Article published in:
Valence Changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology
Edited by Natalie Operstein and Aaron Huey Sonnenschein
[Typological Studies in Language 110] 2015
► pp. 55–78

Chapter 4. Valence alternations in the Tlacolula Valley Zapotec lexicon

| University of California, Los Angeles
This paper analyzes the formal alternations in a database of more than 150 pairs of verbs from Tlacolula Valley Zapotec (TVZ) that exhibit explicit valence alternations of several types (most commonly intransitive/ transitive, reflecting non-causative/causative or passive/active alternations) or that show the same morphological alternations as valence-alternating pairs. I consider how these verbs reflect proposed sources for such alternations in Proto-Zapotec. On the basis of these data, I conclude that such alternations are not productive in the synchronic grammar of TVZ: the very existence of a second member of a verb pair is not predictable, and the particular form it will take, or its meaning, is similarly unexpected.
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.110.04mun
References
Avelino, Heriberto
2001 The Fortis-Lenis Issue in Yalálag Zapotec. MA thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence
1994-2007 Proto-Zapotec reconstructions. Ms, University of Pittsburgh. (Not seen; cited in Operstein & Sonnenschein 2012).
Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle
2012 Causative verbs in Colonial Valley Zapotec. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, Portland OR, January 2012.
López Cruz, Ausencia
1997 Morfología verbal del zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá. Tesis (licenciada en lingüística), Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México DF.
Munro, Pamela
2000 San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec nèe and cëhnn ‘with’: Preposition, adverb (?), applicative. Paper presented at the Conference on American Indian Languages, American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, CA, November 2000.
2006 Modal expression in Valley Zapotec. In The Expression of Modality, William Frawley (ed.), 173-205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013 A definite mystery. In Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 9-11, 2007, Special Session on Languages of Mexico and Central America, Zhenya Antić, Charles B. Chang, Clare S. Sandy & Maziar Toosarvandani (eds), 91-103. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela & Lopez, Felipe H., with Méndez [Martínez], Olivia V, Garcia, Rodrigo & Galant, Michael R
1999 Di’csyonaary X:tèe’n Dìi’zh Sah Sann Lu’uc (Dictionary of San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec / Diccionario Zapoteco de San Lucas Quiaviní), 2 Vols. Los Angeles CA: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Publications.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene
1948 The identification of morphemes. Language 24: 414-441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Operstein, Natalie
2012a Proto-Zapotec *tty/*ty and *ttz/*tz . International Journal of American Linguistics 78: 1-40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Typology and diachrony: On the origin of the Zapotec causative prefix *k-. Handout from UCLA American Indian Seminar presentation, January.
Pickett, Velma
1953 Isthmus Zapotec verb analysis I. International Journal of American Linguistics 19: 292-296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1996 Causatives and Causation: A Universal-Typological Perspective. London: Longman. (Not seen; cited in Operstein 2012b.)Google Scholar
Suarez, Jorge A
1973 On Proto-Zapotec phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 39: 236-249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar