Cover not available
Part of
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 4–29

Markedness effects in applicative formation

| Institute of Linguistics, St.-Petersburg | Russian Academy of Sciences | University of Mainz
The article discusses different types of applicative polysemy, focusing on cases of voice ambivalence, that is cases when the same valency marker performs different functions, depending on the semantic and syntactic properties of the verb stem to which it applies (in particular whether the verb is intransitive, transitive or ditransitive). The attested patterns of polysemy (applicative-causative, applicative-antipassive, as well as polysemies involving different kinds of applicatives) are explained in terms of the shared syntactic components. These selective similarities between individual voice markers can be captured by a semantic map, as manifestation of local markedness in the domain of voice categories.
Article outline
  • 1.Voice ambivalence: Preliminary illustrations
  • 2.Causative-applicative polysemy
  • 3.Applicative-antipassive polysemy
  • 4.Applicative reversal
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.120.01mal
References (75)
References
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1997. Causatives and applicatives in Australian Aboriginal languages. In The Dative and Related Phenomena, Kazuto Matsumura & Toru Hayashi (eds), 165–225.Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Blutner, Reinhard, de Hoop, Helen & Hendriks, Petra. 2006. Optimal Communication. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna. 2010. Ainu applicatives in typological perspective. Studies in Language 34(4): 749–801. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1983. An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesia. In Studies in Relational Grammar 1, David M. Perlmutter (ed.), 219–271. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1975. Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 1975: 1–32.Google Scholar
. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Syntax and Semantics, 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael, Haspelmath, Martin & Malchukov, Andrej (eds). 2010. Semantic maps: Theory and applications. Linguistic Discovery 8(1).Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 1997. A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 1999. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62: 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada Fernández, Zarina, Tubino, Mercedes & Villalpando, Jesús. 2015. Valency classes in Yaqui. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1359–1391. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Geniušiene, Emma. 1987. The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. 1988. Object and Absolutive in Halkomelem Salish. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
1993. Mapping Halkomelem grammatical relations. Linguistics 31: 591–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Kiyosawa, Kaoru. 2005. Halkomelem psych applicatives. Studies in Language 29(2): 329–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Halkomelem Salish: A direct object/oblique object language. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 563–611. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Golluscio, Lucia. 2010. Ditransitives in Mapudungun. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 710–757. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, Tubino Blanco, Mercedes & Haugen, Jason. 2009. Applicative constructions and suppletive verbs in Yaqui. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 42–51.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14: 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–43. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, and Thomas Müller-Bardey. 2004. Valency change. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, and J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2, 1130–1145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1):1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I. 1994. On the lexical distribution of agent-preserving and object-preserving transitivity alternations. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17: 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2009. Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43(1): 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, Mimi H. 1991. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015. Valency classes in Yucatec Maya. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1407–1461. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander. 2006. Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges to Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps & Alexander Arkhipov (eds), 247–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. 2005. Argument realization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 1993. The Syntax and Semantics of Adversative Constructions in Even. Gengo Kenkyu, vol. 103.Google Scholar
. 2009. Incompatible categories: resolving the “present perfective paradox”. In Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop and Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Modality, 13–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Analyzing semantic maps: A multifactorial approach. In Semantic Maps: Theory and Applications, Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov (eds). Linguistic Discovery 8(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath and Bernard Comrie. 2010. Ditransitive construction: a typological overview. In Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath, and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions: a comparative handbook, 1–64. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2011. Interaction of verbal categories: Resolution of infelicitous grammeme combinations. Linguistics 49(1): 229–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 73–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K. 2007. Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 15(3): 393–451.Google Scholar
Marlett, Stephen. forthcoming. A Grammar of Seri. <[URL]>
Mel’čuk, Igor. 2006. Aspects of the Theory of Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito. 2015. Valency classes in Central Alaskan Yupik. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1145–1184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 84–114. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 2010. Ditransitive constructions and their alternations in Teop. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 486–509. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 2015. Valency classes in Xârâcùù (New Caledonia). In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1015–1069. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1964. O svjazi kauzativnosti i passivnosti. In Voprosy obščego i romano-germanskogo jazykoznanija, J. M. Skrebnev (ed.), 301–310. Ufa: Baškirskoe knižnoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sil’nitskij, Georgij G. 1969. Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. In Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij. Morfologicheskij kauzativ, Alexandr A. Xolodovic (ed.), 5–19. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.). 2007. Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], 5 Vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. and Sergej Je. Jaxontov. 1988. The Typology of Resultative Constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), The Typology of Resultative Constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2011. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 108. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. <[URL]>
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993–2004. Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.). 1976a. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions: a conspectus. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 6: The grammar of causative constructions . 1–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Passives and related constructions. Language 61(4): 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant. 2002. The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Artawa, Ketut. 2015. Valency classes in Balinese. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 857–920. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and Causation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1988. Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (Ed.), Passive and Voice, 95–649. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xolodovich, Alexander A. (ed.) 1969. Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukciy; Morfologicheskij kauzativ. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. 1974. Passivnye konstrukcii (Passive constructions). In Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcij, Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 5–45. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
1996. Grammatičeskie kategorii glagola: Opyt teorii vzaimodejstvija (Grammatical categories of the verb: Towards a theory of category interaction). In Mežkategorial’nye svjazi v grammatike, Vladimir A. Bondarko (ed.), 22–43. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2/1, 125–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Honoré. 2015. Valency classes in Sliammon Salish. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1293–1338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2006. Towards a structural typology of verb classes. In Advances in the Theory of the Lexicon, Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), 57–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala, Roberto. 2002. Inversion and Other Topics in the Grammar of Olutec (Mixean). PhD dissertation, Ann Arbor, UMI.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2015. Valency classes in Mapudungun. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1495–1525. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 2010. Semantic Map Geometry: Two Approaches. In Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath and Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Semantic maps: theory and applications. Linguistic Discovery, 8: 1.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Chapter 8. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Payne, Doris L.
2021. Chapter 14. The profile and development of the Maa (Eastern Nilotic) antipassive. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Sansò, Andrea
2018. Explaining the diversity of antipassives: Formal grammar vs. (diachronic) typology. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:6 DOI logo
Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
2017. The antipassive marking in Mocoví. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
2021. Chapter 10. Explaining the antipassive-causative syncretism in Mocoví (Guaycuruan). In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.