Chapter published in:
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 403424
References

References

Aissen, Judith
1997On the syntax of obviation. Language 73(4): 705–750. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Gaenzle, Martin, Rai, Arjun, Shoj Rai, Prem, Rai, Shree Kumar, Rai, Vishnu & Sharma, Narayan P.
2007Two ways of suspending object agreement in Puma: Between incorporation, antipassivization, and optional agreement. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 7: 1–19.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1): 83–101.Google Scholar
2010Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1994The discourse function of the Kutenai inverse. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], Talmy Givón (ed.), 65–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2011Ute Reference Grammar [Culture and Language Use. Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1): 44–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). PhD dissertation, Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot.Google Scholar
2010The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1): 127–157.Google Scholar
2012aAgreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1): 83–116.Google Scholar
2012bArgument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Ergativity, Valency and Voice, Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds), 199–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012cFrom denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122(11): 1207–1231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014aClause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 263–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bDenominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Subjects, objects and relativization in Japhug. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 44(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Antonov, Anton
2014Direct / inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7): 301–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Konnerth, Linda
2016The Proto-Tibeto-Burman *gV- nominalizing prefix. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area, University of Oregon 39(1): 3–32.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2013La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. MA thesis, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
2015The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 271–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Youjing
2009Units in Zhuokeji rGyalrong Discourse: Prosody and Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Lín, Xiàngróng
(林向榮). 1993Jiāróngyǔyánjiū 嘉戎語研究 (A study on the Rgyalrong language). Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Mazaudon, Martine, Michaud, Alexis, Guillaume, Séverine, François, Alexandre & Adamou, Evangelia
2014Documenting and researching endangered languages: The Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 8: 119–135.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
Under review. Nominalization-based voice constructions as a cross-linguistic type.
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2000Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1): 161–190.Google Scholar
2003Caodeng rGyalrong. In The Sino-Tibetan languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014Typology of generic-person marking in Tshobdun Rgyalrong. In Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text, Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds), 225–248. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2015黑水縣沙石多嘉戎語動詞人稱範疇的特點 (Remarkable features in the verb agreement system of Sastod Rgyalrong in Khrochu county). Language and Linguistics 16(5): 731–750.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Lin, Youjing
2007Constructional variation in rGyalrong relativization: How to make a choice? In Pre-Conference Proceedings of the International Workshop on Relative Clauses, 205–226. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shi, Danluo
2002 Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語法現象 (Empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics 3(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Wei, Jie-Wu
2001Verbal prefixation in Zhuokeji Rgyalrong: The problem of kə-/ka- alternation. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuya
To appear. From proximate/obviative to number marking: Reanalysis of hierarchical indexation in rgyalrong languages. Journal of Chinese Linguistics.
Cited by

Cited by other publications

DeLancey, Scott
2018.  In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121],  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume & Thomas Pellard
2020. Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis. Diachronica Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.