Exploring finiteness and non-finiteness in Pima Bajo (Uto-Aztecan)
This paper aims to provide a proper characterization of finite and non-finite clauses in Pima Bajo, a Uto-Aztecan language from the Tepiman branch. Our main research questions are, firstly, how to address the topic of finiteness in a language without morphological tense marking? And secondly, what are the relevant features or properties that distinguish finite and non-finite constructions in a language with no obligatory agreement markers? Finiteness and non-finiteness have long been discussed and analyzed in either formal or functional terms, mostly from a Eurocentric perspective. The most traditional notion takes finiteness to be associated with tense-aspect and agreement only, whereas functional approaches, consider finiteness to be a scalar, or gradient, phenomenon not reducible to tense-aspect marking and agreement. This paper analyzes finite and non-finite constructions in Pima Bajo, taking into consideration different morphosyntactic features, among them those that express illocutionary force and those that anchor the event. These features include aspect suffixes, personal pronouns, modals, and scope particles, among others. The analysis of finite and non-finite constructions in Pima Bajo shows that finiteness is a construction and language-particular phenomenon that cannot be reduced to morphological properties of the verb such as person and number agreement or tense marking.
References (28)
References
Bisang, Walter. 2001. Finite vs. non-finite languages. In Language Typology and Linguistic Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1400-1413. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bisang, Walter. 2007. Categories that make finiteness: Discreteness from a functional perspective and some of its repercussions. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 115-137. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowper, Elizabeth. 2002. Finiteness. <[URL]> (12 July 2012).
Cowper, Elizabeth & Hall, Daniel Currie. 1999. Semantic composition and syntactic structure: English inflection. Paper presented to
the Canadian Linguistic Association
. University of Sherbrooke.
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. 1998. Pima bajo de Yepachi, Chihuahua. Archivo de Lenguas Indígenas de México. México: El Colegio de México.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. 2014. Gramática de referencia de pima bajo, Vol. I. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. Forthcoming. Gramática de referencia de pima bajo, Vol. II. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Kenneth L. 1977. Breve vocabulario del idioma pima de Ónavas (Desde materiales proporcionados por las siguientes personas: Agustín Estrella, Pedro Estrella, María Fierro y María Córdova). Ms.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Kenneth L. 1983. Walpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5-47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1988. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordens, Peter & Dimroth, Christine. 2006. Finiteness in children and adults learning Dutch. In The Acquisition of Verbs and Their Grammar: The Effect of Particular Languages, N. Gagarina & I. Gülzow (eds), 173-198. Dordrecht: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keifer, Ferenc. 1994. Modality. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ron E. Asher (ed.), 2515-2520. Oxford: Pergamon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition: Essays in Honor of Jürgen Weissenborn, Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds), 225-245. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Launey, Michel. 1994. Une grammaire omniprédicative. Essai sur la morphosyntaxe du nahuatl classique. Paris: CNRS Editions.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maas, Utz. 2004. Finite and non-finite from a typological perspective. Linguistics 42(2): 359-385. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.). 2007. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2010. Typology of finiteness. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12): 1176-1189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perlmutter, David M. 2007. In what ways can finite and nonfinite clauses differ? Evidence from Russian. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 250-305. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rijkhoff, Jan & van Lier, Eva. 2013. Flexible Word Classes: Typological Studies of Underspecified Parts of Speech. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschoko, Martina. 2005. Anchoring events to utterances without tense. In
Proceedings of the 24th Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics
, John Alderete, Chung-hye Han & Alexei Kocheto (eds), 343-351. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Artawa, Ketut. 2015. Balinese valency classes. In Valency Classes: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 877-940. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Buckingham. 1862. Arte de la lengua névome que se dice pima, propia de Sonora, con la doctrina christiana y confesionario añadidos [Shea’s Library of American Linguistics 5]. New York NY: Cramoisy Press. (Republished by AMS Press, New York NY, 1970).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steele, Susan, Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard, Jelinek, Eloise, Kitagawa, Chiasato, Oehrle, Richard, & Wasow, Thomas. 1981. An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence. Boston MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
2024.
What is finiteness in Dagaare?.
Journal of World Languages 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.