On non-finiteness and canonical imperatives
Imperatives exhibit cross-linguistically a wide range of structures, which makes it difficult to generalize about them or to propose a structural definition that would apply to all or at least to most of them. This article is concerned with canonical imperatives, that is, information units that have an (implicit) second person singular subject referent as a hearer (or reader or signee) and express commands or requests directed at the hearer. Canonical imperatives have been called extragrammatical or extrasyntactical forms; they resemble nominalized verb forms in being non-finite. But non-finiteness appears to possess a different quality here from what it has, for example, in participial, infinitival, or other non-finite verb forms or clause types. Building on recent work on Discourse Grammar (Kaltenböck et al. 2011, Heine et al. 2013), the article attempts to account for this difference by looking at the role that imperatives play in structuring discourse.
References (54)
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “I think” – an English modal particle. In
Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives,
Toril Swan &
Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2008 The Manambu Language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2010 Imperatives and Commands [Oxford Studies in Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2011 From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish.
Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855-874.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne
2005 Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In
Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen [
Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 9],
Torsten Leuschner,
Tanja Mortelmans &
Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335-362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bühler, Karl
1965[1934] Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer. Reprint of Jena: Fischer.: Fischer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Childs, G. Tucker
1995 A Grammar of Kisi, a Southern Atlantic Language [
Mouton Grammar Library 16]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M.W
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele
1980 Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faraclas, Nick
1996 Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floricic, Franck & Molinu, Lucia
2012 Romance monosyllabic imperatives and markedness. Ms.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, E
2005 A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In
Approaches to Discourse Particles,
Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395-413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fraser, Bruce
1990 An approach to discourse markers.
Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 383-398.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2005 The Pragmatic Marker-discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course
. PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.
Givón, T
2011 Finiteness and nominalization. Ms, University of Oregon and White Cloud Ranch, Ignacio.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane
1991 Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In
Aspects of Modern Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on His 60th Birthday
,
Shuki Chiba,
Akira Ogawa,
Yasuaki Fuiwara,
Norio Yamada,
Osamu Koma &
Takao Yagi (eds), 232-254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Han, Chung-Hye
1998 The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
1998 The semantic status of discourse markers.
Lingua 104(3-4): 235-260.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping
2013 An outline of Discourse Grammar. In
Reflections on Functionalism in Linguistics,
Shannon Bischoff &
Carmen Jeny (eds), 175-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & König, Christa
Forthcoming.
The !Xun Language: A Dialect Grammar of Northern Khoisan [Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung]. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman
1960 Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics. New York NY: T.A. Sebeok.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
Kavalova, Yordanka
2007
And-parenthetical clauses. In
Parentheticals [
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106],
Nicole Dehé &
Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 145-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Aleksandr E., Kodzasov, Sandro V., Muravyova, Irina A. & Kurebito, Megumi
2004 Language and Folklore of the Alutor People [Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim]. Suita: Faculty of Informatics, Osaka Gakuin University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972 The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax.
Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, Geoffrey
2000 Turkish Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morris, Henry Francis & Kirwan, Brian Edmond
1957 A Runyankore Grammar. Nairobi: Eagle Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, Paul
2000 The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osumi, Midori
1995 Tinrin Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rivero, María & Terzi, Arhonto
1995 Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood.
Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadock, Jerold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M
1985 Speech act distinctions in syntax. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure,
Timothy Shopen (ed.), 155-196. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987 The thetic/categorical distinction revisited.
Linguistics 25: 511-580.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2006 Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe,
Giuliano Bernini &
Marcia Schwartz, 255-308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takahashi, Hidemitsu
2005 Imperatives in subordinate clauses.
Annual Report on Cultural Science 117: 45-87.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takahashi, Hidemitsu
2008 Imperatives in concessive clauses: compatibility between constructions.
[URL]
Watkins, Calvert
1963 Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb.
Celtica 6: 1-49.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wehr, Barbara
2000 Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des franais parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In
Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch,
Barbara Wehr &
Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239-289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whaley, Lindsay
1997 Introduction to Typology: The Unity and Diversity of Language. London: Sage.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
1993 Linguistic form and relevance.
Lingua 90(1-2): 1-25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2003 Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface.
Language 79(1): 39-81.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Heine, Bernd
2023.
The Grammar of Interactives,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Van Olmen, Daniël
2023.
Specialization and finiteness (a)symmetry in imperative negation: with a comparison to standard negation.
Linguistic Typology 0:0
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.