Cover not available
Part of
Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries
Edited by Yoshiko Matsumoto, Bernard Comrie and Peter Sells
[Typological Studies in Language 116] 2017
► pp. 179–201

Chapter 8
Noun-modifying constructions and relativization in the central and western Caucasus

| University of California Berkeley
Languages of the Nakh-Daghestanian family in the central and eastern Caucasus uniformly use gap strategies for relativization and GNMCC’s, despite different contact histories. Languages to the west and southwest (West Caucasian, Kartvelian) are very different, using relative pronouns and finite verbs. Despite long contact there is almost no accommodation of eastern and western types to each other. This sharp typological divide is a continuation of a larger Eurasian divide between western languages, which use finite relativization with relative pronouns, and eastern ones, which use participles and gaps. The stability of the divide in the Caucasus and its evident antiquity there are testimony to the non-Sprachbund status of the Caucasus.
Keywords: Nakh-Daghestanian, West Caucasian, Kartvelian, relativization, finite
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Survey of relativization strategies and GNMCC’s
    • 2.1Nakh-Daghestanian
    • 2.2Ossetic (Digor dialect)
    • 2.3West Caucasian
    • 2.4Kartvelian
  • 3.Survey of other relevant typological variables
    • 3.1Constraints on relativization: Role and/or case of RN
    • 3.2Preferred case or role, based on text frequency counts
    • 3.3Core chaining
    • 3.4Relationship of relativization to core chaining
    • 3.5Agreement and how it works
    • 3.6Survey: Summary
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 28 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.116.09nic
References (29)
References
Alekseev, Mikhail E. & Ataev, Boris M. 1997. Avarskij jazyk. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Anthony, David W. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arkad’ev, Petr M., Lander, Jury A., Letuchij, Alexander B., Sumbatova, Nina R. & Testelets, Jakov G. 2009. Vvedenie. Osnovnye svedenija ob adygejskom jazyke. In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka, Petr M. Arkad’ev, Jury A. Lander, Alexander B. Letučij, Nina R. Sumbatova & Jakov G. Testelets (eds), 17–120. Moscow: Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj gumanitarnyj universitet.Google Scholar
Aronson, Howard I. 1991. Modern Georgian. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, 1: The Kartvelian Languages, Alice C. Harris (ed.), 219–312. Delmar NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911. Introduction. Handbook of American Indian Languages, Vol. I [Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40:1], 1–83. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav A. 2003. Abkhaz. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Kuteva, Tania. 2013. Relativization on Subjects. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (1 December 2013).
Creissels, Denis. 2014. P-lability and radical P alignment. Linguistics 52(4): 911–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael & Lander, Yury. 2013. Attributive predication in East Caucasian: Generalized noun modification or extended relativization? Presented atALT 10, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Dešeriev, Jury D. 1953. Batsbijskij jazyk: fonetika, morfologija, sintaksis, leksika. Moscow: Izdatel´stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1933. Textes avar. Journal Asiatique 222: 265–302.Google Scholar
Gerasimov, Dmitry V. & Lander, Jury A. 2008. Reljativizacija pod maskoj nominalizacii i faktivnyj argument v adygejskom jazyke. In Issledovanija po glagol’noj derivacii, Vladimir A. Plungjan & Sergei G. Tatevosov (eds), 290–313. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George & Khiba, Zaira K. 1979. Abkhaz. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann & Gagua, Rusudan. 1994. Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 4: North East Caucasian Languages, Part 2, Rieks Smeets (ed.), 147–212. Delmar NY: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalinina, Elena. 2011. Exclamative clauses in the languages of the North Caucasus. In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 161–202. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 1992. Relativization in polysynthetic languages. IJAL 58(2): 135–157.Google Scholar
2012. What’s in the head of head-marking languages? In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A Crosslinguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 164], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds), 211–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Jury A. 2012. Relativizacija v polisintetičeskom jazyke: Adygejskie otnositel’nye konstrukcii v tipologičeskoj perspektive. PhD dissertation, Oriental Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2011. Ingush Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. The Languages of the Great Caucasus Range. Cambridge: CUP.
Nichols, Johanna & Peterson, David A. 2010. Contact-induced spread of the rare Type 5 clitic. Presented at LSA Annual Meeting, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Öztürk, Balkız & Pöchtrager, Markus (eds). 2011. Pazar Laz. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2001. Ingush ’a: The elusive Type 5 clitic? Language 77: 144–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saidov, M. Dž. 1967. Avarsko-russkij slovar´. Moscow: Izdatel´stvo “Sovetskaja ènciklopedija”.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergej. G. 1996. Relative clauses. In Godoberi, Alexandr E. Kibrik (ed.), 210–217. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Thordarson, Fridrik. 1989. Ossetic. In Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), 456–479. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Tuite, Kevin. 1997. Svan. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1977. Aspects of Lakhota Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Maisak, Timur
2020. Relative clauses in Agul from a corpus-based perspective. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Lander, Yury & Michael Daniel
2019. West Caucasian relative pronouns as resumptives. Linguistics 57:6 ► pp. 1239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.