Part of
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 138
Bello, Andrés
(1847) 1984Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Madrid: EDAF.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2016Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure: Convergence and divergence. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Tyological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blythe, Joe
2009Doing Referring in Murriny Patha Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
2013Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language 89(4): 883–919. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, Rita
2009Metonymy in indirect directives: Stand-alone conditionals in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian. In Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar [Human Cognitive Processing 25], Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Antonio Barcelona (eds), 323–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buscha, Annerose
1976Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.Google Scholar
Cable, Seth
2011Insubordination in Tlingit: An areal effect? Northwest Journal of Linguistics 5(1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie
2006La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue 28: 119–132.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, Jeanne-Marie, Deulofeu, Henri-José & Martin, Philippe
2008Pour une syntaxe sans ellipse. In Ellipse et effacement: Du schème de phrase aux règles discursives, Jean-Christophe Pitavy & Michèle Bigot (eds), 225–246. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint Étienne.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan & Evans, Nicholas
1988Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deulofeu, José
1988La syntaxe de que en français parlé et le problème de la subordination. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 8: 79–104.Google Scholar
1999Problèmes méthodologiques de l’analyse morphosyntaxique de que en français contemporain. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 15: 163–198.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick & Levinson, Stephen C.
(eds) 2006Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1985A Grammar of Kayardild, with Historical-comparative Notes on Tangkic. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
1988Odd topic marking in Kayardild. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], Peter Austin (ed.), 219–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Code, inference, placedness and ellipsis. In The Role of Theory in Linguistic Description, William A. Foley (ed.), 243–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995aA Grammar of Kayardild. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995bMultiple case in Kayardild: Anti-iconicity and the diachronic filter. In Double Case. Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.), 396–428. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003aTypologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 203–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003bIntroduction: Comparative Non-Pama-Nyungan and Australian historical linguistics. In The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia: Comparative Studies of the Continent’s Most Linguistically Complex Region, Nicholas Evans (ed.), 3–25. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at conference on Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change , Osaka, Museum of Ethnography, March.
Fujii, Seiko
1992On the idiomaticity of conditional constructions in Japanese. In CIL1992: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Linguists, André Crochetiere, Jean-Claude Boulanger & Conrad Ouellon (eds), 59–62. Québec: Les Presses De l’Université Lavel.Google Scholar
2000A corpus-based study of reduced conditionals in Japanese conversation. In Selected papers from AILA’99 Tokyo. Proceedings of the 1999 International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Tokyo: Waseda Univesity Press.Google Scholar
2004Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types. The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 2], Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds), 121–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garde, Murray
2013Culture, Interaction and Person Reference in an Australian Language [Culture in Language Use. Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
2008Explaining similarities between main clauses and nominalized phrases. Amerindia 32: 57–75.Google Scholar
Givón, Tom
2015The Diachrony of Grammar, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gras, Pedro
2011Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona. [URL]Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2011On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
1996Post-Saussurean linguistics: Towards an integrated theory of language. In (N)WAVES and MEANS: A selection of papers from NWAVE 24 [University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 3:1], Miriam Meyerhoff (ed.), 1–24.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1976The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 78–105. Canberra: AIATSIS.Google Scholar
1982Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In Memory of Lothar Jagst, Steven Swartz (ed.), 217–315. Darwin: SIL-AAB.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984Grammaticalisation and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Raymond, Geoffrey
2005The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2014Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language 90(4): 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1997Territory of Information [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2007Discourse structure. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 2: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 301-371. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra
1983Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian languages, Vol. 3, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry Blake (eds), 191–304. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1968Abstract Syntax and Latin Complementation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization. Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303-318.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffmann’s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffmann. Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wooton (eds), 161–227. Abingdon: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2006On the human “interaction engine”. In Enfield & Levinson, 39–69.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2003“Pragmaticizzazione” dell’incompletezza sintattica nell’italiano parlato: Le ipotetiche sospese. In Il parlato italiano, Federico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: Atti del Convegno Nazionale, D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
2004Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditions in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar
2005Come era il parlato di lingue antiche: Le ipotetiche libere. Studi Italiani di Linguistica e Applicata 2: 225–255.Google Scholar
2009Ipotetiche libere nel non parlato. In Sintassi storica e sincronica dell'italiano: Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione (Atti del X Congresso Internazionale SILFI, Basilea, giugno-luglio 2008), Angela Ferrari (ed.), 1333–1355. Firenze: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
2010Free conditionals in discourse: The forming of a construction. Linguisticae Investigationes 33(1): 50–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mal’čukov, Andrej
2013Verbalisation and insubordination in Siberian languages. In Shared Grammaticalization. With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
1982How Lardil became accusative. Lingua 55:141–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, Felicity
2016No fixed address: The locative in insubordinate clauses in Gurindji Kriol. In Loss and Renewal: Australian Languages since Colonisation, Felicity Meakins & Carmel O’Shannessy (eds), 367–396. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 81(1): 69–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montolío, Estrella
1999¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre construcciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo. Oralia 2: 37–70.Google Scholar
Núñez-Lagos, Carmen
2005Le signifiant espagnol que: Quel signifié? PhD dissertation, Université Sorbonne-Paris 4.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1996Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra.A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Framing effect in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. Berkeley Linguistic Society 23: 471–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L.
2005Motivation and convention in some speech act constructions: A cognitive linguistic approach. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, Sophia Marmaridou, Kiki Nikiforidou & Eleni Antonopoulou (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda
2011Emotion and desire in independent complement clauses: A case study from German. In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion [Human Cognitive Processing 32], Mario Brdar, Stefan T. Gries & Milena Fuchs (eds), 87–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1999Semantics. In The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Robert A. Wilan & Frank C. Keil (eds), 739–742. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2009Insubordination in Altaic. Journal of Philology . Ural-Altaic Studies 1: 61–79.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María
2008Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 21: 269–288.Google Scholar
Round, Erich
2012Kayardild Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila
2008An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel
1982Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh!’ and other things that come between sentences. In Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, Deborah Tannen (ed.), 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schlobinski, Peter
n.d. The function of non-embedded daß-clauses in therapeutic discourse. Ms.
Schwenter, Scott
1996The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8(2): 316–351.Google Scholar
1999Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si. Annuari de Filologia XXI(9): 87–100.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2010Espaces instables entre coordination et subordination. In La parataxe, Marie-José Béguelin, Mathieu Avanzi & Gilles Corminboeuf (eds), 231–254. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1999Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English. In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
2012A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36: 123–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weuster, Edith
1983Nicht-eingebettete Nebensätze mit Verb-Endstellung. Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen, Klaus Olszok and Edith Weuster (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David
1988Switch-reference in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Form, function and problems of identity. In Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15], Peter Austin (ed.), 141–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick
2011Introduction. Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Example 21

Example 22

Example 23

Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2022. Can temporal clauses be insubordinate?. Interactional Linguistics 2:2  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Dér, Csilla Ilona
2022. Háthogy esetleg netalántán azt gondolnátok rólam.... Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 9:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2021. Conditional clauses as polite modifiers in Latin: si placet between pragmaticalization and language contact. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3  pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2019. Combinaciones entre operadores argumentativos. Spanish in Context 16:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina & Víctor Pérez Béjar
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2022. Si vous avez quelqu’un sous la main  : les si-indépendantes en tant que format de requête. Langue française N° 216:4  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
2022. The insubordinated infinitive in Makhuwa-Enahara and the expression of feelings. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Labiano, Mikel
2023. Griego antiguo εἰ μή … γε. Respuesta no preferida replicativa e insubordinación. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 33  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Jim & Andreea S. Calude
2020. Speaking and Writing English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Németh T., Enikő, Éva Szabó, Dorina Császár, Renáta Gera & Tamara Béres
2022. Esettanulmány a vizuális modalitású nem verbális viselkedés multimodális kommunikációban betöltött szerepéről. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 9:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Shagal, Ksenia, Pavel Rudnev & Anna Volkova
2022. Multifunctionality and syncretism in non-finite forms: an introduction. Folia Linguistica 56:3  pp. 529 ff. DOI logo
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Fonctionnement macro-syntaxique et dimension anaphorique des relatives produites post hoc  : une analyse interactionnelle et multimodale. Langue française N° 210:2  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Visapää, Laura
2022. Infinitives of affect and intersubjectivity: on the indexical interpretation of the Finnish independent infinitives. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3  pp. 521 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.