Cover not available
Part of
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 1–38

Chapter 1. The dynamics of insubordination

An overview

| CoEDL | Linguistics, Australian National University
| ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
This chapter has a triple function, as an introduction to the phenomenon of insubordination with particular exemplification from the Australian language Kayardild, a review article drawing together the last decade of research on the topic, and a reasoned synthesis of the chapters comprising this volume, organised around a number of interwoven thematic strands.Insubordination, we argue, is a key site for understanding the dynamic and constant interplay of parole and langue, i.e. of actual spoken data in discourse on the one hand, and grammatical models used by speakers (or grammarians) on the other. It is also a prime example of the benefits that can be reaped by seeing the sentences that underlie utterances as collaboratively constructed during dyadic interaction.Since the typological survey and initial model of insubordination put forward by Evans (2007), many studies have extended our empirical coverage of the phenomenon in the languages of the world, found new functions for structures originating through insubordination, or challenged aspects of the original model. Particularly important have been the development of improved mechanisms for representing constructional meaning, increasing attention to the grammar of interaction and actual conversational data, better incorporation of prosody into our models of syntax and conversation, and the use of corpora of actual rather than elicited speech. All these trends have enriched our understanding of the variety of functions that insubordination can discharge, and the embedding of its evolution in actual conversational practice. Once such functions are taken into account, insubordination ceases to be seen as an odd and marginal aberration, and instead appears as a typologically widespread consequence of speakers’ search for formal means of embedding their utterances in the wider discourse, whether dyadic or narrative.
Published online: 18 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.01eva
References
Bello, Andrés
(1847) 1984 Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Madrid: EDAF.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2016 Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure: Convergence and divergence. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Tyological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Joe
2009 Doing Referring in Murriny Patha Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
2013 Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language 89(4): 883–919. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, Rita
2009 Metonymy in indirect directives: Stand-alone conditionals in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25], Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Antonio Barcelona (eds), 323–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999 Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buscha, Annerose
1976 Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.Google Scholar
Cable, Seth
2011 Insubordination in Tlingit: An areal effect? Northwest Journal of Linguistics 5(1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2006 La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue 28: 119–132.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie, Deulofeu, Henri-José & Martin, Philippe
2008 Pour une syntaxe sans ellipse. In Ellipse et effacement: Du schème de phrase aux règles discursives, Jean-Christophe Pitavy & Michèle Bigot (eds), 225–246. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint Étienne.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Evans, Nicholas
1988 Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deulofeu, José
1988 La syntaxe de que en français parlé et le problème de la subordination. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 8: 79–104.Google Scholar
1999 Problèmes méthodologiques de l’analyse morphosyntaxique de que en français contemporain. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 15: 163–198.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick & Levinson, Stephen C.
(eds) 2006 Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1985 A Grammar of Kayardild, with Historical-comparative Notes on Tangkic. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
1988 Odd topic marking in Kayardild. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], Peter Austin (ed.), 219–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Code, inference, placedness and ellipsis. In The Role of Theory in Linguistic Description, William A. Foley (ed.), 243–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995a A Grammar of Kayardild. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995b Multiple case in Kayardild: Anti-iconicity and the diachronic filter. In Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.), 396–428. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003a Typologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 203–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b Introduction: Comparative Non-Pama-Nyungan and Australian historical linguistics. In The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia: Comparative Studies of the Continent’s Most Linguistically Complex Region, Nicholas Evans (ed.), 3–25. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009 Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at conference on Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change , Osaka, Museum of Ethnography, March.
Fujii, Seiko
1992 On the idiomaticity of conditional constructions in Japanese. In CIL1992: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Linguists, André Crochetiere, Jean-Claude Boulanger & Conrad Ouellon (eds), 59–62. Québec: Les Presses De l’Université Lavel.Google Scholar
2000 A corpus-based study of reduced conditionals in Japanese conversation. In Selected papers from AILA’99 Tokyo. Proceedings of the 1999 International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Tokyo: Waseda Univesity Press.Google Scholar
2004 Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types. The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 121–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garde, Murray
2013 Culture, Interaction and Person Reference in an Australian Language [Culture in Language Use. Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
2008 Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. Amerindia 32: 57–75.Google Scholar
Givón, Tom
2015 The Diachrony of Grammar, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gras, Pedro
2011 Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona. [URL]Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2011 On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
1996 Post-Saussurean linguistics: Towards an integrated theory of language. In (N)WAVES and MEANS: A selection of papers from NWAVE 24 [University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3:1], Miriam Meyerhoff (ed.), 1–24.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1976 The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 78–105. Canberra: AIATSIS.Google Scholar
1982 Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst, Steven Swartz (ed.), 217–315. Darwin: SIL-AAB.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984 Grammaticalisation and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey
2005 The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2014 Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4): 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1997 Territory of Information [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2007 Discourse structure. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 301-371. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra
1983 Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian languages, Vol. 3, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry Blake (eds), 191–304. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1968 Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985 Grammaticalization. Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303-318.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988 Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffmann’s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffmann. Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wooton (eds), 161–227. Abingdon: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2006 On the human “interaction engine”. In Enfield & Levinson, 39–69.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2003 “Pragmaticizzazione” dell’incompletezza sintattica nell’italiano parlato: Le ipotetiche sospese. In Il parlato italiano, Federico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: Atti del Convegno Nazionale, D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
2004 Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditions in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar
2005 Come era il parlato di lingue antiche: Le ipotetiche libere. Studi Italiani di Linguistica e Applicata 2: 225–255.Google Scholar
2009 Ipotetiche libere nel non parlato. In Sintassi storica e sincronica dell'italiano: Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione (Atti del X Congresso Internazionale SILFI, Basilea, giugno-luglio 2008), Angela Ferrari (ed.), 1333–1355. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
2010 Free conditionals in discourse: The forming of a construction. Linguisticae Investigationes 33(1): 50–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mal’čukov, Andrej
2013 Verbalisation and insubordination in Siberian languages. In Shared Grammaticalization. With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1982 How Lardil became accusative. Lingua 55:141–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity
2016 No fixed address: The locative in insubordinate clauses in Gurindji Kriol. In Loss and Renewal: Australian Languages since Colonisation, Felicity Meakins & Carmel O’Shannessy (eds), 367–396. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 81(1): 69–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montolío, Estrella
1999 ¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre construcciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo. Oralia 2: 37–70.Google Scholar
Núñez-Lagos, Carmen
2005 Le signifiant espagnol que: Quel signifié? PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne-Paris 4.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1996 Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra.A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Framing effect in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. Berkeley Linguistic Society 23: 471–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L.
2005 Motivation and convention in some speech act constructions: A cognitive linguistic approach. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, Sophia Marmaridou, Kiki Nikiforidou & Eleni Antonopoulou (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda
2011 Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses: A case study from German. In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion [Human Cognitive Processing 32], Mario Brdar, Stefan T. Gries & Milena Fuchs (eds), 87–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1999 Semantics. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Robert A. Wilan & Frank C. Keil (eds), 739–742. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2009 Insubordination in Altaic. Journal of Philology . Ural-Altaic Studies 1: 61–79.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María
2008 Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 21: 269–288.Google Scholar
Round, Erich
2012 Kayardild Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila
2008 An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel
1982 Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh!’ and other things that come between sentences. In Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schlobinski, Peter
n.d. The function of non-embedded daß-clauses in therapeutic discourse. Ms.
Schwenter, Scott
1996 The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8(2): 316–351.Google Scholar
1999 Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si. Annuari de Filologia XXI(9): 87–100.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2010 Espaces instables entre coordination et subordination. In La parataxe, Marie-José Béguelin, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf (eds), 231–254. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1999 Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
2012 A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36: 123–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weuster, Edith
1983 Nicht-eingebettete Nebensätze mit Verb-Endstellung. Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen, Klaus Olszok and Edith Weuster (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David
1988 Switch-reference in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Form, function and problems of identity. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], Peter Austin (ed.), 141–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick
2011 Introduction. Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
audio

Example 21

Example 22

Example 23

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2022. Can temporal clauses be insubordinate?. Interactional Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Dér, Csilla Ilona
2022. Háthogy esetleg netalántán azt gondolnátok rólam.... Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 9:1 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2021. Conditional clauses as polite modifiers in Latin: si placet between pragmaticalization and language contact. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2019. Combinaciones entre operadores argumentativos. Spanish in Context 16:2 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina & Víctor Pérez Béjar
2023. Chapter 9. Que conste/sepas and como si constructions in Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2022. Si vous avez quelqu’un sous la main  : les si-indépendantes en tant que format de requête. Langue française N° 216:4 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
2022. The insubordinated infinitive in Makhuwa-Enahara and the expression of feelings. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Labiano, Mikel
2023. Griego antiguo εἰ μή … γε. Respuesta no preferida replicativa e insubordinación. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 33 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Jim & Andreea S. Calude
2020. Speaking and Writing English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Németh T., Enikő, Éva Szabó, Dorina Császár, Renáta Gera & Tamara Béres
2022. Esettanulmány a vizuális modalitású nem verbális viselkedés multimodális kommunikációban betöltött szerepéről. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 9:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Shagal, Ksenia, Pavel Rudnev & Anna Volkova
2022. Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms: an introduction. Folia Linguistica 56:3 ► pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Fonctionnement macro-syntaxique et dimension anaphorique des relatives produites post hoc  : une analyse interactionnelle et multimodale. Langue française N° 210:2 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Visapää, Laura
2022. Infinitives of affect and intersubjectivity: on the indexical interpretation of the Finnish independent infinitives. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 521 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.