Cover not available
Part of
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 39–60

Looking for ergativity in Indo-Aryan

 | Research Foundation Flanders – FWO | Ghent University
 | Ghent University
Indo-Aryan languages are often described as ergative or split-ergative. The article investigates the extent of this claim, by looking at a number of constructions in 22 New Indo-Aryan languages. It is shown that ergative constructions are in general the minority, and that other mechanisms of alignment, such as transitivity-indicating agreement patterns, are as valuable to be studied as strictly ergative patterns. Our conclusion also applies to historical studies on the evolution of the Indo-Aryan alignment system, which sometimes seem to focus too much on specific ergative patterns, thus overlooking other motivations of alignment.
Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.112.02ver
References (35)
References
Allen, William. 1960. Notes on the Rajasthani verb. Indian Linguistics 21: 1-13.Google Scholar
Baruah, P.N. Dutta. 1980. An Intensive Course in Assamese. Mysore: Central institute of Indian languages.Google Scholar
Bhayani, Harivallabh C. (ed.). 1953-1960. Paumacariu of Kavirāja Svayambhūdeva, 3 Vols. Bombay: Singhi Jain Shastra Shikshapith - Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. On the scope of referential hierarchy in the typology of grammatical relations. In Case and Grammatical Relations [Typological Studies in Language 81], Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 191-210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.) 399-445. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit. 1996. The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1998. A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃsa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George. 1965. A Gujarati Reference Grammar. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology. Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-393. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57: 626�657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Peter. 2006. Case markedness. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 249-267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59-138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filimonova, Elena. 2005. The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9: 77-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1903-1926. Linguistic Survey of India. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hutt, Michael 1997. Modern Literary Nepali. An Introductory Reader. New Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Liudmila V. 1992. Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18: 71-98.Google Scholar
Kochaḍ, H. 2013[1957]. Apabhraṃs Sāhitya [Anusandhān Pariṣad 8]. Dillī: Bhāratīya Sāhitya Mandir.Google Scholar
Koul, Omkar N. & Wali, Kashi. 2006. Modern Kashmiri Grammar. Springfield VA: Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar
Liperovsky, Vladimir P. 2007. Notes on the marking of actants in Braj (in comparison with Modern Standard Hindi). In Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 144-152. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Montaut, Annie. 2004. Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications: Questioning the category of subject. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 33-56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu: The status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1997. Marathi. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, John M. 1998. Grammatical relations in Pali and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. Language of the Gods in the World of Men. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Prem. 1984. Khajano [Treasure]. In Aaj ri Rajasthani kahaniyan [Contemporary Rajasthani stories], Rawat Saraswat & Prem (eds.), 91�94. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth Laila & Kohistani, Razwal. 2008. A Grammar of the Shina Language of Indus Kohistan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sharma, K. 1991. Pūrvī rājasthānī: Udbhav aur vikās. [Eastern Rajasthani: Origin and development]. Jaypur: The Students Book Company.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal studies & Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010a. Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznán Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(2): 237-253.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Non-nominative subjects in Rajasthani and Central Pahari. Lingua Posnaniensis LII(1): 81-97.Google Scholar
Warder, Athony Kennedy. 1972-2004. Indian Kāvya Literature, 7 Vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Yashaschandra, Sitamshu. 2003. From Hemacandra to Hind Svarāj: Region and power in Gujarati literary culture. In Literary Cultures in History, Sheldon Pollock (ed.), 567-611. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.