Whether relative clauses can be identified in Chinese is a recurrent question. We ask whether relative clauses are distinct from other noun-modifying clause constructions in Cantonese, one of many East Asian languages in which a noun can be preceded by a diverse range of modifying clauses. The relationship between head noun and modifying clause may be a grammatical one, with the head noun being understood as an argument or an adjunct of the modifying clause; or its interpretation may be dependent on semantic and pragmatic factors. We conclude that Cantonese has a General Noun-Modifying Clause Construction as proposed for Japanese (Matsumoto et al., this volume), with relative clauses forming a subset of modifying clauses in which a grammatical relation obtains.
2006A Chinese relative. In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 69–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Comrie, Bernard
1998Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–86.
Comrie, Bernard
2008aThe areal typology of Chinese: Between North and Southeast Asia. In Chinese Linguistics in Leipzig [Collection des Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 12], Redouane Djamouri, Barbara Meisterernst & Rint Sybesma (eds), 1–21. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.
Comrie, Bernard
2008bPrenominal relative clauses in verb-object languages. Language and Linguistics 9: 723–733.
Francis, Elaine J., Lam, Charles, Zheng, Carol Chun, Hitz, John & Matthews, Stephen
2015Resumptive pronouns, structural complexity, and the elusive distinction between grammar and performance: Evidence from Cantonese. Lingua 162: 52–81.
He, Yuan-Jian
2007Headless relatives in Cantonese: A derivational account. In Studies in Cantonese Linguistics 2, Joanna Ut-Seong Sio & Sze-Wing Tang (eds), 17–32. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal Grammar. Linguistic 1nquiry 8: 63–99.
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2007Integrating frames: Complex noun phrase constructions in Japanese. In Aspects of Linguistics: In Honor of Noriko Akatsuka (Gengogaku No syosoo: Akatsuka Noriko kyoozyu kinen ronbunsyuu), Susumu Kuno, Seiichi Makino & Susan Strauss (eds), 131–154. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Matthews, Stephen
2006Cantonese grammar in areal perspective. In Grammars in Contact, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 220–236. Oxford: OUP.
Matthews, Stephen & Yeung, Louisa Y.Y.
2001Processing motivations for topicalization in Cantonese. In Cognitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context, Kaoru Horie & Shigeru Sato (eds), 81–102. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2001The structure and stratification of relative clauses in contemporary Cantonese. In Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Hilary Chappell (ed.), 266–281. Oxford: OUP.
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2011Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Ning, Chunyan
1993The Overt Syntax of Relativization and Topicalization in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.
2002Guide to LSHK Cantonese Romanization of Chinese Characters., 2nd edn. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen
2007aRelative clauses in Cantonese-English bilingual children: Typological challenges and processing motivations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 277–300.
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen
2007bThe Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP.
Chan, Angel, Stephen Matthews, Nicole Tse, Annie Lam, Franklin Chang & Evan Kidd
2021. Revisiting Subject–Object Asymmetry in the Production of Cantonese Relative Clauses: Evidence From Elicited Production in 3-Year-Olds. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Huang, Jiaying & Caterina Donati
2019. Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Production of Relative Clauses in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
WU, Tong
2022. The general noun-modifying clause construction beyond Eurasia. Linguistic Typology 26:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.