Chapter 2. On insubordination and cooptation
Bernd Heine | Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität zu Köln, Germany
Tania Kuteva | University of Düsseldorf | SOAS, University of London
The chapter is concerned more generally with what, following Evans (2007), we call insubordinated (or insubordinate) clauses, that is, with the conventionalized main clause use of what, prima facie, appear to be formally subordinate clauses. Insubordinated clauses are, as we argue here, information units that are coopted from a construction type [matrix clause – subordinate clause] where the matrix clause is implied but not formally expressed. Based on recent findings on discourse grammar analysis (Kaltenböck et al. 2011; Heine et al. 2013), three basic types of insubordinated clauses are distinguished and the nature of such clauses is accounted for with reference to the mechanism of cooptation from one domain of grammar to another.
References
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “I think” – an English modal particle.
Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives,
Toril Swan &
Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2011 From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish.
Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855–874.


Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne
2005 Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In
Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, [
Linguistik - Impulse & Tendenzen 9],
Torsten Leuschner,
Tanja Mortelmans &
Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335–362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.


Bayer, Klaus
1973 Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthese in Texten.
Deutsche Sprache 1: 64–115.

Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brinton, Laurel J
2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development [
Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP.


Buscha, Annerose
1976 Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Satz.
Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.

D’Hertefelt, Sarah
2013 Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper presented at
Compex Sentences International Workshop
, Leuven, 16 November.
de Vries, Mark
n.d.
The syntax of nonsubordination: Parenthesis, appositions and grafts. Unpublished MS.
Dér, Csilla Ilona
2010 On the status of discourse markers.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(1): 3–28.


Dik, Simon C
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions [
Functional Grammar Series 21]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele
1980 Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.

Espinal, M. Teresa
1991 The representation of disjunct constituents.
Language 67: 726–762.


Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In
Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations,
Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.

Evans, Nicholas
2009 Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at
Methodologies in Determining Syntactic Change Conference
, Osaka, March.
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006 A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In
Approaches to Discourse Particles,
Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Fujii, Seiko
2012 Insubordination of conditional constructions in Japanese. Paper presented at the
symposium on Dynamics of Insubordination, Research Institut for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa
, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, October 25–28.
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2005 The Pragmatic Marker – Discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course
. PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.

Grenoble, Lenore
2004 Theticals in Russian.
Journal of Pragmatics 36(11): 1953–1974.


Haegeman, Liliane
2003 Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax.
Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339.


Heine, Bernd
2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.


Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania
2015 Some observations on the evolution of utterance-final particles. In
Final Particles, [
Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 284].
Sylvie Hancil,
Alexander Haselow &
Margje Post (eds), 111–140. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
2013 An outline of discourse grammar. In
Functional Approaches to Language,
Shannon Bischoff &
Carmen Jany (eds), 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
2015 On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. In
Oxford Handbooks Online in Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.


Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007 The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction [
Studies in the Evolution of Language 9]. Oxford: OUP.

Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania & Kaltenböck, Gunther
2014 Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations.
Language and Cognition 6(1): 146–80.


Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.


Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2011 Functional Discourse Grammar. In
The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis,
Bernd Heine &
Heiko Narrog (eds), 367–400. Oxford: OUP.

Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.


Kac, Michael B
1972 Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because
.
Language 48(3): 626–632.


Kaltenböck, Gunther
2007 Spoken thetical clauses in English. In
Parentheticals [
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106],
Nicole Dehé &
Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 25–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
Kavalova, Yordanka
2007
And-parenthetical clauses. In
Parentheticals [
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106],
Nicole Dehé &
Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 145–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972 The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax.
Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.

Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Language Form. Cambridge: CUP.

McGregor, William B
1997 Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence.
Language 84(1): 69–119.


Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
1998 The semantic status of discourse markers.
Lingua 104(3-4): 235–260.


Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
2008 Particles at the Semantics/pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues.
A Study with Special Reference to the French Phrasal Adverbs. Oxford: Elsevier.

Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Pittner, Karin
1995 Zur Syntax von Parenthesen.
Linguistische Berichte 156: 85–108.

Rhee, Seongha
2002 From silence to grammar: Grammaticalization and ellipsis in Korean. Paper presented at the
conference on New Reflections on Grammaticalization II
, University of Amsterdam, April 3–6.
Rutherford, William W
1970 Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English.
Language 46(1): 97–115.


Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987 The thetic/categorical distinction revisited.
Linguistics 25: 511–580.


Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2006 Theticity. In
Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe,
Giuliano Bernini &
Marcia L. Schwartz (eds), 255–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Siepmann, Dirk
2005 Discourse Markers across Languages: A Contrastive Study of Second-level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. Abingdon: Routledge.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change [
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 96]. Cambridge: CUP.

Van Valin Jr., Robert D
2007 Recent developments in the Role and Reference Grammar theory of clause linkage.
Language and Linguistics 8: 71–93.

Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, Sarah D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
Wehr, Barbara
2000 Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des français parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In
Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch,
Barbara Wehr &
Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239–289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Weuster, Edith
1983 Nicht-eingebettete Nebensätze mit Verb-Endstellung.
Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen [
Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 20],
Klaus Olszok &
Edith Weuster (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
1993 Linguistic form and relevance.
Lingua 90: 1–25.


Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022.
On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean.
Lingua 274
► pp. 103230 ff.

Farahani, Mehrdad Vasheghani & Zahra Ghane
2022.
Unpacking the function(s) of discourse markers in academic spoken English: a corpus-based study.
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 45:1
► pp. 49 ff.

Ghane, Zahra & Mehrdad Vasheghani Farahani
2022.
Function and translation of the thetical you know: a parallel corpus-based investigation of English and Persian.
Corpora 17:3
► pp. 363 ff.

Heine, Bernd
2023.
The Grammar of Interactives,

Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
Kaltenböck, Gunther
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022.
Insubordinate if-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence.
Open Linguistics 8:1
► pp. 675 ff.

Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,

la Roi, Ezra
2021.
The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology.
Symbolae Osloenses 95:1
► pp. 2 ff.

2022.
Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: commands, requests, wishes and assertives.
Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:1
► pp. 23 ff.

Lastres–López, Cristina
2020.
Subordination and insubordination in contemporary spoken English.
English Today 36:2
► pp. 48 ff.

McGregor, William B.
Wang, Xiaoyun
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.
Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.