Chapter published in:
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 29–56

The essive in Finnish

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of a marker referred to as the ‘essive’ in Finnish. The description of the properties of this marker follows the linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and/or translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the marker in the essive sense (associated with state) is contrasted with its use in expressing the translative sense (associated with change). Finally, the syntactic position of elements marked by this form is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents.
Keywords: Finnish, depictive, essive case, impermanent state, non-verbal predication, individual-level predicate, stage-level predicate, focus
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.02hyn
References

References

Creissels, Denis
2008 Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014 Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38 (3), 605–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli & Karlsson, Fred
1979 Nykysuomen lauseoppia (Modern Finnish syntax). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja Riitta & Alho, Irja
2004 Iso suomen kielioppi (A descriptive grammar of Finnish). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 From Space to Time. Temporal Adverbials in World’s Languages [Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 3]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2009 Terminology of case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992 Non-verbal Predication. Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. 2005 Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts. An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva F. Schultze-Berndt (eds),1–67. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas & Ojutkangas, Krista
2006 An introduction to Finnish spatial relations: Local cases and adpositions. In Grammar from the Human Perspective. Case, Space and Person in Finnish [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 277], Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds), 11–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hynönen, Emmi
2013 Essiivisijaisten lekseemien leksikaalistumisjatkumo (Lexicalization continuum of essive-case state-denoting lexemes). Virittäjä 117: 551–579.Google Scholar
2016 Suomen essiivi (Finnish essive). Annales Universitatis Turkuensis C 425. Turku: University of Turku. http://​www​.doria​.fi​/handle​/10024​/124790Google Scholar
Itkonen, Erkki
1966: Kieli ja sen tutkimus (Language and its research). Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred
1999 Finnish. An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1980: Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Larjavaara, Matti
1995 Savon (n)nA-supiini ((n)nA-supine in Savonian dialects of Finnish). In Murteiden matkassa. Juhlakirja Alpo Räisäsen 60-vuotispäiväksi, Marjatta Palander (ed.), 132–141. Joensuu: Faculty of Humanities of the University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Leinonen, Marja
2008: Depictive secondary predicates in Finnish. In Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds), 167–188. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag. http://​d​-nb​.info​/995792097​/34/
Manninen, Satu
2003 Small Phrase Layers: A study of Finnish Manner Adverbials [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mielikäinen, Aila
1978: Aktiivin II partisiippi Etelä-Savon murteissa (The past active participle in South Savo dialects). Virittäjä 82: 101–121.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1978 Secondary predicates. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 18–20, 114–127. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1981 Predicate Nominals. A Partial Surface Syntax of Russian. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nose, Masahiko
2007 Word order positions of the Finno-Ugric essive case forms. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 2007(2): 103–114.Google Scholar
Nykysuomen sanakirja
(Dictionary of Modern Finnish) 1951–1996 13th edn. Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar
Onikki-Rantajääskö, Tiina
2001 Sarjoja. Nykysuomen paikallissijaiset olotilanilmaukset kielen analogisuuden ilmentäjinä (Patterns and analogy. A case study of state-denoting local case constructions in modern Finnish). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2006 Metonymy in locatives of state. In Grammar from the Human Perspective. Case, Space and Person in Finnish [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 277], Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds), 67–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pajunen, Anneli
2000 Suomen ominaisuuspredikaatio ja tyyppi olla sairaana . Näkökulmia kielitypologiaan, Anneli Pajunen (ed.), 36–87. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2001 Argumenttirakenne. Asiaintilojen luokitus ja verbien käyttäytyminen suomen kielessä (Argument structure. A taxonomy of states of affairs and the syntactic behaviour of verbs in Finnish). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Pustet, Regina
2003 Copulas. Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salminen, Taru 2000 Morfologiasta moniäänisyyteen: Suomen kielen kvasirakenteen merkitys, käyttö ja kehitys (From morphology to polyphony. Meaning, function and evolution of the quasi-construction in Finnish). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2002 Retention of abstract meaning. The essive case and grammaticalization of polyphony in Finnish. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 293–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Särkkä, Tauno
1969 Itämerensuomalaisten kielten eksessiivi (The exessive case of the Baltic-Finnic languages). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004: Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 8: 59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Setälä, Eemil Nestor
1891 Suomen kielen lauseoppi (Finnish syntax), 3rd rev. edn. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon
1997 Intransitive Predication. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 Non-verbal predication in Circum-Baltic languages. In Circum-Baltic Languages, Vol.1 [Studies in Language Companion Series 54], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 569–590. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sulkala, Helena & Karjalainen, Merja
1992: Finnish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ylikoski, Jussi
2003 Havaintoja suomen ns. viidennen infinitiivin käytöstä (English summary: Remarks on the use of the proximative verb form (the so-called 5th infinitive) in Finnish. Sananjalka 45: 7–44.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kagan, Olga
2020.  In The Semantics of Case, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.