Cover not available
Part of
The Linguistics of Temperature
Edited by Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Typological Studies in Language 107] 2015
► pp. 300–332

In the warmth of the Ukrainian temperature domain

This paper aims to outline the temperature domain as it is lexicalised in the Ukrainian language. The temperature domain will be considered in relation to the semantic and morphosyntactic features of temperature terms, their collocational patterns as well as their semantic extensions. This analysis is carried out from the perspective of a Ukrainian world view. It also seeks to address the gradability of temperature intensity which is variably realised across the temperature domain. On the one hand, this variation is rooted in the phenomenological nature of temperature, which is conceptualised via different frames of reference; on the other, it is evaluated diversely as defined by socio-cultural norms.
Published online: 11 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.107.10kry
References (25)
References
Carlson-Radvansky, Laura A. & Irwin, David E. 1993. Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition 46: 223–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Corbett, Greville G. 2002. The Slavonic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fourman, Vitalij V. 2001. Meteorolohija i klimatolohija (Meteorology and Climatology). L'viv: Ivan Franko National University. <[URL]> (9 December 2010).Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Grondelaers, Stefan. 1995. Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, John R. Taylor & Robert E. MacLaury (eds), 153–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. Preface. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds), v-viii. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael. 2005. Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds), 285-311. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2007. Guidelines for collecting linguistic expressions for temperature concepts, Version 1. <[URL]> (24 October 2010)
. 2011. “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens: Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik. Peter Koch zum 60. Geburtstag, Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 393–410. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina. 2006. “Some like it hot”: On the semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. STUF (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung) 59(2): 253-269. Special issue The Lexicon: Typological and Contrastive Perspectives, Giannoula Giannoulopoulou & Torsten Leuschner (eds).Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2006. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Budapest: Loránd Eötvös University.Google Scholar
Kravtsiv, Bohdan. 1984. Folk calendar. In The Encyclopaedia of Ukraine, Vol. 1., (n.d.; rev. ed. by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto). <[URL]> (20 November 2010).
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne J. 2002. Paradigmatic relations of exclusion and opposition, I: Gradable antonymy and complementarity. In Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen. D. Alan Cruse, Franz Hundsnurscher, Michael Job & Peter Rolf Lutzeier (eds), 498–507. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, Srini. 2008. The thermal qualities of substance: A cross-cultural study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Science (CogSci 2008), Chicago. <[URL]>
Plank, Frans. 2003. Temperature talk: The basics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Lexical Typology at the ALT conference in Cagliari, September.
Popova, Yanna. 2005. Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds), 395–419. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pugh, Stefan M. & Press, Ian. 1999. Ukrainian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Cubberley, Paul V. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Young, Steven R. 2006. Ukrainian. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Keith Brown (ed.), 13:212. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2022. Chapter 8. Talking temperature with close relatives. In The Typology of Physical Qualities [Typological Studies in Language, 133], ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Vanhove, Martine & Mohamed-Tahir Hamid Ahmed
2021. Olfactory, gustatory and tactile perception in Beja (North-Cushitic). In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.