Cover not available
Part of
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 31–49

Morphosyntactic defectiveness in complex predicate formation

 | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
This article focuses on verb valency change in complex predicate formation by noun incorporation. I reassess the claim that incorporated nouns and clitics in both Uto-Aztecan and Romance languages are morphosyntactically defective, and I show that crucially morphosyntactic defectiveness, but not semantic prototypicality is a necessary condition in many natural languages in order to identify formally those nominal expressions that are to be interpreted as property-denoting expressions and event predicate modifiers, rather than as canonical syntactic and semantic arguments.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1 Mithun’s (1984) types of NI
    • 2.2Conceptual approach to NI (Borthen 2003; Carlson 2010)
    • 2.3Towards a morphosyntactic approach to NI
  • 3.Morphosyntactic defectiveness in NI
    • 3.1NI in Uto-Aztecan (Jelinek 1998; Haugen 2007, 2008)
    • 3.2NI in Romance (Dobrovie-Sorin et al. 2006; Espinal 2010; Espinal & McNally 2007a, 2007b, 2011)
    • 3.3Clitic incorporation in Mexican Spanish (Navarro 2009; Navarro & Espinal 2012)
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.120.02esp
References (49)
References
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2001. The Atoms of Language. New York NY: The Basic Books.Google Scholar
Beavers, John 2011. On affectedness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borik, Olga & Gehrke, Berit. 2015. An introduction to the syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. Syntax and Semantics 40: 1–43.Google Scholar
Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Norwegian Bare Singulars. PhD dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg. 2010. Generics and concepts. In Kinds, Things and Stuff, Francis Jeffrey Pelletier (ed.), 16–35. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. 2004. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at Large. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Espinal, M.Teresa. 2015. Bare nominals in Brazilian Portuguese: More on the DP/NP analysis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33: 471–521. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2003. A semantics for pseudo incorporation. Ms, Rutgers University. < [URL]>.
. 2011. Hindi pseudo incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 123–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Incorporation: Morphosyntactic vs. semantic considerations. Syntax and Semantics 40: 47–87.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Bleam Tonia & Espinal, M.Teresa. 2006. Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation. In Non-Definiteness and Plurality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], Liliane Tasmowski & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds), 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53(4): 810–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.Teresa. 2010. Bare nominals in Catalan and Spanish. Their structure and meaning. Lingua 120(4): 984–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Bare nominals, bare predicates: Properties and related types. In New Perspectives on Bare Noun Phrases in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series 141], Johannes Kabatek & Albert Wall (eds), 63–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.Teresa & Mateu, Jaume. 2011. Bare nominals and argument structure in Catalan and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 28: 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M.Teresa & McNally, Louise. 2007a. Bare singular nominals and incorporating verbs. In Proceedings of the III NEREUS International Workshop. Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero–Romance Languages [Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaft 122], Georg Kaiser & Manuel Leonetti (eds), 45–62. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
. 2007b. Bare singulars: Variation at the syntax-semantics interface. Paper presented at the Workshop on Bare nouns and Nominalizations. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart.
. 2011. Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics 47: 87–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka & de Swart, Henriëtte. 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 21], Bernard Comrie & María Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2007. Denominal verbs and noun incorporation. Uto-Aztecan evidence for a unified syntactic account. Texas Linguistics Society 9: 145–165.Google Scholar
2008. Morphology at the Interfaces. Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1998. Voice and transitivity as functional projections in Yaqui. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 195–224. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac S., Vladimir P. Nedjalkov & Polinskaja, Maria S. 1988. Antipassive in Chukchee: Oblique object, object incorporation, zero object. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2011. Verb classes within and across languages. Paper presented at the Valency Classes Conference. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2012. Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 252–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNally, Louise & Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1997. Redefining the weak/strong distinction. Paper presented at the 1997 Colloque de Syntaxe et Sémantique àParis.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4): 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munn, Alan & Schmitt, Cristina. 2005. Number and indefinites. Lingua 115: 821–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Ía. 2009. Predicados complejos con le en Español Mexicano. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra.Google Scholar
Navarro, Ía & Espinal, M.Teresa. 2012. Le-predicates and event modification in Mexican Spanish. Lingua 122: 409–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. A Study of Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara Thomas. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: A lexical analysis. Language 65: 294–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 56: 300–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Some notes on noun incorporation. Language 62: 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina. 1996. Aspect and the Syntax of Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina & Munn, Alan. 1999. Against the nominal mapping parameter: Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of NELS, Pius Ngwa Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds), 339–353. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1995. Incorporation in Chukchi. Language 71(3): 439–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Karl. 1972. Appropriateness conditions for nominal compounds. Working Papers on Language Universals 8: 3–20.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mateu, Jaume
2017. Two types of locative alternation. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Navarro, Ia
2017. The semantics of Nahuatl tla- constructions. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.