Part of
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 3964
References
Aijmer, Karin
1997“I think” – an English modal particle. Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen-Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2011From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855–874. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Günthner, Susanne
2005Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, [ Linguistik - Impulse & Tendenzen 9], Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds), 335–362. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Klaus
1973Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthese in Texten. Deutsche Sprache 1: 64–115.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buscha, Annerose
1976Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Satz. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.Google Scholar
D’Hertefelt, Sarah
2013Independent conditional clauses in Germanic languages. Paper presented at Compex Sentences International Workshop , Leuven, 16 November.
de Vries, Mark
n.d. The syntax of nonsubordination: Parenthesis, appositions and grafts. Unpublished MS.
2007Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dér, Csilla Ilona
2010On the status of discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions [Functional Grammar Series 21]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald & Bourcier, Daniele
1980Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa
1991The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at Methodologies in Determining Syntactic Change Conference , Osaka, March.
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fujii, Seiko
2012Insubordination of conditional constructions in Japanese. Paper presented at the symposium on Dynamics of Insubordination, Research Institut for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa , Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, October 25–28.
Furkó, Bálint Péter
2005The Pragmatic Marker – Discourse Marker Dichotomy Reconsidered: The Case of well and of course . PhD dissertation, Debreceni Egyetem, Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Debrecen.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore
2004Theticals in Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11): 1953–1974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2003Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania
2015Some observations on the evolution of utterance-final particles. In Final Particles, [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 284]. Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 111–140. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping
2013An outline of discourse grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. In Oxford Handbooks Online in Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction [Studies in the Evolution of Language 9]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania & Kaltenböck, Gunther
2014Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6(1): 146–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Functional Discourse Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 367–400. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kac, Michael B
1972Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because . Language 48(3): 626–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2007Spoken thetical clauses in English. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 25–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavalova, Yordanka
2007 And-parenthetical clauses. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 145–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Language Form. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
1998The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3-4): 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Particles at the Semantics/pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phrasal Adverbs. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
Ohori, Toshio
1995Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew
2009Grammarians’ languages versus humanists’ languages and the place of speech act formulas in models of linguistic competence. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change [Typological Studies in Language 82], Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin
1995Zur Syntax von Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 156: 85–108.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2002From silence to grammar: Grammaticalization and ellipsis in Korean. Paper presented at the conference on New Reflections on Grammaticalization II , University of Amsterdam, April 3–6.
Rouchota, Villy
1998Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 97–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, William W
1970Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46(1): 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Theticity. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds), 255–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siepmann, Dirk
2005Discourse Markers across Languages: A Contrastive Study of Second-level Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native Text with Implications for General and Pedagogic Lexicography. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1998From sentence to discourse: Cos (because) in teenage talk. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 127–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B
2002Regularity in Semantic Change [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 96]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D
2007Recent developments in the Role and Reference Grammar theory of clause linkage. Language and Linguistics 8: 71–93.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, Sarah D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Van linden, An
2012A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language 36: 123–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehr, Barbara
2000Zur Beschreibung der Syntax des français parlé (mit einem Exkurs zu “thetisch” und “kategorisch”). In Diskursanalyse: Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Französisch, Barbara Wehr & Helga Thomaßen (eds), 239–289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Weuster, Edith
1983Nicht-eingebettete Nebensätze mit Verb-Endstellung. Zur Wortstellungsproblematik im Deutschen [Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 20], Klaus Olszok & Edith Weuster (eds), 7–87. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2022. On the extended uses of -ki and -m nominalization constructions as face-threat mitigators in Korean. Lingua 274  pp. 103230 ff. DOI logo
Farahani, Mehrdad Vasheghani & Zahra Ghane
2022. Unpacking the function(s) of discourse markers in academic spoken English: a corpus-based study. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 45:1  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Ghane, Zahra & Mehrdad Vasheghani Farahani
2022. Function and translation of the thetical you know: a parallel corpus-based investigation of English and Persian. Corpora 17:3  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Are there two different ways of approaching grammaticalization?. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
2023. The Grammar of Interactives, DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
2020. On the status of wh-exclamatives in English. Functions of Language 27:2  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2021. Chapter 1. On the rise of discourse markers. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219],  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016. On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinate if-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
2022. The insubordinated infinitive in Makhuwa-Enahara and the expression of feelings. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
2022. Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: commands, requests, wishes and assertives. Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Lastres–López, Cristina
2020. Subordination and insubordination in contemporary spoken English. English Today 36:2  pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
McGregor, William B.
2017. There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage. English Text Construction 10:2  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xiaoyun
2020. Managing a suspended course of action. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:2  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019. Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.