Article published in:
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 105–120

Noun-modifying clauses in Cantonese

Whether relative clauses can be identified in Chinese is a recurrent question. We ask whether relative clauses are distinct from other noun-modifying clause constructions in Cantonese, one of many East Asian languages in which a noun can be preceded by a diverse range of modifying clauses. The relationship between head noun and modifying clause may be a grammatical one, with the head noun being understood as an argument or an adjunct of the modifying clause; or its interpretation may be dependent on semantic and pragmatic factors. We conclude that Cantonese has a General Noun-Modifying Clause Construction as proposed for Japanese (Matsumoto et al., this volume), with relative clauses forming a subset of modifying clauses in which a grammatical relation obtains.
Keywords: Cantonese, relative clauses, noun modification, typology, resumptive pronouns
Published online: 28 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.06mat
References

References

Chan, Angel Wing-Shan, Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2011 The acquisition of relative clauses in Cantonese and Mandarin. In The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Processing, Typology and Function [Trends in Language Acquisition 8], Evan Kidd (ed.), 197–224 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint
2006 A Chinese relative. In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 69–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1998 Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–86.Google Scholar
2008a The areal typology of Chinese: Between North and Southeast Asia. In Chinese Linguistics in Leipzig [Collection des Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 12], Redouane Djamouri, Barbara Meisterernst & Rint Sybesma (eds), 1–21. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.Google Scholar
2008b Prenominal relative clauses in verb-object languages. Language and Linguistics 9: 723–733.Google Scholar
Francis, Elaine J., Lam, Charles, Zheng, Carol Chun, Hitz, John & Matthews, Stephen
2015 Resumptive pronouns, structural complexity, and the elusive distinction between grammar and performance: Evidence from Cantonese. Lingua 162: 52–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, Yuan-Jian
2007 Headless relatives in Cantonese: A derivational account. In Studies in Cantonese Linguistics 2, Joanna Ut-Seong Sio & Sze-Wing Tang (eds), 17–32. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard
1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal Grammar. Linguistic 1nquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2007 Integrating frames: Complex noun phrase constructions in Japanese. In Aspects of Linguistics: In Honor of Noriko Akatsuka (Gengogaku No syosoo: Akatsuka Noriko kyoozyu kinen ronbunsyuu), Susumu Kuno, Seiichi Makino & Susan Strauss (eds), 131–154. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen
2006 Cantonese grammar in areal perspective. In Grammars in Contact, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 220–236. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yeung, Louisa Y.Y.
2001 Processing motivations for topicalization in Cantonese. In Cognitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context, Kaoru Horie & Shigeru Sato (eds), 81–102. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2001 The structure and stratification of relative clauses in contemporary Cantonese. In Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Hilary Chappell (ed.), 266–281. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011 Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ning, Chunyan
1993 The Overt Syntax of Relativization and Topicalization in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing, Fan, Kwok, Lee, Thomas H.T., Lun, Suen, Luke, Kang-Kwong, Tung, Chi-Sun & Cheung, Kwan-Hin
2002 Guide to LSHK Cantonese Romanization of Chinese Characters., 2nd edn. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen
2007a Relative clauses in Cantonese-English bilingual children: Typological challenges and processing motivations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 277–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar