Looking for ergativity in Indo-Aryan
Indo-Aryan languages are often described as ergative or split-ergative. The article investigates the extent of this claim, by looking at a number of constructions in 22 New Indo-Aryan languages. It is shown that ergative constructions are in general the minority, and that other mechanisms of alignment, such as transitivity-indicating agreement patterns, are as valuable to be studied as strictly ergative patterns. Our conclusion also applies to historical studies on the evolution of the Indo-Aryan alignment system, which sometimes seem to focus too much on specific ergative patterns, thus overlooking other motivations of alignment.
References (35)
References
Allen, William. 1960. Notes on the Rajasthani verb. Indian Linguistics 21: 1-13.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baruah, P.N. Dutta. 1980. An Intensive Course in Assamese. Mysore: Central institute of Indian languages.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhayani, Harivallabh C. (ed.). 1953-1960. Paumacariu of Kavirāja Svayambhūdeva, 3 Vols. Bombay: Singhi Jain Shastra Shikshapith - Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.) 399-445. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bubenik, Vit. 1996. The Structure and Development of Middle Indo-Aryan Dialects. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardona, George. 1965. A Gujarati Reference Grammar. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology. Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-393. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57: 626�657. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Swart, Peter. 2006. Case markedness. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 249-267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59-138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-855. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filimonova, Elena. 2005. The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9: 77-113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grierson, George A. 1903-1926. Linguistic Survey of India. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent, Government Printing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutt, Michael 1997. Modern Literary Nepali. An Introductory Reader. New Delhi: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khokhlova, Liudmila V. 1992. Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18: 71-98.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kochaḍ, H. 2013[1957]. Apabhraṃs Sāhitya [Anusandhān Pariṣad 8]. Dillī: Bhāratīya Sāhitya Mandir.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koul, Omkar N. & Wali, Kashi. 2006. Modern Kashmiri Grammar. Springfield VA: Dunwoody Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liperovsky, Vladimir P. 2007. Notes on the marking of actants in Braj (in comparison with Modern Standard Hindi). In Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 144-152. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montaut, Annie. 2006. The evolution of the tense-aspect system in Hindi/Urdu: The status of the ergative alignment. In Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1997. Marathi. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, John M. 1998. Grammatical relations in Pali and the emergence of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. München: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollock, Sheldon. 2006. Language of the Gods in the World of Men. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prem. 1984. Khajano [Treasure]. In Aaj ri Rajasthani kahaniyan [Contemporary Rajasthani stories], Rawat Saraswat & Prem (eds.), 91�94. New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, Ruth Laila & Kohistani, Razwal. 2008. A Grammar of the Shina Language of Indus Kohistan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sharma, K. 1991. Pūrvī rājasthānī: Udbhav aur vikās. [Eastern Rajasthani: Origin and development]. Jaypur: The Students Book Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal studies & Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010a. Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznán Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(2): 237-253.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010b. Non-nominative subjects in Rajasthani and Central Pahari. Lingua Posnaniensis LII(1): 81-97.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warder, Athony Kennedy. 1972-2004. Indian Kāvya Literature, 7 Vols. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yashaschandra, Sitamshu. 2003. From Hemacandra to Hind Svarāj: Region and power in Gujarati literary culture. In Literary Cultures in History, Sheldon Pollock (ed.), 567-611. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.