Article published in:Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 39–60
Looking for ergativity in Indo-Aryan
Indo-Aryan languages are often described as ergative or split-ergative. The article investigates the extent of this claim, by looking at a number of constructions in 22 New Indo-Aryan languages. It is shown that ergative constructions are in general the minority, and that other mechanisms of alignment, such as transitivity-indicating agreement patterns, are as valuable to be studied as strictly ergative patterns. Our conclusion also applies to historical studies on the evolution of the Indo-Aryan alignment system, which sometimes seem to focus too much on specific ergative patterns, thus overlooking other motivations of alignment.
Published online: 14 June 2016
Baruah, P.N. Dutta
Bhayani, Harivallabh C.
de Swart, Peter
Grierson, George A.
Hock, Hans Henrich
Khokhlova, Liudmila V.
Liperovsky, Vladimir P.
Peterson, John M.
Schmidt, Ruth Laila & Kohistani, Razwal
Cited by 1 other publications
Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.