Article published in:
Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective
Edited by Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński
[Typological Studies in Language 112] 2016
► pp. 165200
References

References

Anand, Pranav & Nevins, Andrew
2006The locus of ergative case assignment: Evidence from scope. In Ergativity: Emerging Issues, Alana Johns, Diane Massam & Juve´nal Ndayiragije (eds), 3–25. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Paul Kent
1986Die ta-Partizipialkonstruktion bei Ashoka: Passiv oder Ergativ? Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 99: 75-94.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1977On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles Li (ed.), 317-363. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bahal, Kalicharan
1989Adhunik Rajasthani ka sanrachnatmak vyakaran (Generative Grammar of Modern Rajasthani). Jodhpur: Rajasthani Sahitya sansthan.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena
1999The Urdu and Hindi ergative postposition ne: Its changing role in the grammar. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 11-36. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Bon, Estella D.
2002Personal inflexions and order of clitics in Kashmiri. In Topics in Kashmiri Linguistics, Omkar N. Koul & Kashi Wali (eds), 129-142. New Delhi: Creative Books.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1998A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2001A reexamination of the accusative to ergative shift in Indo-Aryan. In Time Over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 105–141. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1993Conscious choice and some light verbs in Urdu. In Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages, Manindra K. Verma (ed.), 11-46. Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
2006The dative-ergative connection. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 69–92. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss6​/index​_en​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cardona, George
1965A Gujarati Reference Grammar. Philadelphia PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology. Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329-393. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1981Aspect and voice: some reflections on perfect and passive. In Tense and Aspect [Syntax and Semantics 14], Philip J. Tedeschi & Annie Zaenen (eds), 65–78. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dave, Trimbaklal
1935A Study of the Gujarati Language in the 16th Century (V.S.). London: The Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice
2000Lexicon anaphora and pronouns in Hindi/Urdu. In Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages: A Principled Typology, Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 431-432. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1888Altindische Syntax. Halle: Waisenhaus.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elizarenkova, Tatiana Y.
1982Grammatika vedijskogo yazyka (Vedic grammar). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Gaeffke, Peter
1967Untersuchungen zur Syntax des Hindi. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Gusain, Lakhan
2004Marwari. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986P-oriented constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Bhadriraju Krishnamurti, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds.), 15-26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
1991Possessive agents in Sanskrit? In Studies in Sanskrit Syntax, Hock, Hans Henrich (ed.), 55-70. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin
1992On identifying the conceptual restructuring of passive as ergative in Indo-Aryan. In Pāninian Studies. Professor S.D. Joshi Felicitation Volume, Madhav M. Deshpande & Saroja Bhate (eds), 177-199. Ann Arbor MI: Center for South and South East Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin & Koul, Omkar N.
1992Reflexive possessives in Kashmiri and Hindi-Urdu: Evidence for an antecedency hierarchy. South Asian Language Review 2(1): 68–83.Google Scholar
1984Pronominal suffixes and split ergativity. In Aspects of Kashmiri Linguistics, Peter Edwin Hook & Omkar N. Koul (eds), 123-135. New Delhi: Bahri.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W.
1979The case of the agent in Indo-European. Die Sprache 25: 129-143.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna, Kachru, Braj B. & Bhatia, Tej K.
1976The notion ‘subject’: A note on Hindi-Urdu, Kashmiri and Panjabi. In The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages [Department of South Asian Studies, Publication 2], Manindra K. Verma (ed.), 79-108. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Liudmila V.
1989Podlezhashchyje svojstva imennykh grupp v ergativoidnykh jazykakh Zapadnoj Indii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta 13(4): 34-46.Google Scholar
1992Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18: 71-97.Google Scholar
1995On the development of patient-oriented constructions in Late Western NIA Languages. Osmania Papers in Linguistics. 21:15-52.Google Scholar
2001 Ergativity attrition in the history of Western New Indo-Aryan Languages (Hindi/Urdu, Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajasthani). The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 159-184.Google Scholar
2003 The distribution of analytic and synthetic passives in Indo-European languages of Western India (Hindi/Urdu, Punjabi, Gujarati and Rajasthani). In Studies in Honour of P.J. Mistry, Ritva Laury, Gerald McMenamin & Shigeko Okamoto (eds), 139-157. New Delhi: Creative Publishers.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Liudmila V. & Singh, Charanjit
2007Resultative constructions with overt agent/possessor in Western NIA Languages (Hindi-Urdu, Punjabi, Gujarati, Rajasthani). In Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics, Colin P. Masica (ed.), 91-118. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej E.
1992Ocherki po obshchim i prikladnym voprosam jazykoznanija. Moscow: Moscow University Press.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Alexander
1997Beyond Subject and Object: Towards a Comprehensive Relational Typology. Linguistic Typology 1: 279-346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1978Arguments against a passive origin of the IA ergative. In Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting, 204–216. Chicago IL: CLS.
1979On the status of subjecthood hierarchy in Hindi. IJDL 1(8):17–31.Google Scholar
1987Mechanisms of ergativity in South Asia. Lingua 71: 61-102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klimov, Georgij A.
1983Printsipi Kontensivnoy Typologiji (Principles of content typology). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liperovsky, Vladimir P.
1988Ocherk Grammatiki Sovremennogo Bradza (Short Braj grammar). Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Magier, David
1983Components of ergativity in Marwari. In Chicago Linguistic Socity. Papers from the 19th Regional Meeting , 244 -255. Chicago IL: CLS.
Mistry, P.J.
2004Subjecthood of non-nominatives in Gujarati. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montaut, Annie
1994Reflexivation et focalisation en Hindi/Ourdou. Bull. de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris. 89(1): 83–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Oblique main arguments in Hindi as localizing predications. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 33-56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John
1998Grammatical Relations in Pāli and the Emergence of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pray, Bruce
1976From passive to ergative in Indo-Aryan. In The Notion of Subject in South Asian Languages [Department of South Asian Studies Publication 2], Manindra K. Verma (ed.), 195–211. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Savelyeva, Liudmila V.
1965Yazyk Gujarati. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Singh, R.A.
1980Syntax of Apabhramsha. Calcutta: Simant Publications.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof
2011Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Speijer, Jan S.
1973[1886]Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata
1971Notes on reflexivization in Hindi syntax. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 2(1): 180–214.Google Scholar
Swami, Narottamdas
1960Rajasthani vyakaran (in Rajasthani). Bikaner: Sadul Rajasthani Research Society.Google Scholar
Tessitory, Luigi P.
1914–1916Notes on the grammar of Old Western Rajasthani with special reference to Apabhramsha and Gujarati and Marwari. Indian Antiquary. Hindi Translation by Namvar Singh, Nagaripracharini Sabha, Kashi 1955.Google Scholar
Trask, R. Larry
1979On the origin of ergativity. In Ergativity. Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.) 385-404. London: Academic press.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi & Koul, Omkar N.
1997Kashmiri: A Cognitive Descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitney, William D.
1969[1888]Sanskrit Grammar. Delhi: Motilal BanarsidassGoogle Scholar
Zakharyin, Boris
1979On the formation of ergativity in Indo-Aryan and Dardic. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 5: 50-71.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bubenik, Vit
2017. Uta Reinöhl: Grammaticalization and the rise of configurationality in Indo-Aryan . Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1  pp. 363 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.