Part of
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 429
References

References

Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter
1997Causatives and applicatives in Australian Aboriginal languages. In The Dative and Related Phenomena, Kazuto Matsumura & Toru Hayashi (eds), 165–225.Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Blutner, Reinhard, de Hoop, Helen & Hendriks, Petra
2006Optimal Communication. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna
2010Ainu applicatives in typological perspective. Studies in Language 34(4): 749–801. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra
1983An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. In Studies in Relational Grammar 1, David M. Perlmutter (ed.), 219–271. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 1975: 1–32.Google Scholar
1976The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Syntax and Semantics, 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2003Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael, Haspelmath, Martin & Malchukov, Andrej
(eds) 2010Semantic maps: Theory and applications. Linguistic Discovery 8(1).Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2000A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
1997A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark
1999A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1986Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62: 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada Fernández, Zarina, Tubino, Mercedes & Villalpando, Jesús
2015Valency classes in Yaqui. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1359–1391. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D.
1984West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Geniušiene, Emma
1987The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B.
1988Object and Absolutive in Halkomelem Salish. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
1993Mapping Halkomelem grammatical relations. Linguistics 31: 591–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Kiyosawa, Kaoru
2005Halkomelem psych applicatives. Studies in Language 29(2): 329–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna
2010Ditransitive constructions in Halkomelem Salish: A direct object/oblique object language. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 563–611. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Golluscio, Lucia
2010Ditransitives in Mapudungun. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 710–757. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, Tubino Blanco, Mercedes & Haugen, Jason
2009Applicative constructions and suppletive verbs in Yaqui. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 42–51.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14: 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–43. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, and Thomas Müller-Bardey
2004Valency change. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2, 1130–1145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2005Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1):1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I.
1994On the lexical distribution of agent-preserving and object-preserving transitivity alternations. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17: 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2009Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43(1): 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, Mimi H.
1991Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015Valency classes in Yucatec Maya. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1407–1461. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander
2006Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges to Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps & Alexander Arkhipov (eds), 247–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M.
2005Argument realization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
1993The Syntax and Semantics of Adversative Constructions in Even. Gengo Kenkyu, vol. 103.Google Scholar
2009Incompatible categories: resolving the “present perfective paradox”. In Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop and Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality, 13–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Analyzing semantic maps: A multifactorial approach. In Semantic Maps: Theory and Applications, Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov (eds). Linguistic Discovery 8(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath and Bernard Comrie
2010Ditransitive construction: a typological overview. In Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: a comparative handbook, 1–64. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2011Interaction of verbal categories: Resolution of infelicitous grammeme combinations. Linguistics 49(1): 229–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 73–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K.
2007Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 15(3): 393–451.Google Scholar
Marlett, Stephen
forthcoming. A Grammar of Seri. [URL]
Mel’čuk, Igor
2006Aspects of the Theory of Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito
2015Valency classes in Central Alaskan Yupik. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1145–1184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2000Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 84–114. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike
2010Ditransitive constructions and their alternations in Teop. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 486–509. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2015Valency classes in Xârâcùù (New Caledonia). In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1015–1069. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1964O svjazi kauzativnosti i passivnosti. In Voprosy obščego i romano-germanskogo jazykoznanija, J. M. Skrebnev (ed.), 301–310. Ufa: Baškirskoe knižnoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sil’nitskij, Georgij G.
1969Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. In Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. Morfologicheskij kauzativ, Alexandr A. Xolodovic (ed.), 5–19. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
(ed.) 2007Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 5 Vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. and Sergej Je. Jaxontov
1988The Typology of Resultative Constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), The Typology of Resultative Constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David
2007Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2011Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 108. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL]
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul
1993–2004Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
(ed.) 1976aSyntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions . 1–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Passives and related constructions. Language 61(4): 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant
2002The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Artawa, Ketut
2015Valency classes in Balinese. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 857–920. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil
1996Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1996Causatives and Causation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1988Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (Ed.), Passive and Voice, 95–649. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xolodovich, Alexander A.
(ed.) 1969Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukciy; Morfologicheskij kauzativ. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor S.
1974Passivnye konstrukcii (Passive constructions). In Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcij, Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 5–45. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
1996Grammatičeskie kategorii glagola: Opyt teorii vzaimodejstvija (Grammatical categories of the verb: Towards a theory of category interaction). In Mežkategorial’nye svjazi v grammatike, Vladimir A. Bondarko (ed.), 22–43. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir A. Plungian
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2/1, 125–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Honoré
2015Valency classes in Sliammon Salish. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1293–1338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
2006Towards a structural typology of verb classes. In Advances in the Theory of the Lexicon, Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), 57–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Roberto
2002Inversion and Other Topics in the Grammar of Olutec (Mixean). PhD dissertation, Ann Arbor, UMI.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2015Valency classes in Mapudungun. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1495–1525. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2010Semantic Map Geometry: Two Approaches. In Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath and Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Semantic maps: theory and applications. Linguistic Discovery, 8: 1.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Janic, Katarzyna
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
2017. The antipassive marking in Mocoví. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120],  pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
Sansò, Andrea
2018. Explaining the diversity of antipassives: Formal grammar vs. (diachronic) typology. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.