Article published in:
Insubordination
Edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe
[Typological Studies in Language 115] 2016
► pp. 145–170

Chapter 6. Insubordinated conditionals in spoken and non-spoken Italian

| Università Roma Tre
In this chapter, Italian free conditionals are located within the general framework of Insubordination (Evans 2007). By means of the data contained in spoken and non-spoken Italian corpora, a series of questions related to the issue are addressed. The question regarding the extent to which the use of such constructions can be considered conventionalized is answered by considering the frequency of the construction as compared to the general frequency of if-clauses; its different diffusion in spoken and written uses and, among them, dialogic vs. non-dialogic situations; intonation patterns, conveying a series of pragmatic functions and characterizing if-clauses without an (overt) main clause as specific speech acts; conventionalization of meaning and function.The hypothesis that in language there may be a permanent tendency to creating insubordinated conditionals is explored in relation to such pressures as phonetical economy, communicative economy/ergonomy exploiting vagueness, the politeness function of “being incomplete”, and the possible preference for the iconic order “cause-consequence”.
Published online: 18 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.06val
References
Almela Pérez, Ramón
1985 El si introductor de oraciones independientes en español. Lingüistica Española Actual 7: 5–13.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Buscha, Anna
1976 Isolierte Nebensätze im dialogischen Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 13: 274–279.Google Scholar
C–Oral-Rom = Cresti, Emanuela & Moneglia, Massimo (eds) 2005 C–Oral-Rom. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Firenzuoli, V
2003 Le forme intonative di valore illocutivo dell’italiano parlato. Analisi sperimentale di un corpus di parlato spontaneo (LABLITA). Tesi di Dottorato, Università degli Studi di Firenze.Google Scholar
LIP = de Mauro, Tullio, Mancini, Federico,Vedovelli, Massimo & Voghera, Miriam 1993 Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato. Milano: ETAS libri. http://​badip​.uni​-graz​.at​/en​/searchGoogle Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2003 “Pragmaticizzazione” dell’incompletezza sintattica nell’italiano parlato: le ipotetiche sospese. In Il parlato italiano, Federico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: Atti del Convegno Nazionale, D’Auria Editore.Google Scholar
2004 Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 17: 189–215.Google Scholar
2005 Come era il parlato di lingue antiche: Le ipotetiche libere. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 2: 225–255.Google Scholar
2006 Ipotetiche libere e grammaticalizzazione in corso nel parlato. In Lingua e dialetto nell’Italia del Duemila, Alberto Sobrero & Annarita Miglietta (eds), 49–75. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
2009 Ipotetiche libere nel non parlato. Sintassi storica e sincronica dell'italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione (Atti del X Congresso Internazionale SILFI, Basilea, giugno-luglio 2008), Angela Ferrari (ed.), 1333–1355. Firenze: Cesati.Google Scholar
2010 Free conditionals in discourse: The forming of a construction. Linguisticae Investigationes 33(1): 50–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luzi, Eleonora
2008 Ipotetiche libere: Il ruolo dell’intonazione nell’interpretazione pragmatica. Doctoral work in progress, Università Roma Tre, Dottorato in Linguistica diacronica, sincronica e applicata - XXIII ciclo - Relatore prof. E Lombardi Vallauri.Google Scholar
Montolío Durán, Estrella
1999 ¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre construcciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo. Oralia 2: 37–69.Google Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1996 Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha
2002 From silence to grammar: Grammaticalization and ellipsis in Korean. Paper presented at the conference: “New Reflexions on Grammaticalization II” , Amsterdam, 3–6 April.
Rudolph, Elisabeth
1981 Zur Problematik der Konnektive des kausalen Bereichs. In Konnektivausdrücke, Konnektiveinheiten, Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten 1 [ Papers in Textlinguistics 30], Johannes Fritsche (ed.), 146–244. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott
1996 The pragmatics of independent si-clauses in Spanish. Hispanic Linguistics 8: 316–351.Google Scholar
1999 Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si . Annuari de Filologia 21: 87–100.Google Scholar
2000 Viewpoints and polysemy: Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds), 257–281. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Expectations and (in)sufficiency: Spanish como-conditionals. Linguistics 39(4): 733–760. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Discourse markers and the PA/SN distinction. Journal of Linguistics 38: 43–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
2006 Constructions: Types, niveaux, force pragmatique. À la quête du sens: Études littéraires, historiques et linguistiques en hommage à Christiane Marchello-Nizia, Céline Guillot, Serge Heiden & Sophie Prévost (eds), 137–159. Lyon: ENS.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1998 Isolated if-clauses in Australian English. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
1985 Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text 5(1-2): 55–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

audio

Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

No author info given
2022.  In Introduction to Cognitive Pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice, 4], Crossref logo
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
2017. Examining the Concept of Subordination in Spoken L1 and L2 English: The Case of If -Clauses. TESOL Quarterly 51:4 ► pp. 897 ff. Crossref logo
Bossaglia, Giulia, Heliana Mello & Tommaso Raso
2020.  In In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Fedriani, Chiara
2021.  Conditional clauses as polite modifiers in Latin: si placet between pragmaticalization and language contact . Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3 ► pp. 346 ff. Crossref logo
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2017. Exclamatives in the functional typology of insubordination: Evidence from complement insubordinate constructions in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 115 ► pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.