Article published in:The Linguistics of Temperature
Edited by Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
[Typological Studies in Language 107] 2015
► pp. 889–916
The syntax of temperature predications
The syntactic structures encountered in clauses containing temperature concepts tend to differ from the ones employed in standard intransitive clause types. These constructions are remarkable not only because of their unusual internal makeup, but also because of the great variety in syntactic patterns they exhibit. However, despite the considerable variety in the structure of temperature clauses, identical or near-identical temperature constructions recur in languages around the world with amazing regularity. The present study seeks to explore the reasons for the variety in the structure of temperature predications, as well as the reasons for the frequent recurrence of similar or identical construction types at the cross-linguistic level. The conclusion drawn from the available data is that both phenomena are due to cognitive principles, which allow varying construals of temperature events, but which, because of the universality of these principles, also limit the conceptualization of temperature events to a specific set of possible construals.
Published online: 11 February 2015
Aikhenvald, Alexandra, Dixon, Robert M.W. & Onishi, Masayuki
Bassène, Alain-Christian & Creissels, Denis
2011 Impersonal constructions in Jóola-Banjal. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), Impersonal Constructions. A Cross- Linguistic Perspective, 285-306.
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Kamuri Venkata
2004 The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 1, Non-nominative Subjects, 77–112.
Eriksen, Pål, Kittilä, Seppo & Kolehmainen, Leena
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo
2011a Expressions for physical and mental states in the Circum-Mediterranean languages: Contact-induced and/or autonomous parallelisms? Workshop on Gradualness in Change and its Relation to Synchronic Variation and Use, University of Pavia.
2001 Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects, 149-176.
Hopper, Paula & Thompson, Sandra A.
Jacobson, Steven A.
2004 The possessor-experiencer dative in Malayalam. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 1, Non-nominative Subjects, 227-244.
Keenan, Edward L.
2011 “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik, Sarah Dessí Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 379-96. Tübingen: Narr.
Macdonald, Roderick Ross & Darjowidjojo, Soenjono
Malchukov, Andrej & Ogawa, Akio
2011 Towards a typology of impersonal constructions. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), Impersonal Constructions. A Cross- Linguistic Perspective, 19-56.
Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna
Mettouchi, Amina & Tosco, Mauro
2011 Impersonal configurations and theticity: The case of meteorological predications in Afroasiatic. In Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), Impersonal Constructions. A Cross- Linguistic Perspective, 307-322.
2004b Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 2, Non-nominative Subjects, 33-56.
2004 Instrumental subjects in Motuna. In Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 2, Non-nominative Subjects, 83-101.
Ross, Malcolm D.
Sands, Kristina & Campbell, Lyle
2001 Non-canonical subjects and objects in Finnish. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects, 307-354.
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fé T.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., í Lon Jacobsen, Jógvan & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo
Watkins, Laurel J.