Cover not available
Part of
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 479–495

Chapter 20
The essive-translative in Selkup and Kamas

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of a marker referred to as the ‘essive-translative’ in Selkup. The description of the properties of this marker follows the linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and/or translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. Kamas does not have such marker.
Keywords: Selkup, Kamas, depictive, essive case, impermanent state, non-verbal predication, focus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1General information
    • 1.2Data and sources
    • 1.3The case systems
      • 1.3.1Selkup
      • 1.3.2Kamas
  • 2.Non-verbal predicates – copular constructions
    • 2.1Selkup
    • 2.2Kamas
  • 3.Secondary predicates/predication
  • 4.Predicative complements
  • 5.Adverbials
  • 6.Comparative and simile expressions
  • 7.Essive versus translative
  • 8.Word order and focus
  • 9.The origin of essive-translative in Selkup
  • 10.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.20wag
References (37)
References
Bajdak, Alexandra V., Maksimova, N. P. & Krasikova, N. L. 2009. Seľkupskyj tekst (Selkup text). In Sbornik annotyrovannyh fol’klornyh tekstov jazykov obsko-enisejskogo jazykovogo areala, Andrey Filchenko (ed.), 45–90. Tomsk: Veter.Google Scholar
Bajdak, Alexandra V., Maksimova, N. P. & Fedotova, N. L. 2010. Seľkupskye teksty (Selkup texts). In Annotated Folklore Prose Text of Ob-Yenissey Language Area, Andrey Filchenko (ed.), 133–184. Tomsk: Veter.Google Scholar
Bajdak, Aleksandra V. & Maksimova, N. P. 2012. Seľkupskij tekst (Selkup text). In Sbornik annotirovannyh foľklornyh i bytovyh tekstov obsko-enisejskogo jazykovogo areala (Annotated folk and daily prose texzs in the languages of Ob-Yenissei linguistic area), Andrey Filchenko (ed.), 72–100. Tomsk: Tomsk state Pedagogical University.Google Scholar
Bekker, E. G., Alitkina, L. A., Bykonja, V. V. & Iľjashenko, I. A. 1995. Morfologija seľkupskogo jazyka. Juzhnye dialekty. Chasť 1 (Morphology of Selkup language. Southern dialects, Vol.1). Tomsk: NTL.Google Scholar
Bykonya, V. V. (ed.) 2005: Sel’kupsko-russkij dialektnyj slovar’. [Selkup-Russian Dialect Dictionary]. Tomsk: Tomsk Gos. Ped. Univesitet.Google Scholar
Bykonja, V. V., Kim, A. A., Kuper, S. C., Maksimova, N. P. & Ilyashenko, A. I. 1996. Skazki narymskih seľkupov (Tales of Narym Selkups). Tomsk: NTL.Google Scholar
Castrén, Matthias Alexander. 1854. Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. Herausgegeben von Anton Schiefner. St. Petersburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Dulson, Andreas P. 1966. Ketskie skazki (Ket tales). Tomsk: Izd. Tomskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Hajdú, Péter. 1973. Das sölkupische Translativsuffix -wlä. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 40: 20–28.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen. 1982. Drevnejshie vengersko-samodijskie jazykovye paralleli (Ancient linguistic parallels between Hungarian and Samoyed). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugene. 1983. The Language of the First Selkup Books [Studia Uralo-Altaica 22]. Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen. 1998. Selkup. In The Uralic Languages, Daniel Abondolo (ed.), 480–515. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Janurik, Tamás. 1978. A szölkup nyelvjárások osztályozásához (Towards the classification of Selkup dialects). Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 80: 77–104.Google Scholar
Joki, Aulis J. 1944. Kai Donners Kamassisches Wörterbuch nebst Sprachproben und Hauptzügen der Grammatik [Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae VIII]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Katz, Hartmut. 1979. Bemerkungen zum selkupischen Translative-Suffix “-wlä”. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 81: 373–379.Google Scholar
Kazekevich, Olga. 2010. Sel’kupskij jazyk (severnoe narečie, srednetazovskij govor): grammatičeskij očerk (The Selkup language: The Taz dialect of Northern Selkup). In Dialektologičeskij slovar’ sel’kupskogo jazyka (A dialectological dictionary of the Selkup language), Olga Kazakevich & E. M. Budnyanskaya (eds), 270–368. Ekaterinburg: Basko.Google Scholar
Kuzmina, Angelina 1967. Dialektologicheskie materialy po sel'kupskomu jazyku. [Dialectal meterials of Selkup languege.]. Issledovanija po jazyku i fol'klory Vol 2: 267–329.Google Scholar
1968: Bezlichnoe sklonenie imen sushestvitel'nyh v sel'kupskom jazyke [Non-possessive declination in Selkup langueg]. Voprosy jazyka i literatiry Vol 2: 256–277.Google Scholar
Kazakevich, Olga & Budnyanskaya, E. M. 2010. Dialektologičeskij slovar’ sel’kupskogo jazyka (A dialectological dictionary of the Selkup language). Ekaterinburg: Basko.Google Scholar
Kuznecova, Ariadna, Helimskij, Evgenij & Gruškina, E. V. 1980: Očerki po seľkuskomu jazyku. (Sketches of the Selkup language). Moskva: Izdateľstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kuznecova, Ariadna, Kazakevich, Olga, Joffe, L. Ju. & Helimskij, Evgenij. 1993. Očerki po seľkuskomu jazyku. Tazovskij dialekt (Sketches of the Selkup language: The Taz dialect). Москва: Izdateľstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kuznecova, N. G. 1995. Grammaticheskie kategorii juzhnoseľkupskogo glagola (Gramatical classes of verbs in Southern Selkup). Tomsk: Izd. Tomskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Künnap, Ago. 1971. System und Ursprung der kamassischen Flexionssuffixe I [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 147]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
. 1976a. Kamassilaisia tekstejä I. Fenno-ugristica 2: 116–135.Google Scholar
. 1976b. Kamassilaisia tekstejä II. Fenno-ugristica 3: 128–136.Google Scholar
. 1980. Über die Herkunft der Infinitivsuffixe im Samojedischen. Sovetskoe Finno-ugrovedenie 16: 286–293.Google Scholar
. 1986. Kamassilaisia tekstejä III. Fenno-ugristica 13: 166–173.Google Scholar
. 1990. Kamassilaisia tekstejä IV. Fenno-ugristica 17: 128–237.Google Scholar
. 1992a. Kamassilaisia arvoituksia. Fenno-ugristica 17: 123–127.Google Scholar
. 1992b. Kamassilaisia tekstejä V. Fenno-ugristica 18: 128–140.Google Scholar
Labádi, Gizella 1971. A PU *-k lativusrag fejleményei a déli szamojédban. [The developments of the pu lahve suffix -k in South Samoyedic] Néprajz és Nyelvtudomány 15/16: 51–56.Google Scholar
Lehtisalo, Toivo. 1960. Ostjaksamojedisches Sprachmaterial vom Turuchan Fluss. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 122: 317–338.Google Scholar
Prokofjev, G. N. 1935. Sel’kupskaja grammatika (The grammar of Selkup). Moscow: Izdat. Inst. Narodov Severa CIK SSRGoogle Scholar
Szabó, László. 1967. Selkup Texts with Phonetic Introduction and Vocabulary [Uralic an Altaic Series Volume 75]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tereshchenko, Natalja Mitrofanovna. 1973. Sintaksis samodijskih jazykov (Syntax of Samoyedic languages). Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tuchkova, Nataľja & Helimskij, Evgenij. 2010. O materialah A. I. Kuzminoj po seľkupskomu jazyku (On the Selkup material of A.I. Kuzmina). Hamburg: Institut für Finnougristik/UralistikGoogle Scholar
Valijärvi, Riitta-Liisa. 2008. Converbs in Northern Selkup. In Subordination and Coordination Strategies in North Asian Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 300], Edward Vajda (ed.), 167–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar