The chapter is concerned more generally with what, following Evans (2007), we call insubordinated (or insubordinate) clauses, that is, with the conventionalized main clause use of what, prima facie, appear to be formally subordinate clauses. Insubordinated clauses are, as we argue here, information units that are coopted from a construction type [matrix clause – subordinate clause] where the matrix clause is implied but not formally expressed. Based on recent findings on discourse grammar analysis (Kaltenböck et al. 2011; Heine et al. 2013), three basic types of insubordinated clauses are distinguished and the nature of such clauses is accounted for with reference to the mechanism of cooptation from one domain of grammar to another.
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think” – an English modal particle. Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Arroyo, José Luis Blas. 2011. From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855–874.
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, [Linguistik - Impulse & Tendenzen 9], Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335–362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bayer, Klaus1973. Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthese in Texten. Deutsche Sprache 1: 64–115.
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP.
Buscha, Annerose. 1976. Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Satz. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.
D’Hertefelt, Sarah. 2013. Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper presented at
Compex Sentences International Workshop
, Leuven, 16 November.
de Vries, Mark. n.d. The syntax of nonsubordination: Parenthesis, appositions and grafts. Unpublished MS.
Dér, Csilla Ilona. 2010. On the status of discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(1): 3–28.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions [Functional Grammar Series 21]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele. 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726–762.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.
Evans, Nicholas. 2009. Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at
Methodologies in Determining Syntactic Change Conference
, Osaka, March.
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fujii, Seiko. 2012. Insubordination of conditional constructions in Japanese. Paper presented at the
symposium on Dynamics of Insubordination, Research Institut for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa
, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, October 25–28.
Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2005. The Pragmatic Marker – Discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course. PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.
Grenoble, Lenore. 2004. Theticals in Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11): 1953–1974.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339.
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania. 2015. Some observations on the evolution of utterance-final particles. In Final Particles, [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 284]. Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 111–140. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2015. On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. In Oxford Handbooks Online in Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction [Studies in the Evolution of Language 9]. Oxford: OUP.
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania & Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6(1): 146–80.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2011. Functional Discourse Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 367–400. Oxford: OUP.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kac, Michael B. 1972. Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because. Language 48(3): 626–632.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2007. Spoken thetical clauses in English. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 25–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–893.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Language Form. Cambridge: CUP.
McGregor, William B. 1997. Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69–119.
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt. 1998. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3-4): 235–260.
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt. 2008. Particles at the Semantics/pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phrasal Adverbs. Oxford: Elsevier.
Pittner, Karin. 1995. Zur Syntax von Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 156: 85–108.
Rhee, Seongha. 2002. From silence to grammar: Grammaticalization and ellipsis in Korean. Paper presented at the
conference on New Reflections on Grammaticalization II
, University of Amsterdam, April 3–6.
Rouchota, Villy. 1998. Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 97–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rutherford, William W. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97–115.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511–580.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2006. Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds), 255–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siepmann, Dirk. 2005. Discourse Markers across Languages: A Contrastive Study of Second-level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. Abingdon: Routledge.
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1998. From sentence to discourse: Cos (because) in teenage talk. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 127–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 96]. Cambridge: CUP.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 2007. Recent developments in the Role and Reference Grammar theory of clause linkage. Language and Linguistics 8: 71–93.
Wehr, Barbara. 2000. Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des français parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239–289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Weuster, Edith. 1983. Nicht-eingebettete Nebensätze mit Verb-Endstellung. Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen [Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 20], Klaus Olszok & Edith Weuster (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1–25.
2022. On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean. Lingua 274 ► pp. 103230 ff.
Farahani, Mehrdad Vasheghani & Zahra Ghane
2022. Unpacking the function(s) of discourse markers in academic spoken English: a corpus-based study. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 45:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Ghane, Zahra & Mehrdad Vasheghani Farahani
2022. Function and translation of the thetical you know: a parallel corpus-based investigation of English and Persian. Corpora 17:3 ► pp. 363 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff.
Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1 ► pp. 2 ff.
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: commands, requests, wishes and assertives. Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.