Cover not available
Part of
Egophoricity
Edited by Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe and Lila San Roque
[Typological Studies in Language 118] 2018
► pp. 173–196

Chapter 6
Egophoricity in Wutun

| University of Helsinki
This paper discusses the category of egophoricity in Wutun. Drawing from first-hand field material, I show how markers of egophoricity in Wutun interact with person. In the introductory section, I provide basic information on the Wutun language and on its areal context, typological profile and verb structure. I then introduce Wutun basic egophoric morphology and discuss manipulations of the basic system. It will be shown that pragmatic factors like volitionality, mirativity, the speaker’s degree of certainty concerning the truth value of the statement, and the speaker’s expectations of access to information by the addressee play significant roles in the interaction between egophoricity and person in Wutun. Finally, I discuss egophoricity in Wutun as an areal feature and suggest some possible diachronic sources for egophoricity markers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The Wutun language and the Amdo Sprachbund
    • 1.2Typological profile
    • 1.3Verb structure
  • 2.The egophoricity system
    • 2.1The basic system
    • 2.2The egophoricity system and reported evidentiality
  • 3.Manipulations of the basic system
    • 3.1Ego evidentiality and non-first persons
    • 3.2Sensory-inferential evidentiality and first person
    • 3.3Factual evidentiality in first person statements and question-answer sequences
  • 4.Egophoricity in Wutun from diachronic and areal perspective
  • 5.Summary and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.06san
References (39)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2): 1–11.Google Scholar
. 2008. Verb agreement and epistemic marking: A typological journey from the Himalayas to the Caucasus. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 1–14. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Chen, Naixiong. 1986. Guanyu Wutunhua (An outline of Wutun linguistic structure). Journal of Asian and African Studies 31: 33–52.Google Scholar
. 1988. Wutunhua Yinxi. Minzu Yuwen 3: 1–10.Google Scholar
. 1989. Wutunhua de Dongci Xingtai. Minzu Yuwen 6: 26–37.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2008. Remarks on so-called “conjunct/disjunct” systems. In Proceedings of Syntax of the World’s Languages III. Berlin, 25–28 September.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002. Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3): 611–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 203–213. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25: 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2): 379–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective. Proceedings from Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 93–120. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Fried, Robert Wayne. 2010. A Grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic Language of Northwest China. PhD dissertation, The University of Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Garrett, Edward J. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Georg, Stefan. 2003. Huzhu Mongghul. In The Mongolic Languages [Routledge Language Family Series 5], Juha Janhunen (ed.). 286-306London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct forms in Newari. In Papers in South-east Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A. No. 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 2005. The role of Turkic languages in the Amdo Sprachbund. In Turks and Non-Turks. Studies in the History of Linguistic and Cultural Contacts [Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia 10], Ewa Siemienic-Golaš & Marzanna Pomorska (eds), 113–122. Kraków: Institute of Oriental Philology, Jagiellonian University.Google Scholar
. 2007. Typological interaction in the Qinghai linguistic complex. Studia Orientalia 101: 85–102.Google Scholar
. 2012. On the hierarchy of structural convergence in the Amdo Sprachbund.In Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie and P. Solovyev (eds.) Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 177-189. Amsterdam: John Benjamin's.
Janhunen, Juha, Peltomaa, Marja, Sandman, Erika & Dongzhou, Xiawu. 2008. Wutun [Languages of the World/Materials 466]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lee-Smith, Mei W. & Wurm, Stephen A. 1996. The Wutun Language. In Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas [Trends in Linguistics. Documentation 13, Vol. II(2)], Stephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler & Darrell R. Tryon (eds), 883–897. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. 1983. Languages in contact in Western China. Papers in East Asian Languages 1: 31–51.Google Scholar
1984. From verb-medial analytic language to verb-final synthetic language: A case of typological change. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugman & Monica Macaulay (eds), 307–323. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1986. The rise and fall of tones through diffusion (1). In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Vassiliki Nikoforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Debora Feder, 307–323. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roos, Martina Erica 2000. The Western Yughur (Yellow Uygur) Language. Grammar, Texts, Vocabulary. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Sandman, Erika 2012. Bonan grammatical features in Wutun Mandarin. In Per Urales ad Orientem. Iter Polyphonicum Multilingue. Festskrift tillägnad Juha Janhunen på hans sextioårsdag den 12 februari 2012 [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 264], Tiina Hyytiäinen, Janne Saarikivi, Lotta Jalava & Erika Sandman (eds), 375–387. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
2016. A Grammar of Wutun. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila 2008. An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robyn. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16: 111–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slater, Keith 2003. A Grammar of Mangghuer. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.S. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63(4): 945–1001.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicholas 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/’disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Willis, Christina M. 2007. Evidentiality in Darma. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2): 89–124.Google Scholar
Xi, Yuanlin 1983. Tongren Tuzu Kaocha Baogao: Sizhaizi (Wutun) de Minzu Lishi, Yuyan he Yishu, Vol. 2: (Yuyan). Xining: Qinghai Minzu Xueyuan Minzu Yanjiusuo Tongren Tuzu Kaocha Zu.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sandman, Erika & Karolina Grzech
2022. Egophoricity and evidentiality: Different categories, similar discourse functions. Interactional Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Floyd, Simeon
2020. Subject and Topic. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2020. Grammaticalized sources of Kurtöp verbal morphology. Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.