Article published in:
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 147–178

The general noun-modifying clause construction in Tundra Nenets and its possible origin

| School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Tundra Nenets (Uralic) exhibits unambiguous relative clauses and sentential complements of nouns, but I show that it also has a previously unstudied but structurally distinct GNMCC. The GNMCC covers a diversity of functions although its usage is restricted in various ways. The paper suggests that it has a direct parallel in the non-sentential domain in terms of its syntactic behaviour, the morphosyntactic expression of the constructional ingredients and the basic semantics: it is modelled after the non-clausal compound-like structure employed for the very general purpose of modifying one noun by reference to another noun. Such modification-by-noun constructions served as a historical source of Tundra Nenets GNMCCs, which emerged when the modifying deverbal noun was reanalysed as heading a clausal domain.
Keywords: noun-noun compounds, modification, reanalysis, deverbal nominals
Published online: 28 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.08nik
References

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Nikolaeva, Irina
2013 Descriptive Typology and Linguistic Theory: A Study in the Morphosyntax of Relative Clauses. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris
1995 Possessive Descriptions. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2011 Possessives and relational nouns. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 1109–1130 Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beck, David
2002 The Typology of Parts of Speech Systems. The Markedness of Adjectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela
1977 On the creation and use of English nominal compounds. Language 55: 810–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraurud, Kari
2001 Possessives with extensive use: A source of definite articles? In Dimensions of Possession [Typological Studies in Language 47], Irène Baron, Michel Herslund & Finn Sørensen (eds), 243–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Roger
1981 Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NPs and the N of NP’. Journal of Linguistics 17: 247–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16(4): 547–593.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2000 Romani genitives in cross-linguistic perspective. In Grammatical Relations in Romani: The Noun Phrase [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 211], Viktor Elšík & Yaron Matras (eds), 123–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laczkó, Tibor
1997 Action nominalization and the possessor function. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44 (3–4): 413–475.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1993 Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard & Segal, Gabriel
1995 Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. P.
(ed.) 2009 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. http://​www​.ethnologue​.com/
Nikolaeva, Irina
1999 Ostyak. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2003 Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification in Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia. Collection of papers, Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds), 130–145. Izhevsk: Udmurt State University, and Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
2005 Modifier-Head person concord. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology. Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania, 21–23 September 2003, G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds), 221–234. Bologna: Universití degli Studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
2014 A Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Spencer, Andrew
2012 Possession and modification: A perspective from canonical typology. In Canonical Typology, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 207–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H.
1997 Genitives: A case study. Appendix to Theo M.V. Janssen, ‘Compositionality’. In Handbook of Logic and Linguistics, Johan van Benthem & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 464–470. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. & Borschev, Vladimir
1998 Integrating lexical and formal semantics: Genitives, relational nouns, and type-shifting. In Proceedings of the Second Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation, Robin Cooper & Thomas Gamkrelidze (eds), 229–241. Tbilisi: Center on Language, Logic, Speech, Tbilisi State University.Google Scholar
Salminen, Tapani
1997 Tundra Nenets Inflection. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob
1983 Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language [Language Universals Series, 2]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
2011 What’s in a compound. Review article of Lieber and Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Journal of Linguistics 47: 481–507.Google Scholar
2013 Lexical relatedness. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deidre
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
1994 The noun phrase. In Hungarian syntax [Syntax and Semantics 27], Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 179–274. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1996 Possessives in English. An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tereščenko, Natalʹja M.
1965 Nenecko-russkij slovarʹ (Nenets-Russian dictionary). Moscow: Sovetskaja ènciklopedija.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Starchenko, Aleksey
2019. Periphrastic Nominalization in Khanty. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.