Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 243268
References (54)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think” – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. Imperatives and Commands [Oxford Studies in Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Arroyo, José Luis Blas. 2011. From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855-874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 9], Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335-362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1965[1934]. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer. Reprint of Jena: Fischer.: Fischer.Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 1995. A Grammar of Kisi, a Southern Atlantic Language [Mouton Grammar Library 16]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele. 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nick. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floricic, Franck & Molinu, Lucia. 2012. Romance monosyllabic imperatives and markedness. Ms.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, E. 2005. A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395-413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 383-398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2005. The Pragmatic Marker-discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course . PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.
Givón, T. 2011. Finiteness and nominalization. Ms, University of Oregon and White Cloud Ranch, Ignacio.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on His 60th Birthday , Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Han, Chung-Hye. 1998. The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3-4): 235-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa. Forthcoming. The !Xun Language: A Dialect Grammar of Northern Khoisan [Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics. New York NY: T.A. Sebeok.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. And-parenthetical clauses. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 145-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E., Kodzasov, Sandro V., Muravyova, Irina A. & Kurebito, Megumi. 2004. Language and Folklore of the Alutor People [Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim]. Suita: Faculty of Informatics, Osaka Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. 2000. Turkish Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Morris, Henry Francis & Kirwan, Brian Edmond. 1957. A Runyankore Grammar. Nairobi: Eagle Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Osumi, Midori. 1995. Tinrin Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rivero, María & Terzi, Arhonto. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouchota, Villy. 1998. Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 97-126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 155-196. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511-580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia Schwartz, 255-308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Hidemitsu. 2005. Imperatives in subordinate clauses. Annual Report on Cultural Science 117: 45-87.Google Scholar
. 2008. Imperatives in concessive clauses: compatibility between constructions. <[URL]>
. 2012. A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of the English Imperative: With Special Reference to Japanese Imperatives [Human Cognitive Processing 35]. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba N. 2006. Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle. [Typological Studies in Language 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1963. Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6: 1-49.Google Scholar
Wehr, Barbara. 2000. Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des franais parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239-289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay. 1997. Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1-2): 1-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
2024. What is finiteness in Dagaare?. Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël
2024. Specialization and finiteness (a)symmetry in imperative negation: with a comparison to standard negation. Linguistic Typology 28:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2023. The Grammar of Interactives, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.