Cover not available
Part of
Switch Reference 2.0
Edited by Rik van Gijn and Jeremy Hammond
[Typological Studies in Language 114] 2016
► pp. 335–376

Ėven converbs and the syntax of switch-reference

| University of Graz
This paper provides a description of the switch-reference system based on converbs in the North Tungusic language Ėven. It is argued that Ėven converbal clauses are adjunct clauses and that their properties are derived from the ways in which adjunct subordinate clauses are structured and interpreted in this language. Similar to other adjuncts, converbs can be adjoined at clausal and predicate levels, and they can be attached to different elements of the clause. This accounts for their syntactic peculiarities. At a different level of description, switch-reference in Ėven is shown to be a part of the broader system of reference tracking based on the contrast between reflexive and non-reflexive elements. This explains the interpretive and semantic idiosyncrasies of converbal clauses.
Published online: 25 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.114.10mat
References (54)
References
Bergelson, Mira B. & Kibrik, Andrey A. 1995. The system of switch-reference in Tuva: Converbal and masdar-case forms. In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 373–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1991. Typologische Grundlagen der Satzverkettung : Ein Beitrag zur allgemeinen Grammatik der Satzverbindung und des Fährtenlegens. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
. 1993. Belhare subordination and the theory of topic. In Studies in Clause-Linkage, Karen Ebert (ed.), 23–55. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar
. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy: Syntax and Pragmatics [Studies in Language Companion Series 121], Isabelle Bril (ed.), 51–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brodskaja, Larisa M. 1988. Složenopodčinennoe predloženie v ėvenkijskom jazyke. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2010. On case concord: The syntax of switch-reference clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 239–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cincius, Vera I. 1947. Očerk grammatiki ėvenskogo (lamutskogo) jazyka. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael & Fernández Landaluce, Javier. 2012. On the (im)possibility of partial argument coreference. Linguistics 50: 765–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2001. The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Language 77(1): 433–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel. 1985. The syntax of switch-reference. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 35–55.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Munro, Pamela. 1983. Introduction. In Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds), ix–xv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Jeremy. 2014a. Switch Reference in Whitesands. Theoretical Issues and Experimental Evidence. PhD dissertation, MPI for Psycholinguistics and Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Switch-reference antecedence and subordination in Whitesands (Oceanic). In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language 105], Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds), 263–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, Beate & Lehmann, Christian. 2013. Partial coreference. In Languages across Boundaries. Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dirk Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 159–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), 1–55. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H.J. Jr. 1967. Switch reference in Hokan-Coahuilecan. In Studies in Southwestern Ethnolinguistics: Meaning and History in the Languages of the American Southwest, Dell Hymes & William E. Bittle (eds), 228–263. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H.J. Jr. 1983. Typological and genetic notes on switch-reference in North American Indian languages. In Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds), 151–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keine, Stefan. 2013. Deconstructing switch-reference. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 767–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolesnikova, Vera D. 1966. Sintaksis ėvenkijskogo jazyka. Moscow, Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Lavrillier, Alexandra & Matić, Dejan. 2013. Darja Mikhajlovna Osenina evedi nịmkarnị/Even nimkans by Darja Mikhailovna Osenina. Fürstenberg: Kulturstiftung Sibirien.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23: 379–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrey. 1995. Even. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 1999. Struktura prostogo predloženija v ėvenskom jazyke: Strukturnye i soderžatel’nye aspekty. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 2008. Sintaksis ėvenskogo jazyka: Semantičeskie, strukturnye, kommunikativnye aspekty. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
. 2012. Tungusic converbs and a typology of taxis (relative tense). In Recent Advances in Tunguisc Linguistics, Andrey Malchukov & Lindsey Whaley (eds), 211–226. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2003a. A Grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003b. Tundra Yukaghir. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan. 2011. Partial coreference and binding in Even. Talk presented at RRG2011 , Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Matić, Dejan & Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2013. Non-canonical SAY in Siberia: Areal and genealogical patterns. Studies in Language 37(2): 356–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matić, Dejan, van Putten, Saskia & Hammond, Jeremy. 2015. Left-dislocation, sentences and clauses in Avatime, Tundra Yukaghir and Whitesands. In Exploring the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Jens Fleischhauer, Anja Latrouite & Rainer Osswald (eds), 339–367. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan, van Gijn, Rik & Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2014. Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences: An overview. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language 2], Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Andrew. 2010. Subject domain restriction and reference tracking. In Proceedings of SALT 20, Nam Li & David Lutz (eds). Ithaca NY: CLC. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27(3): 469–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1998. Converbs in the languages of Eastern Siberia. Language Sciences 20(3): 339–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria. 2001. A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nonato, Rafael. 2014. Clause-chaining, switch-reference and coordination. <[URL]> (May 2014).
Novikova, Klavdia A. 1960/1980. Očerki dialektov evenskogo jazyka: Ol’skij govor, Vols 1-2. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Mary C. 1993. Disjoint reference and pragmatic inference: Anaphora and switch reference in Northern Pomo. In The Role of Theory in Language Description, William A. Foley (ed.), 215–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. 1983. Interclausal reference in Kashaya. In Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds), 267–290. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2007. Contact in the prehistory of the Sakha (Yakuts): Lingustic and Genetic Perspectives. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger. 2014. Topic management and clause combination in the Papuan language Usan. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language 105], Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds), 231–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1988. Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 45–63.Google Scholar
. 1997. Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. In Papers in Papuan Linguistics 3, Andrew Pawley (ed.), 101–241. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana, Bickel, Balthasar, Rai, Shree Kumar, Sharma (Gautam), Narayam, Rai, Arjun & Gaenszle, Martin (2012). Morphosyntactic properties and scope behavior of “subordinate” clauses in Puma (Kiranti). In Clause Combining in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Volker Gast & Holger Diesel (eds), 105–126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr & LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasilevič, Glafira M. 1940. Očerk grammatiki ėvenkijskogo (tungusskogo) jazyka. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine. 2014. The multiple coreference systems in the Ese Ejja subordinate clauses. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language 105], Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds.), 341–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi. 2003. Defining non-finites: Action nominals, converbs and infinitives. SKY Journal of Linguistics 16: 185–237.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 1998. Nomina sunt odiosa: A critique of the converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. <[URL]> (May 2014).