Article published in:
Negation in Uralic Languages
Edited by Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm and Beáta Wagner-Nagy
[Typological Studies in Language 108] 2015
► pp. 142
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

de Groot, Casper
2017.  In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
de Groot, Casper
2017.  In Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State [Typological Studies in Language, 119],  pp. 497 ff. Crossref logo
Shor, Leon
2020.  In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210],  pp. 583 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Nikolaeva, Irina
2013Descriptive Typology and Linguistics Theory: A Study in the Morphosyntax of Relative Clauses. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2010Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2010On the diachrony of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 73–101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Lejeune, Ludo (with Valentin Goussev
) 2005The prohibitive. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 290–293. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bakró-Nagy, Marianne
2006Az uráli nyelvek tipológiai jellemzése (The typological characterization of Uralic languages). In Magyar nyelv, Ferenc Kiefer & Péter Siptár (eds), 267–287. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
2012The Uralic languages. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 90: 1001–1028. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bereczki, Gábor
1974Sushchestvovala li pravolzhskaja obshchnost’ finno-ugrov? (Was there a pre-Volgaic stage in the development of Finno-Ugric languages?). Acta Linguistica Hungarica 24: 81–85.Google Scholar
Bowden, John
1997Taba (Makian Dalam): Description of an Austronesian Language from Eastern Indonesia. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Chamoreau, Claudine
2000Grammaire du purépecha [Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 34]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Churchward, C. Maxwell
1953Tongan Grammar. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Negation and other verb categories in the Uralic languages. In Congressus Quintus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Vol. VI, Osmo Ikola (ed.), 350–355. Turku: Suomen Kielen Seura.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen
1989Discourse Pragmatics and Semantic Categorization: The Case of Negation and Tense-Aspect with Special Reference to Swahili [Discourse Perspectives on Grammar 1]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornyn, William
1944Outline of Burmese grammar [Language Dissertation 38. Supplement to Language 20(4)]. Baltimore MD: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1979Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Typology of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 9–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donner, Otto
1879Die gegenseitige Verwandtschaft der finnisch-ugrischen Sprachen [Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae 11]. Helsingfors: Societatis Scientiarum Fennicae.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
2005Negative morphemes. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2011aOrder of negative morpheme and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 143. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/143Google Scholar
2011bPosition of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 144. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/144Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1995Discourse-Configurational Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1998Discourse-configurationality in the languages of Europe. In Constituent order in the Languages of Europe, Anna Siewierska (ed.), 681–729. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2010Linguistic typology and language documentation. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Pål Kristian
2011'To not be' or not 'to not be': The typology of negation of non-verbal predicates. Studies in Language 35 (2): 275–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1978Negation in language: Pragmatics, function, ontology. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 69–112. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1984Syntax: A Functional-typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gyarmathi, Sámuel
1799Affinitas linguae hungaricae cum linguis fennicae originis grammatice demonstrata. Göttingen.
Hajdú, Péter
1985The main characteristic features of the Uralic languages. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 33: 101–112.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Jaakko
2013Historiallisen kielitieteen vertailevat menetelmät (The comparative methods of historical linguistics). In Kielten vertailun metodiikkaa, Leena Kolehmainen, Matti Miestamo & Taru Nordlund (eds), 171–218. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2005Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 466–469. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen
1995Proto-Uralic gradation: Continuation and traces. In Congressus Octavus Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Pars I: Orationes plenariae et conspectus quinquennales, 17–51. Jyväskylä.
Hoeksema, Jack
2010Negative and positive polarity items: An investigation of the interplay of lexical meaning and global conditions on expression. In The Expression of Negation, Laurence R. Horn (ed.), 187–224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack, Rullmann, Hotze, Sánchez-Valencia, Victor
& Van Der Wouden, Ton (eds) 2001Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honti László
1997Die Negation im Uralischen I–III. Linguistica Uralica 33: 81–96, 161–176, 241–252.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2010A nyelvrokonságról. Az török, sumer és egyéb áfium ellen való orvosság (On the genetic relatedness of languages: Debunking the Turkic, Sumerian and other myths). Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence & Kato, Yasuhiko
(eds) 2000Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
2009Proto-Uralic: What, where, and when? In The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 257], Jussi Ylikoski (ed.), 57–78. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Kahrel, Peter
1996Aspects of Negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Kimball, Geoffrey D.
1991Koasati Grammar. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2001Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 111: 315–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koehn, Edward & Koehn, Sally
1986Apalai. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 33–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Michael
1992The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68: 4–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Johanna
2010Contact and the Finno-Ugric Languages. In The Handbook of Language Contact [Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics], Raymond Hickey (ed.), 598–617. Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva
1997Demonstratives in Interaction: The Emergence of a Definite Article in Finnish [Studies in Discourse Grammar 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse
1965The function of quantity in Finnish and Estonian. Language 41: 447–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2004Suomen kieltoverbikonstruktio typologisessa valossa (A typological perspective on the Finnish negative verb construction). Virittäjä 108(3): 364–388.Google Scholar
2005aStandard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005bSubtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 462–465. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006Negation. In Handbook of Pragmatics: The 2006 Installment, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds), 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Negation – An overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 552–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54], Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 63–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moseley, Christopher
(ed.) 2010Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, 3rd edn. Paris: UNESCO. 〈http://​www​.unesco​.org​/culture​/en​/endangeredlanguages​/atlasGoogle Scholar
Nedyalkov, Igor
1994Evenki. In Typological Studies in Negation [Typological Studies in Language 29], Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R.
1985Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sajnovics, János
1770Demonstratio idioma Ungarorum et Lapponum idem esse. Hafniae: Salicath.Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani
2002Problems in the taxonomy of the Uralic languages in the light of modern comparative studies. In Lingvističeskij bespredel: sbornikstatek k 70-letiju А. I. Kuznecovoj, 44–55. Moskva: Izd. Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka
1988Historical phonology of the Uralic languages with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric and Permic. In Uralic languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Denis Sinor (ed.), 478–554. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
1997Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R.C.
1969Bagirmi grammar [Linguistic Monograph Series 3]. Khartoum: Sudan Research Unit, University of Khartoum.Google Scholar
Tauli, Valter
1963Structural Tendencies in Uralic Languages [Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series 17.] The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tamm, Anne
2011aCross-categorial spatial case in the Finnic nonfinite system: Focus on the absentive TAM semantics and pragmatics of the Estonian inessive m-formative nonfinites. Linguistics 49(4): 835–944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bThe case of Nincstelenek (‘the destitute’): Nounless and verbless in the Uralic grammar. In Proceedings of Congressus XI Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum: Piliscsaba, Hungary, August 9–14, 2010, Sándor Csúcs, Nóra Falk, Viktória Tóth & Gábor Zaicz (eds), 270–276. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.Google Scholar
2014The partitive concept versus linguistic partitives: From abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54], Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 89–151. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Brattico, Pauli
2014The Finnish accusative: Long-distance case assignment under agreement. Linguistics 52(1): 73–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Der Wouden, Ton
1997Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba
2013Negative existentials: A cross-linguistic study. Rivista di linguistica 25(1): 107–145.Google Scholar

References

van der Auwera, Johan & Lejeune, Ludo (with Valentin Goussev
) 2005The prohibitive. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 290–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/71〉]Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1979Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2005Negative morphemes. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/112〉]Google Scholar
2011aOrder of negative morpheme and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 143. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/143Google Scholar
2011bPosition of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Chapter 144. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/144Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastassia
2007N-words and negative concord, In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The Word Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 466–469. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/115〉]Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1978Remarks on neg-raising In Syntax and Semantics vol. 9. Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 129–220. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005aStandard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005bSymmetric and asymmetric standard negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 458–461. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/113〉]Google Scholar
2005cSubtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 462–465. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Available online at 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/114〉]Google Scholar
2007Negation – an overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (5): 552–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R.
1985Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol I, Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rédei, Károly
1978Syrjänische Chrestomathie. Mit Grammatik und Glossar [Studia Uralica 1]. Wien: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar