Article published in:
Negation in Uralic Languages
Edited by Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm and Beáta Wagner-Nagy
[Typological Studies in Language 108] 2015
► pp. 399432
References

Internet sources

www6 http://​uralictypology​.pbworks​.com〉 (22 September 2012).
Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Y
2008Versatile cases. Journal of Linguistics 44(3): 565–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erelt, Mati
2012Lisandusi tegumoe käsitlusele. Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 57: 25-34.Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Erelt, Tiiu & Ross, Kristiina
1997Eesti keele käsiraamat [The Handbook of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus. 〈http://​www​.eki​.ee​/books​/ekk09/〉 (22 September 2012).Google Scholar
Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Saari, Henn, Tael, Kaja & Vare, Silvi
1995Eesti Keele Grammatika, I: Morfoloogia. Sõnamoodustus [The Grammar of the Estonian language I. Morphology. Word formation]. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
1993Eesti Keele Grammatika, II: Süntaks. Lisa: Kiri [The Grammar of the Estonian Language, II: Syntax]. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2005Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 466–469. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2011The contemporary pragmatics of the Estonian clause combiner and particle ega. In Congressus XI Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Piliscsaba 9–14.8.10, Vol. IV, Sándor Csúcs, Nóra Falk, Viktória Tóth, Gábor Zaicz (eds), 197–205. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.Google Scholar
Klaus, Anneliis
2009Eitus eesti murretes [Negation in the Estonian dialects]. MA thesis, University of Tartu.
Lindström, Liina & Tragel, Ilona
2010The possessive perfect construction in Estonian. Folia Linguistica 44: 371–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metslang, Helle
(ed.) 2009Estonian in typological perspective. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 62(1/2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metslang, Helle, Habicht, Külli & Pajusalu, Karl
2011Developmental paths of interrogative particles: The case of Estonian. Folia Linguistica Historica 32(1): 149–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2011Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In The The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), Ch. 114 Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. 〈http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/114〉 (12 December 2012).Google Scholar
2005Standard Negation. The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pajusalu, K., Hennoste, T., Niit, E., Päll, P. & Viikberg, J
2009Eesti murded ja kohanimed (2nd edn). Tallinn: Eesti Keele SihtasutusGoogle Scholar
Paldre, Leho
1998Eitustundlikud üksused eesti keeles [Negative polarity items in Estonian]. MA thesis, University of Tartu.
Payne, Thomas E
1997Describing Morphosyntax. A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rätsep, Huno
1971Kas kaudne kõneviis on kõneviis? Verbivormide situatsioonianalüüsi [Is the obviative mood a mood? A situative analysis of verb forms]. Keel ja struktuur 5: 45–69.Google Scholar
Sang, Joel
1983Eitus eesti keeles [Negation in Estonian]. Tallinn: Valgus.Google Scholar
1980Eituse keerdküsimusi [Puzzles of negation]. Keel ja kirjandus 8: 481–488.Google Scholar
Tamm, Anne
2007Estonian transitive verbs and object case. In Proceedings of the LFG08 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI. 〈http://​csli​-publications​.stanford​.edu​/LFG​/11​/lfg06tamm​.pdf〉 (12 December 2012).Google Scholar
2008Problems of automatic accent assignment: A comparison of Hungarian and Estonian verbs. Presentation at Budapest Uralic Workshop 6.- Budapesti Uráli Műhely 6. Sounds of Uralic Languages – Uráli HANGoskodó. January 11th–12th, 2008.
2009The Estonian partitive evidential: some notes on the semantic parallels between the aspect and evidential categories. In Papers from TAM TAM: Cross-linguistic semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality, Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 365–401. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Cross-categorial spatial case in the Finnic nonfinite system: Focus on the absentive TAM semantics and pragmatics of the Estonian inessive m-formative nonfinites. Linguistics 49(4): 835–944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Scalar Verb Classes. Scalarity, Thematic Roles, and Arguments in the Estonian Aspectual Lexicon [Biblioteca di Studi di Filologia Moderna 14]. Florence: Firenze University Press. 〈http://​www​.fupress​.com​/Archivio​/pdf\5326​.pdf〉 (12 December 2012).Google Scholar
Uuspõld, Ellen
1966Määrusliku des-, mata-, nud- (~ nuna-), ja tud- (~ tuna-) konstruktsiooni struktuur ja tähendus [The structure and meaning of the adverbial constructions with the suffixes des-, mata-, nud- (~ nuna-), and tud- (~ tuna-)] Keele modelleerimise probleeme I, [Tartu Riikliku Ülikooli toimetised 188]. 1–196. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool.Google Scholar
Viks, Ülle
1992aA concise morphological dictionary of Estonian, I: Introduction and Grammar. Tallinn: Eesti TA Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
1992bVäike vormisõnastik I. Sissejuhatus ja grammatika. [A concise morphological dictionary of Estonian, Part 1. Introduction and grammar]. Tallinn: Eesti TA Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
2003Soome-eesti sõnastiku lisa: Viron muoto-oppia/Eesti morfoloogia. Viron vastineiden taivutussanasto/Eesti vastete morfoloogiasõnastik [Appendix to the Finnish-Estonian dictionary. Estonian morphology. The morphological dictionary of Estonian forms]. In Soome-eesti suursõnaraamat 2 [Finnish-Estonian dictionary 2], V. Pall (ed.), 929–1301. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut, Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lindström, Liina, Maarja-Liisa Pilvik & Helen Plado
2021. Variation in negation in Seto. Studies in Language 45:3  pp. 557 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.