ozlem, Mischel, Walter & Downey, Geraldine. 2002. Attentional mechanisms linking rejection to hostile reactivity: The role of “hot” versus “cool” focus. Psychological Science 13(5): 443-448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergström, Annika. 2010. Temperatur i språk och tanke. En jämförande semantisk studie av svenska temperaturadjektiv (Temperature in language and mind. A comparative semantic study of temperature adjectives in Swedish). PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Browne, Wayles. 2002. Serbo-Croat. In The Slavonic Languages, Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 306-387. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cruse, David Alan & Togia, Pagona. 1995. Towards a cognitive model of antonymy. Journal of Lexicology 1: 113-141.Google Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 1999. Metaphorical polysemy and paradigmatic relations: A corpus study. Word 50: 319-338.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Мark. 2002. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1957. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Grondelaers, Stefan. 1995. Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds), 153-179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Hawkesworth, Celia. 2006. Serbian-Croatian-Bosnian linguistic complex. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 258-260. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Christopher. 1997. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. In Cultural, Typological and Psychological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 152], Masako K. Hiraga, Chris Sinha & Sherman Wilcox (eds), 155-169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleparsky, Grzegorz. 2007. Hot pants, cold fish and cool customers: In search of historical metaphorical extensions in the realm of temperature terms. Studia Anglica Resoviensia 4: 100-118. ZESZYT 47/2007.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2007. Guidelines for collecting linguistic expressions for temperature concepts, Version 1. <[URL]> (25 August 2010).
. 2011. “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik, Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 393-410. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 2006. "Some like it hot": On the semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. STUF (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung) 59(2): 253-269. Special issue The Lexicon: Typological and Contrastive Perspectives, Giannoula Giannoulopoulou & Torsten Leuschner (eds).Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Kövecses, Zoltán. 1987. The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Dorothy Holland & Naomi Quinn (eds), 195-221. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1970. Static and dynamic elements in semantics: Hot, warm, cool, cold . Research on Language and Social Interaction 3(2): 349-374.Google Scholar
. 1990. Polysemy, conventionality and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics 1(2): 207-246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzetti, Maria Ivana. 2009. “That girl is hot, her dress is so cool, and I'm just chilling out now”: Emergent metaphorical usages of temperature terms in English and Italian. Paper presented at the Corpus-Based Approaches to Figurative Language Colloquium, Liverpool, UK, July 2009. <[URL]> (9 November 2010).
MacAdams, Lewis. 2001. Birth of the Cool: Beat, Bebop, and the American Avant-Garde. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, Janet & Mischel, Walter. 1999. A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review 106: 3-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Robert L. 2004. We’re cool, mom and dad are swell: Basic slang and generational shifts in values. American Speech 79(1): 59-86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, Srini.2008. The thermal qualities of substance: A cross-cultural account. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Science (CogSci 2008), Chicago. <[URL]> (15 September 2010).
Piper, Predrag, Antonić, Ivana, Ružić, Vladislava, Tanasić, Sreto, Popović, Ljudmila & Tošović, Branko. 2005. Sintaksa savremenoga srpskog jezika (Syntax of the contemporary Serbian language). Beograd: Institut za srpski jezik SANU, Beogradska knjiga, Matica srpska.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2003. Temperature talk: The basics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Lexical Typology at the ALT Conference in Cagliari, 15–18 September. <[URL]> (5 September 2010).
. 2010. Temperature talk: The basics revisited. Paper presented at the Temperature in Language and Cognition Workshop, 19-20 March, Stockholm University. <[URL]> (10 September 2010).
Plank, Frans, Nemati, Fatemeh & Spagnol, Michael. 2010. Designations for in-between grades and stages, with particular reference to rising and falling temperature. Paper presented at the Temperature in Language and Cognition Workshop , March, Stockholm University. <[URL]> (5 October 2010).
Pountain, Dick & Robins, David. 2000. Cool Rules: Anatomy of an Attitude. London: Reaktion Book.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Seymour, Nelson, Carnot & Vivekananthan, P.S. 1968. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 283-294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shindo, Mika. 2009. Semantic Extension, Subjectification, and Verbalization. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
. 2010. Subdivisions of temperature concepts. Paper presented at the Temperature in Language and Cognition Workshop, Stockholm University, 19–20 March. <[URL]> (20 September 2010).
Sutrop, Urmas. 1998. Basic temperature terms and subjective temperature scale. Lexicology 4(1): 60-104.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1989. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
WALS 2008. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. <[URL]> (20 October 2010).Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph M. 1976. Synaesthetic adjectives: A possible law of semantic change. Language 52(2): 461-478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Lawrence E. & Bargh, John A. 2008. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322(5901): 606-607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Chen-Bo & Leonardelli, Geoffrey J. 2008. Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science 19(9): 838 -842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2022. Chapter 8. Talking temperature with close relatives. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Vanhove, Martine & Mohamed-Tahir Hamid Ahmed
2021. Olfactory, gustatory and tactile perception in Beja (North-Cushitic). In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.