Simeon Floyd | Universidad San Francisco de Quito | Max Planck Institute for Psycolinguistics
The Cha’palaa language of Ecuador (Barbacoan) features verbal morphology for marking knowledge-based categories that, in usage, show a variant of the cross-linguistically recurrent pattern of ‘egophoric distribution': specific forms associate with speakers in contrast to others in statements and with addressees in contrast to others in questions. These are not person markers, but rather are used by speakers to portray their involvement in states of affairs as active, agentive participants (ego) versus other types of involvement (non-ego). They interact with person and argument structure, but through pragmatic ‘person sensitivities’ rather than through grammatical agreement. Not only does this pattern appear in verbal morphology, it also can be observed in alternations of predicate construction types and case alignment, helping to show how egophoric marking is a pervasive element of Cha'palaa's linguistic system. This chapter gives a first account of egophoricity in Cha’palaa, beginning with a discussion of person sensitivity, egophoric distribution, and issues of flexibility of marking with respect to degree of volition or control. It then focuses on a set of intransitive experiencer (or ‘endopathic') predicates that refer to internal states which mark egophoric values for the undergoer role, not the actor role, showing ‘quirky’ accusative marking instead of nominative case. It concludes with a summary of how egophoricity in Cha'palaa interacts with issues of argument structure in comparison to a language with person agreement, here represented by examples from Cha’palaa’s neighbor Ecuadorian Highland Quechua.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.The Cha’palaa language
2.1Basic clause types
2.2The Cha’palaa finite clause in natural speech
3.Person sensitivity and egophoric distribution
3.1Person sensitivity
3.2Egophoric distribution as a type of person sensitivity
4.Basic egophoric morphology in Cha’palaa
4.1Basic egophoric distributional patterns
4.2Egophoricity in reported speech
4.3Egophoric marking and plurality
5.Issues of (in)flexibility in egophoric marking
5.1Non-volitional actions
5.2Egophoricity and dubitativity
5.3Egophoricity in speaker questions
5.4Egophoricity and evidentiality
6.Egophoricity in experiencer constructions
6.1Emotion constructions
6.2Desiderative constructions
6.3Volitional vs. non-volitional predicates
7.Conclusion
7.1Argument structure with egophoricity versus person agreement
2011The ‘heart’ of things: A conceptual metaphoric analysis of heart and related body parts in Thai, Japanese and English. Intercultural Communication Studies 20(1): 65–78.
Bickel, Balthasar
2000Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2): 1–11.
Bickel, Balthasar
2008Verb agreement and epistemic marking: A typological journey from the Himalayas to the Caucasus. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 1–14. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Chafe, Wallace
(1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (Eds.), 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Criessels, Denis
2008Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: Functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(4): 309–325.
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cole, Peter
1982Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
1997A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An Indigenous Language of South-western Colombia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2000Why “first/non-first person”is not grammaticalized mirativity. In Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan & John Henderson (eds). [URL]
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2002Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3): 611–627.
DeLancey, Scott
1992The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25: 39–62.
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
DeLancey, Scott
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382.
2002Complex Predicates in Tsafiki. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon at Eugene.
Evans, Nicholas
1996Grammaticizing the knower: Towards a partial typology of person effects on predicates. Plenary, Third Australian Linguistics Institute, ANU.
Evans, Nicholas
2007View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective. Proceedings of the Annual Berkeley Linguistics Society Meeting 31(1): 93–120.
Faller, Martina T.
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cusco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Floyd, Simeon & Bruil, Martine
2011Interactional functions as part of the grammar: The suffix –ba in Cha’palaa. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Language Description and Theory, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Lutz Marten & David Nathan (eds), 91–100. London: SOAS.
Floyd, Simeon
2014aFour types of reduplication in the Cha'palaa language of Ecuador. In Reduplication in South American Indian Languages, Hein van der Voort & Gale Goodwin Gómez (eds), 77–113. Leiden: Brill.
Floyd, Simeon
2014bThe ‘deceased-referent’ marker in Nheengatú, a first look at a lesser-known type of social status marking. Paper presented at Amazónicas V, Belém, Brazil, May26–30.
Garrett, Edward John
2001Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
Garrett, Edward & Bateman, Leah
2007Symbiosis between documentary linguistics and linguistic pragmatics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory, Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond & David Nathan (eds). London: SOAS.
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hargreaves, David
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 4: 1–48.
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A, 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1):119–132
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687.
Heritage, John
2012aEpistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45:1–29.
Heritage, John
2012bThe epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 30–52.
Heritage, John
2013Epistemics in Conversation. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hermon, Gabriella
2001Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quichua. In Aikhenvald, Dixon & Onishi (eds), 149–176.
Hill, Nathan
2012‘Mirativity’ does not exist: ḥdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 389–433.
Kamio, Akio
1994The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 67–100
Kamio, Akio
1995Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 235–264.
2003Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lazard, Gilbert
1999Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?Linguistic Typology 3(1): 91–109.
Labov, William & Fanshel, David
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic Press.
Lehmann, Christian
2011Speech-act participants in modality. Paper presented at the International Conference on Discourse and Grammar, Universiteit Gent 23–25October 2008 <[URL]
Loughnane, Robin
2009A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Niemeier, Susanne
2000Straight from the heart – metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Antonio Barcelona (ed.), 195–213 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Malchukov, Adrej
2010“Quirky case”: Rare phenomena in case-marking and their implications for a theory of typological distributions. In Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory, Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds).139–169. Berlin: Mouton.
1996Comparaison des systèmes médiatifs de quatre dialectes Tibétains. In L’énonciation médiatisée, Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), 195–213. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.
Tournadre, Nicolas, & Sangda Dorje
(2003) Manual of standard Tibetan: language and civilization: introduction to standad Tibetan (spoken and written) followed by an appendix on classical literary Tibetan. Ithaca, N.Y: Snow Lion Publications.
Tournadre, Nicholas
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.