Cover not available
Part of
Negation in Uralic Languages
Edited by Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm and Beáta Wagner-Nagy
[Typological Studies in Language 108] 2015
► pp. 1–42

Negation in Uralic languages – Introduction

| University of Helsinki
| Central European University and Károli Gáspár University of the Hungarian Reformed Church
| University of Hamburg
Published online: 24 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.108.01int
References (89)
References
Ackerman, Farrell & Nikolaeva, Irina. 2013. Descriptive Typology and Linguistics Theory: A Study in the Morphosyntax of Relative Clauses. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2010. On the diachrony of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 73–101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Lejeune, Ludo (with Valentin Goussev). 2005. The prohibitive. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 290–293. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bakró-Nagy, Marianne 2006. Az uráli nyelvek tipológiai jellemzése (The typological characterization of Uralic languages). In Magyar nyelv, Ferenc Kiefer & Péter Siptár (eds), 267–287. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
. 2012. The Uralic languages. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 90: 1001–1028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bereczki, Gábor. 1974. Sushchestvovala li pravolzhskaja obshchnost’ finno-ugrov? (Was there a pre-Volgaic stage in the development of Finno-Ugric languages?). Acta Linguistica Hungarica 24: 81–85.Google Scholar
Bowden, John. 1997. Taba (Makian Dalam): Description of an Austronesian Language from Eastern Indonesia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Chamoreau, Claudine. 2000. Grammaire du purépecha [Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 34]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Churchward, C. Maxwell. 1953. Tongan Grammar. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Negation and other verb categories in the Uralic languages. In Congressus Quintus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Vol. VI, Osmo Ikola (ed.), 350–355. Turku: Suomen Kielen Seura.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen. 1989. Discourse Pragmatics and Semantic Categorization: The Case of Negation and Tense-Aspect with Special Reference to Swahili [Discourse Perspectives on Grammar 1]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornyn, William. 1944. Outline of Burmese grammar [Language Dissertation 38. Supplement to Language 20(4)]. Baltimore MD: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Typology of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 9–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donner, Otto. 1879. Die gegenseitige Verwandtschaft der finnisch-ugrischen Sprachen [Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae 11]. Helsingfors: Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2005. Negative morphemes. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2011a. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 143. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
. 2011b. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 144. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1995. Discourse-Configurational Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1998. Discourse-configurationality in the languages of Europe. In Constituent order in the Languages of Europe, Anna Siewierska (ed.), 681–729. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2010. Linguistic typology and language documentation. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Pål Kristian. 2011. 'To not be' or not 'to not be': The typology of negation of non-verbal predicates. Studies in Language 35 (2): 275–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1978. Negation in language: Pragmatics, function, ontology. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 69–112. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gyarmathi, Sámuel. 1799. Affinitas linguae hungaricae cum linguis fennicae originis grammatice demonstrata. Göttingen.
Hajdú, Péter. 1985. The main characteristic features of the Uralic languages. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 33: 101–112.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Jaakko. 2013. Historiallisen kielitieteen vertailevat menetelmät (The comparative methods of historical linguistics). In Kielten vertailun metodiikkaa, Leena Kolehmainen, Matti Miestamo & Taru Nordlund (eds), 171–218. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 466–469. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen. 1995. Proto-Uralic gradation: Continuation and traces. In Congressus Octavus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Pars I: Orationes plenariae et conspectus quinquennales, 17–51. Jyväskylä.
Hoeksema, Jack. 2010. Negative and positive polarity items: An investigation of the interplay of lexical meaning and global conditions on expression. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 187–224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack, Rullmann, Hotze, Sánchez-Valencia, Victor & Van Der Wouden, Ton (eds). 2001. Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honti László. 1997. Die Negation im Uralischen I–III. Linguistica Uralica 33: 81–96, 161–176, 241–252.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2010. A nyelvrokonságról. Az török, sumer és egyéb áfium ellen való orvosság (On the genetic relatedness of languages: Debunking the Turkic, Sumerian and other myths). Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence & Kato, Yasuhiko (eds). 2000. Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 2009. Proto-Uralic: What, where, and when? In The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 257], Jussi Ylikoski (ed.), 57–78. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Kahrel, Peter 1996. Aspects of Negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Kimball, Geoffrey D. 1991. Koasati Grammar. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2001. Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 111: 315–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehn, Edward & Koehn, Sally. 1986. Apalai. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 33–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Michael 1992. The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68: 4–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Johanna. 2010. Contact and the Finno-Ugric Languages. In The Handbook of Language Contact [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], Raymond Hickey (ed.), 598–617. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 1997. Demonstratives in Interaction: The Emergence of a Definite Article in Finnish [Studies in Discourse Grammar 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1965. The function of quantity in Finnish and Estonian. Language 41: 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2004. Suomen kieltoverbikonstruktio typologisessa valossa (A typological perspective on the Finnish negative verb construction). Virittäjä 108(3): 364–388.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 462–465. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. Negation. In Handbook of Pragmatics: The 2006 Installment, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Negation – An overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 552–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54], Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 63–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. Paris: UNESCO. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, Igor. 1994. Evenki. In Typological Studies in Negation [Typological Studies in Language 29], Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sajnovics, János. 1770. Demonstratio idioma Ungarorum et Lapponum idem esse. Hafniae: Salicath.Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani. 2002. Problems in the taxonomy of the Uralic languages in the light of modern comparative studies. In Lingvističeskij bespredel: sbornikstatek k 70-letiju А. I. Kuznecovoj, 44–55. Moskva: Izd. Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1988. Historical phonology of the Uralic languages with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric and Permic. In Uralic languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Denis Sinor (ed.), 478–554. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1997. Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R.C. 1969. Bagirmi grammar [Linguistic Monograph Series 3]. Khartoum: Sudan Research Unit, University of Khartoum.Google Scholar
Tauli, Valter. 1963. Structural Tendencies in Uralic Languages [Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series 17.] The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tamm, Anne. 2011a. Cross-categorial spatial case in the Finnic nonfinite system: Focus on the absentive TAM semantics and pragmatics of the Estonian inessive m-formative nonfinites. Linguistics 49(4): 835–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. The case of Nincstelenek (‘the destitute’): Nounless and verbless in the Uralic grammar. In Proceedings of Congressus XI Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum: Piliscsaba, Hungary, August 9–14, 2010, Sándor Csúcs, Nóra Falk, Viktória Tóth & Gábor Zaicz (eds), 270–276. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.Google Scholar
. 2014. The partitive concept versus linguistic partitives: From abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54], Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 89–151. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Brattico, Pauli. 2014. The Finnish accusative: Long-distance case assignment under agreement. Linguistics 52(1): 73–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Der Wouden, Ton. 1997. Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba. 2013. Negative existentials: A cross-linguistic study. Rivista di linguistica 25(1): 107–145.Google Scholar
References
van der Auwera, Johan & Lejeune, Ludo (with Valentin Goussev). 2005. The prohibitive. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 290–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈[URL]〉]Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Negative morphemes. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈[URL]〉]Google Scholar
. 2011a. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 143. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
. 2011b. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 144. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈[URL]〉Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastassia. 2007. N-words and negative concord, In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 466–469. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈[URL]〉]Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1978. Remarks on neg-raising In Syntax and Semantics vol. 9. Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 129–220. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2005a. Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Symmetric and asymmetric standard negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 458–461. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈[URL]〉]Google Scholar
. 2005c. Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 462–465. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈[URL]〉]Google Scholar
. 2007. Negation – an overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (5): 552–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol I, Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rédei, Károly. 1978. Syrjänische Chrestomathie. Mit Grammatik und Glossar [Studia Uralica 1]. Wien: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Lindström, Liina, Maarja-Liisa Pilvik & Helen Plado
2021. Variation in negation in Seto. Studies in Language 45:3 ► pp. 557 ff. DOI logo
Shor, Leon
2020. Chapter 16. Negation in Modern Hebrew. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 583 ff. DOI logo
Krasnoukhova, Olga & Johan van der Auwera
2019. Standard negation in Awa Pit: From synchrony to diachrony. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2 ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
de Groot, Casper
2017. Chapter 1. Discovering the assignment. In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
de Groot, Casper
2017. Chapter 21. The typology of the essive in the Uralic Languages. In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119], ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.