Chapter published in:
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 325–351

The essives in Hungarian

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of the three essive markers in Hungarian on the basis of a linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the essives (associated with state) is contrasted with the use of the translative (associated with change). Finally, the syntactic position of elements marked by an essive is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents.
Keywords: Hungarian, depictive, essive case, impermanent state, non-verbal predication, focus
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.14deg
References

Sources

References

Baayen, R. Harald
1992 On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
de Groot, Casper
2008 Depictive secondary predication in Hungarian. In Schroeder et al. (eds), 69–96.Google Scholar
2009 Identifiability and verbal cross-referencing markers in Hungarian. In Interpersonal Grammar: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, Evelien Keizer & Miriam van Staden (eds). Linguistics 47(4): 997–1019.Google Scholar
2012 Oriented adjuncts and representational frames: Depictives and manner in Hungarian. In Between East and West. Festschrift for Wim Honselaar [POES 20], René Genis, Eric de Haard, Janneke Kalsbeek, Evelien Keizer & Jenny Stelleman (eds), 217–239. Amsterdam: Pegasus.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002 The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fenyvesi, Anna
(ed.) 2005 Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 20]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gyurgyík, László & Sebők, László
2003 Népszámlálási körkép Közép-Európából 1989–2002 (An overview of Central European censuses, 1989–2002). Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva F.
2005 Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva F. Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert M. & Fenyvesi, Anna
1998 Hungarian. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
(ed.) 2000 Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, 3. Kötet: Morfológia (A structural grammar of Hungarian, Part 3: Morphology). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kiss, Jenő & Pusztai, Ferenc
2005 Magyar nyelvtörténet (A history of the Hungarian language). Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2013 The family of secondary predications in English: An FDG view. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 67: 43–58.Google Scholar
Nose, Masahiko
2003 Word order positions of the Finno-Ugric essive case forms. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 2: 103–114. Google Scholar
Oravecz, Csaba, Váradi, Tamás & Sass, Bálint
2014 The Hungarian gigaword corpus. In Proceedings of LREC 2014, 1719–1723.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 Depictive secondary predicates. Linguistic Typology 8(1): 59–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tompa, Jozsef
(1968), Ungarische Grammatik. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó. CrossrefGoogle Scholar