Chapter published in:
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 343–376

Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation

| University of Oregon
The study of hierarchical argument indexation systems shows that while the ranking of both 1st and 2nd person over other arguments is robust and reliable, it is impossible to find any compelling crosslinguistic evidence for one or the other ranking of the two Speech Act Participants, and rare to find a consistent ranking even within a single language. This paper assembles and reviews historical changes in the indexation of the “local” categories (1→2 and 2→1) in a number of Tibeto-Burman languages. We see that the fundamental deictic ranking SAP > 3 is conservative, and inverse marking to emphasize that ranking has been reinvented several times in the family. Changes in the marking of local categories are more diverse, but two phenomena recur independently in different languages and branches: a tendency for the 1→2 form to be uniquely marked, sometimes with forms which are not synchronically relatable to anything else in the paradigm, and a contrasting tendency for the 2→1 form to merge with the marking of 3→1. I propose that these tendencies reflect what I call sociopragmatic effects, i.e. the socially delicate nature of any and all natural utterances involving both the speaker and the addressee.
Published online: 26 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.10del
References

References

Barnard, John Terence Owen
1934 A Handbook of the Rawang Dialect of the Nung Language. Rangoon: Supdt., Govt. Printing and Stationery.Google Scholar
Bauman, James
1975 Pronouns and Pronominal Morphology in Tibeto-Burman. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2008 On the scope of the referential hierarchy in the typology of grammatical relations. In Case and Grammatical Relations, Greville Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 191–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Iemmolo, Giorgio, Zakharko, Taras & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2013 Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 15–36. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin
2015 First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boro, Krishna
2017 A Grammar of Hakhun Tangsa. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora
1998 Inverse direction and second person in Dumi. In Typology of Verbal Categories, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 85–93. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, Ross
1978 Participant rank and verbal cross-reference in Chepang. In Papers on discourse, Joseph Grimes (ed.), 163–78. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
1982 The Syntax and Morphology of the Verb in Chepang [Pacific Linguistics Series B, no. 84]. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Chhangte, Lalnunthangi
1993 Mizo Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000 Egophoricity in discourse and syntax. Functions of Language 7: 33–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981a An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981b The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1): 83–101.Google Scholar
1985 The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated change. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 367–389. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1): 1–38. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/HimalayanLinguistics​/articles​/2010​/PDF​/HLJ0901A​.pdf (24 April 2014).
2011a Agreement prefixes in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 10(1): 1–35. http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/HimalayanLinguistics​/journal​/1001​.html (24 April 2014).
2011b Nocte and Jinghpaw: Morphological correspondences. In North East Indian Linguistics 3, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds), 61–75. New Delhi: Foundation/CUP India. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Argument indexation (verb agreement) in Kuki-Chin. presented at the 46th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Dartmouth College. https://​www​.academia​.edu​/4155394​/Argument​_Indexation​_Verb​_Agreement​_in​_Kuki​-Chin (10 November 2015).
2014 Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1): 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George
1988 The verbal morphology of Dumi Rai simplicia. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(1): 134–207.Google Scholar
1993 A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen
1987 Grammatical marking of Speech Act Participants in Tibeto-Burman. Journal of Pragmatics 11(4): 473–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 On the evidence for the relationship Kiranti-Rung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 13(1): 57–58.Google Scholar
1991 Inverse and pseudo-inverse prefixes in Kiranti languages: Evidence from Belhare. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1): 73–92.Google Scholar
1994 The Structure of Kiranti Languages [Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 13]. Zurich: Universität Zurich.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena
2005 The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9(1): 77–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Jirsa, Bill
2006 The Principle of Indirect Means in language use and language structure. Journal of Pragmatics 38(4): 513–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
1988 Notes on the structure of the Sunwari transitive verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11(2): 62–92.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1994 Semantic and pragmatic inverse: ‘Inverse alignment’ and ‘inverse voice’ in Carib of Surinam. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed), 187–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Jansen, Joana
2018 The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1994 The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014 The personal agreement system of Zbu Rgyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1): 44–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1991 Pragmatic disguise in pronominal-affix paradigms. In Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection, Frans Plank (ed.), 75–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Pragmatic skewing in 1 ←→ 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(2): 83–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie Jane Andrina
1965 Tiddim Chin: A Descriptive Analysis of Two Texts. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004 Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). PhD dissertation, Université Paris VII.Google Scholar
2010 The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1): 127–157.Google Scholar
2012 Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrong and Kiranti. Languages and Linguistics 13(1): 83–116.Google Scholar
2018 Generic person marking in Japhug and other Gyalrong languages. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton
2014 Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7): 301–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 The direction(s) of analogical change in direct/inverse systems. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Lahaussois, Aimée, Michailovsky, Boyd & Bahadur Rai, Dhan
2012 An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6): 1095–1170.Google Scholar
King, John
2002 Marked transitive scenarios and archaic biactinal agreement morphology in Dhimal. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34: 39–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kongkham, Hemabati
2010 A Descriptive Grammar of Moyon. PhD dissertation, Manipur University.Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda
2015 A new type of convergence at the deictic center: Second person and cislocative in Karbi (Tibeto-Burman). Studies in Language 39(1): 24–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964 The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimee
2003 Thulung Rai. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 1: 1–25. http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/6vm893kj (10 November 2015).
Lai, Yunfan
2015 The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (rGyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 271–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy
2010 Hierarchical person marking in the Rawang language. In Forty Years of Sino-Tibetan Language Studies: Proceedings of ICSTLL-40, Dai Zhaoming (ed.), 107–113. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Ch’ang-p’ei
1945 A preliminary study on the Trung language of Kung Shan. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 8: 343–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Hunter & Macaulay, Monica
2012 Prominence hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass 6–7: 431–446.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica
2009 On prominence hierarchies: Evidence from Algonquian. Linguistic Typology 13(3): 357–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morey, Stephen
2016 The internal diversity of Tangsa: Vocabulary and morphosyntax. In Language and Culture in Northeast India and Beyond: In Honor of Robbins Burling, Mark Post, Stephen Morey & Scott DeLancey (eds), 23–40. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Morse, Robert
1965 Syntactic frames for the Rvwang (Rawang) verb. Lingua 15: 338–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Harré, Rom
1990 Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean
2004 A Grammar of Wambule. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris
1994 The Tupí-Guaraní inverse. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox, & Paul Hopper (eds), 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reichle, Verena
1981 Bawm Language and Lore. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sharma, H Surmangol. & Singh, N. Gopendro
2011 Person-marking prefixes of Purum. In North East Indian Linguistics 3, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds), 61–75. New Delhi: Foundation/CUP India. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai
1982 Dulong yu jianzhi (Outline of Trung). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
1983 Wo guo zang-mian yu dungci-de rencheng fanchou (The category of personal agreement of the verb in Tibeto-Burman languages of China). Minzu Yuwen 1983(2): 17–29.Google Scholar
1984 Woguo bufen ZangMianyu zhong mingci de rencheng lingshu fanchou (The personal possessive category of nouns in some Tibeto-Burman languages of China). Zhongyang Minzu Xuebao 1984(1): 78–84.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson Tianshin
2014 Typology of generic-person marking in Tshobdun Rgyalrong. In Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text, Richard Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds), 225–248. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson Tianshin & Shi, Danluo
2002 Caodeng Jiarongyu yu “rentong dengdi” xiangguan de yufa xianxiang (The Empathy Hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics 3(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson Tianshin & Qianzi, Tian
2013 Huoeryu Gexihua dongci dueixie (Verb agreement in Gexi Horpa). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 7(2): 221–241.Google Scholar
Thompson, Chad
1990 On the treatment of topical objects in Chepang: Passive or inverse? Studies in Language 14(2):405–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toba, Sueyoshi
1979 Khaling (Asian and African Grammatical Manual 13d). Tokyo: Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku.Google Scholar
Watters, David
2002 A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weidert, Alfons
1985 Paradigmatic typology and verb agreement analysis. In Studia Linguistica Diachronica et Synchronica: Werner Winter Sexagenario Anno MCMLXXXIII, Ursula Pieper & Gerhard Stickel (eds), 903–936. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, Zakharko, Taras, Bierkandt, Lennart, Zúñiga, Fernando & Bickel, Balthasar
2016 Decomposing hierarchical alignment: Co-arguments and conditions on alignment. Linguistics 54(3): 531–561.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006 Deixis and Alignment: Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 How many hierarchies, really? Evidence from several Algonquian languages. In Scales [Linguistische Arbeits Berichte 86], Marc Richards & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 277–294. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Gildea, Spike & Joana Jansen
2018.  In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 129 ff. Crossref logo
Guillaume, Antoine
2018.  In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume & Thomas Pellard
2020. Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis. Diachronica Crossref logo
Konnerth, Linda
2020. On the nature of inverse systems. Diachronica Crossref logo
Ozerov, Pavel
2018. Tone assignment and grammatical tone in Anal (Tibeto-Burman). Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 708 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.