Part of
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 5277
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2010Argument Structure and the Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Case Study in Latin and Other Languages. Universitat de Barcelona. PhD dissertation. [URL]
Acedo Matellán, Víctor
2013Merging roots in bare phrase structure and the conflation/incorporation distinction. NELS 42: 1–14.Google Scholar
Acedo Matellán, Víctor & Mateu, Jaume
2015Parameters and argument structure, I: Motion predicates and resultatives. In Contemporary Linguistic Parameters, Antonio Fábregas, Jaume Mateu & Michael Putnam (eds), 99–122. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Real-Puigdollers, Cristina
2014Inserting roots into (functional) nodes: Categories and cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Analysis 39(1–2): 125–168.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2011The locative alternation crosslinguistically. Implications for resultative formation. Handout delivered at the Workshop on Verbal Elasticity, 3–5 October, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Wei Tham, Shiao
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans
2003A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa
1982Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, Eric Wanner & Lila Gleitman (eds), 319–346. New York NY: CUP.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Ursula
1997The Locative Alternation in German. Its Structure and Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20: 1–28.Google Scholar
Damonte, Federico
2006Classifier incorporation and the locative alternation. In Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Nicola Munaro, Giuseppina Turano & Walter Schweikert (eds), 83–103. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta
1991Detrás de la palabra. Estudios de gramática del español. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2010Directions from the GET-GO. On the syntax of manner of motion verbs in directional constructions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9: 23–53.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000‘The Garden Swarms with Bees’ and the fallacy of ‘argument alternation’. In Polysemy, Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds), 111–128. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa
2017Morphosyntactic defectiveness in complex predicate formation. In Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 120], Albert Álvarez González & Ía, Navarro (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2004On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Ramchand, Gillian
2005Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek Van Hout (eds), 81–105. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2011An alternative to deficiency approaches to the manner-alternation parameter. Paper presented at the Workshop on Verbal Elasticity, 3–5 October, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
2014Against deficiency-based typologies: Manner-alternation parameters in Italian and English. Paper presented at the Going Romance 28th , Lisboa, 4–6 December.
Gehrke, Berit
2008Ps in Motion. On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events [LOT Dissertation Series 184]. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele & Ackerman, Farrell
2001The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77(4): 798–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane & Vikner, Sten
1993Obligatory adjuncts and the structure of events. In Knowledge and Language, Vol. II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, Eric Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds), 145–159. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
de Groot, Casper
1998How to butter a sandwich. On ‘spread’ in Dutch and Hungarian from a typological perspective. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the occasion of his 70th birthday, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 61–72. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logo
Gruber, Jeffrey
1965Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. & Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2005How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In The Syntax of Aspect. Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 42–64. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011A minimalist approach to argument structure. In The Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 427–448. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D.
2009Hyponymous objects and late insertion. Lingua 119: 242–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michale
1995The applicative derivation and the “spray paint” alternation in Danish. University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 43–59.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun
1988Small clause results. Lingua 74: 101–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Mulder, René
1990Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication. The Linguistic Review 7: 1–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio & Masini, Francesca
2007The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings. Morphology 16: 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwata, Seizi
2008Locative Alternation. A Lexical-constructional Approach [Constructional Approaches to Language 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labelle, Marie
1992La structure argumentale des verbs locatifs à base nominale. Linguisticae Investigationes 16(2): 267–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000The semantic representation of denominal verbs. In Lexical Specification and Insertion, Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds), 215–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laffut, An
1998The locative alternation: A contrastive study of Dutch vs. English. Languages in Contrast 1(2): 127–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1991Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41: 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Morphology and lexical semantics. In The Handbook of Morphology, Arnold Zwicky & Andrew Spencer (eds), 248–271. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015Lexicalization patterns. Ms, Stanford University and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. [URL]
Levinson, Lisa
2010Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(1): 135–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2014aLa alternancia locativa en castellano y polaco: Un análisis tipológico construccional. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume
2000Why can’t we wipe the slate clean? A lexical-syntactic approach to resultative constructions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 71–95.Google Scholar
2002Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax-semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. [URL]
2005Arguing our way to the Direct Object Restriction (DOR) on English resultatives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008On the lexical syntax of directionality/resultativity: The case of Germanic preverbs. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 221–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 252–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Argument structure. In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, Ch. 2 , Andrew Carnie, Dan Siddiqi & Yosuke Sato (eds), 24–41. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume & Rigau, Gemma
2002A minimalist account of conflation processes: Parametric variation at the lexicon-syntax interface. In Theoretical Approaches to Universals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 49], Artemis Alexiadou (ed), 211–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Probus 22(2): 241–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2006Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maylor, Roger
2001On the status of Dutch. Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 81–96.Google Scholar
Mayoral Hernández, Roberto
2010The locative alternation: On the symmetry between verbal and prepositional locative paradigms. Probus 22(2): 211–239.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2004Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells. Linguistics 42(3): 523–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Particle verbs and argument structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(4): 350–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. & Ruppenhofer, Josef
2001Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Model of the German Applicative Pattern. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos
1998Las alternancias locativas en el marco de la semántica de los esquemas eventivos. IV Jornadas de Lingüística, 143–171. Universidad de Cádiz.Google Scholar
2003Semántica y gramática. Sucesos, papeles semánticos y relaciones sintácticas. Madrid: Antonio Machado Libros.Google Scholar
Mulder, René H.
1992The Aspectual Nature of Syntactic Complementation. PhD dissertation, Leiden: HIL Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
Oya, Toshiaki
2009Ground arguments in German particle verbs: A comparison with Dutch and English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 21(3): 257–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1989Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkännen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C.
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1998Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Real-Puigdollers, Cristina
2013Lexicalization by Phase: The Role of Prepositions in Argument Structure and its Cross-linguistic Variation. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara Thomas
1996Events and verb classification. Linguistics 34: 191–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salkoff, Morris
1983Bees are swarming in the garden: A systematic synchronic study of productivity. Language 59: 288–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2004Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32: 205–253.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 17: 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Washio, Ryuichi
1997Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen
2005Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. In The Syntax of Aspect. Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa & Oh, Eunjeong
2007On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bigolin, Alessandro & Josep Ausensi
2021. A new resultative construction in Spanish? A reply to Rodríguez Arrizabalaga. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Bigolin, Alessandro & Josep Ausensi
2021. A new resultative construction in Spanish? A reply to Rodríguez Arrizabalaga. Folia Linguistica 55:2  pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2020. A Head Movement Approach to Talmy’s Typology. Linguistic Inquiry 51:3  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Mangialavori Rasia, M. Eugenia & Nora Múgica
2022. Fugu Me! Roots and Denominal Verb Productivity: New Data. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:2  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Rasia, Maria Eugenia Mangialavori
2019. Stativity in the Causative Alternation? New Questions and a New Variant. Open Linguistics 5:1  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.