On non-finiteness and canonical imperatives
Imperatives exhibit cross-linguistically a wide range of structures, which makes it difficult to generalize about them or to propose a structural definition that would apply to all or at least to most of them. This article is concerned with canonical imperatives, that is, information units that have an (implicit) second person singular subject referent as a hearer (or reader or signee) and express commands or requests directed at the hearer. Canonical imperatives have been called extragrammatical or extrasyntactical forms; they resemble nominalized verb forms in being non-finite. But non-finiteness appears to possess a different quality here from what it has, for example, in participial, infinitival, or other non-finite verb forms or clause types. Building on recent work on Discourse Grammar (Kaltenböck et al. 2011, Heine et al. 2013), the article attempts to account for this difference by looking at the role that imperatives play in structuring discourse.
References (54)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think” – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and Commands [Oxford Studies in Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arroyo, José Luis Blas. 2011. From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855-874. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 9], Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335-362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bühler, Karl. 1965[1934]. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer. Reprint of Jena: Fischer.: Fischer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Childs, G. Tucker. 1995. A Grammar of Kisi, a Southern Atlantic Language [Mouton Grammar Library 16]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele. 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faraclas, Nick. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floricic, Franck & Molinu, Lucia. 2012. Romance monosyllabic imperatives and markedness. Ms.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, E. 2005. A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395-413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 383-398. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2005. The Pragmatic Marker-discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course
. PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.
Givón, T. 2011. Finiteness and nominalization. Ms, University of Oregon and White Cloud Ranch, Ignacio.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In
Aspects of Modern Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on His 60th Birthday
, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Han, Chung-Hye. 1998. The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3-4): 235-260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa. Forthcoming. The !Xun Language: A Dialect Grammar of Northern Khoisan [Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics. New York NY: T.A. Sebeok.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-893. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007.
And-parenthetical clauses. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 145-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr E., Kodzasov, Sandro V., Muravyova, Irina A. & Kurebito, Megumi. 2004. Language and Folklore of the Alutor People [Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim]. Suita: Faculty of Informatics, Osaka Gakuin University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, Geoffrey. 2000. Turkish Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morris, Henry Francis & Kirwan, Brian Edmond. 1957. A Runyankore Grammar. Nairobi: Eagle Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osumi, Midori. 1995. Tinrin Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rivero, María & Terzi, Arhonto. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadock, Jerold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 155-196. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511-580. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2006. Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia Schwartz, 255-308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takahashi, Hidemitsu. 2005. Imperatives in subordinate clauses. Annual Report on Cultural Science 117: 45-87.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takahashi, Hidemitsu. 2008. Imperatives in concessive clauses: compatibility between constructions. <[URL]>
Watkins, Calvert. 1963. Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6: 1-49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wehr, Barbara. 2000. Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des franais parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239-289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whaley, Lindsay. 1997. Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1-2): 1-25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39-81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N.
2024.
What is finiteness in Dagaare?.
Journal of World Languages 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Olmen, Daniël
2024.
Specialization and finiteness (a)symmetry in imperative negation: with a comparison to standard negation.
Linguistic Typology 28:2
► pp. 205 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Heine, Bernd
2023.
The Grammar of Interactives,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.