The syntax of temperature predications
The syntactic structures encountered in clauses containing temperature concepts tend to differ from the ones employed in standard intransitive clause types. These constructions are remarkable not only because of their unusual internal makeup, but also because of the great variety in syntactic patterns they exhibit. However, despite the considerable variety in the structure of temperature clauses, identical or near-identical temperature constructions recur in languages around the world with amazing regularity. The present study seeks to explore the reasons for the variety in the structure of temperature predications, as well as the reasons for the frequent recurrence of similar or identical construction types at the cross-linguistic level. The conclusion drawn from the available data is that both phenomena are due to cognitive principles, which allow varying construals of temperature events, but which, because of the universality of these principles, also limit the conceptualization of temperature events to a specific set of possible construals.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra, Dixon, Robert M.W. & Onishi, Masayuki
Asher, Ronald E. & Kumari, T.C
1997 Malayalam. London: Routledge.

Bassène, Alain-Christian & Creissels, Denis
2011 Impersonal constructions in Jóola-Banjal. In
Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), 285-306.
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Kamuri Venkata
Bickel, B
2004 The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In
Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 1, 77–112.
Einarsson, Stefan
1945 Icelandic: Grammar, Texts, Glossary. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins.

Eriksen, Pål, Kittilä, Seppo & Kolehmainen, Leena
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo
2011a Expressions for physical and mental states in the Circum-Mediterranean languages: Contact-induced and/or autonomous parallelisms? Workshop on Gradualness in Change and its Relation to Synchronic Variation and Use, University of Pavia.
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo
2011b Experiental constructions in the Circum- Mediterranean area. In
Structures and Meanings: Cross-theoretical Perspectives,
Maria Frascarelli (ed.), 21-37. Torino: L’Harmattan.

Hermon, Gabriella
2001 Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In
Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 149-176.
Hopper, Paula & Thompson, Sandra A
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language 56: 251-99.


Jacobson, Steven A
1995 A Practical Grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo Language. Fairbanks AK: University of Alaska.

Jayaseelan, K.A
2004 The possessor-experiencer dative in Malayalam. In
Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 1, 227-244.
Keenan, Edward L
1976 Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In
Subject and Topic,
Charles Li (ed.), 249-301. New York NY: Academic Press.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2011 “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In
Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik,
Sarah Dessí Schmid,
Ulrich Detges,
Paul Gévaudan,
Wiltrud Mihatsch &
Richard Waltereit (eds), 379-96. Tübingen: Narr.

Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju & Gwynn, John Peter Lucius
1985 A Grammar of Modern Telugu. Delhi: OUP.

Langacker, Ronald
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.1. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Macdonald, Roderick Ross & Darjowidjojo, Soenjono
1967 A Students’ Reference Grammar of Modern Formal Indonesian. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Malchukov, Andrej & Ogawa, Akio
2011 Towards a typology of impersonal constructions. In
Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), 19-56.
Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna
Mazur, Boleslaw W
20012.
Colloquial Polish. The Complete Course for Beginners. London: Routledge.

Mettouchi, Amina & Tosco, Mauro
2011 Impersonal configurations and theticity: The case of meteorological predications in Afroasiatic. In
Malchukov & Siewierska (eds), 307-322.
Montaut, Annie
2004a A Grammar of Hindi. Munich: Lincom.

Montaut, Annie
2004b Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. In
Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 2, 33-56.
Onishi, Masayoshi
2004 Instrumental subjects in Motuna. In
Bhaskararao & Subbarao (eds), Vol. 2, 83-101.
Ross, Malcolm D
1996 Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In
The Comparative Method Reviewed. Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change,
Mark D. Durie &
Malcolm D. Ross (eds), 180-217. Oxford: OUP.

Sands, Kristina & Campbell, Lyle
2001 Non-canonical subjects and objects in Finnish. In
Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 307-354.
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fé T
1972 Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

The Christian Brothers
1965 New Irish Grammar. Dublin: Fallons.

Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., í Lon Jacobsen, Jógvan & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo
2004 Faroese: An Overview and Reference Grammar. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag.

Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & La Polla, Randy
1997 Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.


Watkins, Laurel J
. (with the assistance of Parker McKenzie)
1984 A Grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.

Wendt, Heinz F
19996.
Langenscheidt’s Taschenwörterbuch Türkisch. Berlin: Langenscheidt.

Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2022.
Semantic maps and temperature: Capturing the lexicon-grammar interface across languages.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1
► pp. 125 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.