Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 138

audio

Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2019. Combinaciones entre operadores argumentativos. Spanish in Context 16:2  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Miller, Jim & Andreea S. Calude
2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 547 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bello, Andrés
(1847) 1984Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Madrid: EDAF.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2016Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure: Convergence and divergence. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Tyological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Joe
2009Doing Referring in Murriny Patha Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
2013Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language 89(4): 883–919. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, Rita
2009Metonymy in indirect directives: Stand-alone conditionals in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25], Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Antonio Barcelona (eds), 323–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buscha, Annerose
1976Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.Google Scholar
Cable, Seth
2011Insubordination in Tlingit: An areal effect? Northwest Journal of Linguistics 5(1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2006La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue 28: 119–132.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie, Deulofeu, Henri-José & Martin, Philippe
2008Pour une syntaxe sans ellipse. In Ellipse et effacement: Du schème de phrase aux règles discursives, Jean-Christophe Pitavy & Michèle Bigot (eds), 225–246. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint Étienne.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Evans, Nicholas
1988Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deulofeu, José
1988La syntaxe de que en français parlé et le problème de la subordination. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 8: 79–104.Google Scholar
1999Problèmes méthodologiques de l’analyse morphosyntaxique de que en français contemporain. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 15: 163–198.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick & Levinson, Stephen C.
(eds) 2006Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1985A Grammar of Kayardild, with Historical-comparative Notes on Tangkic. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
1988Odd topic marking in Kayardild. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], Peter Austin (ed.), 219–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Code, inference, placedness and ellipsis. In The Role of Theory in Linguistic Description, William A. Foley (ed.), 243–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995aA Grammar of Kayardild. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995bMultiple case in Kayardild: Anti-iconicity and the diachronic filter. In Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.), 396–428. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003aTypologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 203–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003bIntroduction: Comparative Non-Pama-Nyungan and Australian historical linguistics. In The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia: Comparative Studies of the Continent’s Most Linguistically Complex Region, Nicholas Evans (ed.), 3–25. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at conference on Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change , Osaka, Museum of Ethnography, March.
Fujii, Seiko
1992On the idiomaticity of conditional constructions in Japanese. In CIL1992: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Linguists, André Crochetiere, Jean-Claude Boulanger & Conrad Ouellon (eds), 59–62. Québec: Les Presses De l’Université Lavel.Google Scholar
2000A corpus-based study of reduced conditionals in Japanese conversation. In Selected papers from AILA’99 Tokyo. Proceedings of the 1999 International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Tokyo: Waseda Univesity Press.Google Scholar
2004Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types. The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 121–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garde, Murray
2013Culture, Interaction and Person Reference in an Australian Language [Culture in Language Use. Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
2008Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. Amerindia 32: 57–75.Google Scholar
Givón, Tom
2015The Diachrony of Grammar, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gras, Pedro
2011Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona. http://​www​.tesisenred​.net​/handle​/10803​/1716Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2011On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
1996Post-Saussurean linguistics: Towards an integrated theory of language. In (N)WAVES and MEANS: A selection of papers from NWAVE 24 [University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3:1], Miriam Meyerhoff (ed.), 1–24.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1976The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 78–105. Canberra: AIATSIS.Google Scholar
1982Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst, Steven Swartz (ed.), 217–315. Darwin: SIL-AAB.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984Grammaticalisation and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey
2005The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2014Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4): 927–960. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1997Territory of Information [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2007Discourse structure. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 301-371. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra
1983Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian languages, Vol. 3, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry Blake (eds), 191–304. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1968Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization. Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303-318.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffmann’s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffmann. Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wooton (eds), 161–227. Abingdon: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2006On the human “interaction engine”. In Enfield & Levinson, Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, 39–69.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2003“Pragmaticizzazione” dell’incompletezza sintattica nell’italiano parlato: Le ipotetiche sospese. In Il parlato italiano, Federico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: Atti del Convegno Nazionale, D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
2004Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditions in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar
2005Come era il parlato di lingue antiche: Le ipotetiche libere. Studi Italiani di Linguistica e Applicata 2: 225–255.Google Scholar
2009Ipotetiche libere nel non parlato. In Sintassi storica e sincronica dell'italiano: Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione (Atti del X Congresso Internazionale SILFI, Basilea, giugno-luglio 2008), Angela Ferrari (ed.), 1333–1355. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
2010Free conditionals in discourse: The forming of a construction. Linguisticae Investigationes 33(1): 50–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mal’čukov, Andrej
2013Verbalisation and insubordination in Siberian languages. In Shared Grammaticalization. With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1982How Lardil became accusative. Lingua 55:141–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity
2016No fixed address: The locative in insubordinate clauses in Gurindji Kriol. In Loss and Renewal: Australian Languages since Colonisation, Felicity Meakins & Carmel O’Shannessy (eds), 367–396. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 81(1): 69–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montolío, Estrella
1999¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre construcciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo. Oralia 2: 37–70.Google Scholar
Núñez-Lagos, Carmen
2005Le signifiant espagnol que: Quel signifié? PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne-Paris 4.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1996Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra.A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Framing effect in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. Berkeley Linguistic Society 23: 471–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L.
2005Motivation and convention in some speech act constructions: A cognitive linguistic approach. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, Sophia Marmaridou, Kiki Nikiforidou & Eleni Antonopoulou (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda
2011Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses: A case study from German. In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion [Human Cognitive Processing 32], Mario Brdar, Stefan T. Gries & Milena Fuchs (eds), 87–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1999Semantics. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Robert A. Wilan & Frank C. Keil (eds), 739–742. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2009Insubordination in Altaic. Journal of Philology . Ural-Altaic Studies 1: 61–79.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María
2008Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 21: 269–288.Google Scholar
Round, Erich
2012Kayardild Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila
2008An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel
1982Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh!’ and other things that come between sentences. In Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schlobinski, Peter
n.d. The function of non-embedded daß-clauses in therapeutic discourse. Ms.
Schwenter, Scott
1996The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8(2): 316–351.Google Scholar
1999Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si. Annuari de Filologia XXI(9): 87–100.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2010Espaces instables entre coordination et subordination. In La parataxe, Marie-José Béguelin, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf (eds), 231–254. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1999Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
2012A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36: 123–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weuster, Edith
1983Nicht-eingebettete Nebensätze mit Verb-Endstellung. Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen, Klaus Olszok and Edith Weuster (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David
1988Switch-reference in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Form, function and problems of identity. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], Peter Austin (ed.), 141–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick
2011Introduction. Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar