Part of
Finiteness and Nominalization
Edited by Claudine Chamoreau and Zarina Estrada-Fernández
[Typological Studies in Language 113] 2016
► pp. 243268
Aijmer, Karin
1997“I think” – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2008The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010Imperatives and Commands [Oxford Studies in Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2011From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855-874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne
2005Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 9], Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335-362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C
2005Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1965[1934]Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer. Reprint of Jena: Fischer.: Fischer.Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker
1995A Grammar of Kisi, a Southern Atlantic Language [Mouton Grammar Library 16]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele
1980Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nick
1996Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floricic, Franck & Molinu, Lucia
2012Romance monosyllabic imperatives and markedness. Ms.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, E
2005A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395-413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 383-398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2005The Pragmatic Marker-discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course . PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.
Givón, T
2011Finiteness and nominalization. Ms, University of Oregon and White Cloud Ranch, Ignacio.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on His 60th Birthday , Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Han, Chung-Hye
1998The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3-4): 235-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping
2013An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa
Forthcoming. The !Xun Language: A Dialect Grammar of Northern Khoisan [Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics. New York NY: T.A. Sebeok.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavalova, Yordanka
2007 And-parenthetical clauses. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 145-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E., Kodzasov, Sandro V., Muravyova, Irina A. & Kurebito, Megumi
2004Language and Folklore of the Alutor People [Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim]. Suita: Faculty of Informatics, Osaka Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey
2000Turkish Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Morris, Henry Francis & Kirwan, Brian Edmond
1957A Runyankore Grammar. Nairobi: Eagle Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul
2000The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Osumi, Midori
1995Tinrin Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rivero, María & Terzi, Arhonto
1995Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouchota, Villy
1998Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 97-126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M
1985Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 155-196. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511-580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia Schwartz, 255-308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Searle, John R
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Hidemitsu
2005Imperatives in subordinate clauses. Annual Report on Cultural Science 117: 45-87.Google Scholar
2008Imperatives in concessive clauses: compatibility between constructions. [URL]
Veselinova, Ljuba N
2006Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle. [Typological Studies in Language 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1963Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6: 1-49.Google Scholar
Wehr, Barbara
2000Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des franais parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239-289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay
1997Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1-2): 1-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2003Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39-81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Heine, Bernd
2023. The Grammar of Interactives, DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël
2023. Specialization and finiteness (a)symmetry in imperative negation: with a comparison to standard negation. Linguistic Typology 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.