Article published in:
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 105–120

Noun-modifying clauses in Cantonese

Whether relative clauses can be identified in Chinese is a recurrent question. We ask whether relative clauses are distinct from other noun-modifying clause constructions in Cantonese, one of many East Asian languages in which a noun can be preceded by a diverse range of modifying clauses. The relationship between head noun and modifying clause may be a grammatical one, with the head noun being understood as an argument or an adjunct of the modifying clause; or its interpretation may be dependent on semantic and pragmatic factors. We conclude that Cantonese has a General Noun-Modifying Clause Construction as proposed for Japanese (Matsumoto et al., this volume), with relative clauses forming a subset of modifying clauses in which a grammatical relation obtains.
Keywords: Cantonese, relative clauses, noun modification, typology, resumptive pronouns
Published online: 28 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.06mat
References

References

Chan, Angel Wing-Shan, Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2011 The acquisition of relative clauses in Cantonese and Mandarin. In The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Processing, Typology and Function [Trends in Language Acquisition 8], Evan Kidd (ed.), 197–224 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint
2006 A Chinese relative. In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 69–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1998 Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–86.Google Scholar
2008a The areal typology of Chinese: Between North and Southeast Asia. In Chinese Linguistics in Leipzig [Collection des Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 12], Redouane Djamouri, Barbara Meisterernst & Rint Sybesma (eds), 1–21. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.Google Scholar
2008b Prenominal relative clauses in verb-object languages. Language and Linguistics 9: 723–733.Google Scholar
Francis, Elaine J., Lam, Charles, Zheng, Carol Chun, Hitz, John & Matthews, Stephen
2015 Resumptive pronouns, structural complexity, and the elusive distinction between grammar and performance: Evidence from Cantonese. Lingua 162: 52–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, Yuan-Jian
2007 Headless relatives in Cantonese: A derivational account. In Studies in Cantonese Linguistics 2, Joanna Ut-Seong Sio & Sze-Wing Tang (eds), 17–32. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard
1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal Grammar. Linguistic 1nquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2007 Integrating frames: Complex noun phrase constructions in Japanese. In Aspects of Linguistics: In Honor of Noriko Akatsuka (Gengogaku No syosoo: Akatsuka Noriko kyoozyu kinen ronbunsyuu), Susumu Kuno, Seiichi Makino & Susan Strauss (eds), 131–154. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen
2006 Cantonese grammar in areal perspective. In Grammars in Contact, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 220–236. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yeung, Louisa Y.Y.
2001 Processing motivations for topicalization in Cantonese. In Cognitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context, Kaoru Horie & Shigeru Sato (eds), 81–102. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2001 The structure and stratification of relative clauses in contemporary Cantonese. In Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Hilary Chappell (ed.), 266–281. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011 Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ning, Chunyan
1993 The Overt Syntax of Relativization and Topicalization in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing, Fan, Kwok, Lee, Thomas H.T., Lun, Suen, Luke, Kang-Kwong, Tung, Chi-Sun & Cheung, Kwan-Hin
2002 Guide to LSHK Cantonese Romanization of Chinese Characters., 2nd edn. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen
2007a Relative clauses in Cantonese-English bilingual children: Typological challenges and processing motivations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 277–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Huang, Jiaying & Caterina Donati
2019. Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Production of Relative Clauses in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
WU, Tong
2021. The general noun-modifying clause construction beyond Eurasia. Linguistic Typology 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.