Cover not available
Part of
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 1–28

Synchronic vs. diachronic approaches to typological hierarchies

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Typological hierarchies: Some traditional explanations and open issues
  • 3.Synchronic distributional patterns and their diachronic sources
  • 4.Multiple diachronic origins
  • 5.Accounting for exceptions
  • 6.Concluding remarks: Diachronic vs. synchronic explanations of typological hierarchies
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.int
References

References

Aissen, Judith
2003 Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2016 Synchronic vs. Diachronic Explanations and the Nature of the Language Faculty. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 11–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristar, Anthony R.
1991 On diachronic sources and synchronic patterns: An investigation into the origin of linguistic universals. Language 67: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2001 The Atoms of Language. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & McCloskey, James
2007 On the relation of typology to theoretical syntax. Linguistic Typology 11: 285–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2007 Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11: 239–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2014 Evolutionary phonology and the life cycle of voiceless sonorants. [URL]
2004 Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1998 A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1988 The diachronic dimension in explanation. In Explaining Language Universals, John A. Hawkins (ed.), 350–379. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 Language change and universals. In Linguistic Universals, Ricardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds), 179–194. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Formal universals as emergent phenomena: The origins of structure preservation. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 108–121. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1980 Inverse verb forms in Siberia: Evidence from Chukchee, Koryak, and Kamchadal. Folia Linguistica 1: 61–74.Google Scholar
1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2000 Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2018 The obligatory coding principle in diachronic perspective. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2011 Language universals and linguistic knowledge. In Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 227–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013 The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Languages across Boundaries: Studies in the Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 69–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Competing motivations and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations? In MacWhinney, Malchukov & Moravcsik (eds), 282–298.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Implicational universals and dependencies between grammatical phenomena. In Dependencies in Language: On the Causal Ontology of Linguistic Systems, Nicholas Enfield (ed.), 9–24. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981 An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57: 626–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1979 Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Functionalism and the metalanguage – Theory confusion. In Phonology, Morphology, and the Empirical Imperative: Papers in Honour of Bruce Derwing, Grace Wiebe, Gary Libben, Tom Priestly, Ron Smyth & Sam Wang (eds), 27–59. Taipei: The Crane.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John A.
1985 Competing motivations. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 343–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
1990 The origin of NP split ergativity. Language 66: 261–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1998 On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Zúñiga, Fernando
2016 Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Linguistics (54): 483–529.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001 Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966 Language Universals, with Particular Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1978 Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 1: Method and Theory, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles H. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsick (eds), 62–91. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1995 The diachronic typological approach. In Approaches to Language Typology, Masayoshi Shibatani & Theadora Bynon (eds), 145–166. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Aaron
2018 Diachrony and the referential hierarchy in Old Irish. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2005 Occurrence of nominal plurality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Bernard Comrie, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 142–145. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 185–214. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Descriptive scales versus comparative scales. In Richards & Malchukov (eds), 39–53.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1983 Word Order Universals. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994 A Performance Theory of Word Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004 Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1996 Pragmatic skewing in 1<->2 pronominal combinations in native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64: 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Song, Kyung An
2011 On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47: 1–44. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary
2008 The rise and fall of semantic alignment in Northern Halmahera, Indonesia. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment , Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 252–276. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2011 A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121: 1518–1538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 On the directionality of analogy in a Dhegiha paradigm. International Journal of American Linguistics 82: 239–248.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2008 Universals constrain change; Change results in typological generalizations. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 23–53. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Zúñiga, Fernando
2014 Recent developments and open questions in the field of semantic roles. Studies in Language 38: 437–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Hunter T. & Macaulay, Monica
2012 Prominence hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass 36: 431–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej & Moravcsik, Edith
(eds). 2014 Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2000 A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4: 307–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaud, Alexis, Jacques, Guillaume & Rankin, Robert L.
2012 Historical transfer of nasality between consonantal onset and vowel: From C to V or from V to C? Diachronica 29: 201–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1991a Active / agentive case marking and its motivation. Language 67: 510–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991b The develoment of bound pronominal paradigms. In Language Typology 1988: Typological Models in Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 81], Winfred P. Lehmann & Helen-Jo Jakusz Hewitt (eds), 85–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Reconstructing the unidentified. In Historical Linguistics 1989 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 106] Henk Aertsen & Robert J. Jeffers (eds), 329–347. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Functional perspectives on syntactic change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Richard D. Janda & Brian D. Joseph (eds), 552–572. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Ergativity and language contact on the Oregon Coast: Alsea, Siuslaw, and Coosan. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 77–95. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2008 The emergence of agentive systems in core argument marking. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), The Typology of Semantic Alignment, 297–333. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Deconstructing teleology: The place of synchronic usage patterns among processes of diachronic development. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne & Chafe, Wallace
1999 What are S, A, and O? Studies in Language 23: 569–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A.
1978 On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45: 233–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998 Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002 Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally-based optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 43–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Possible and Probable Languages. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992 Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Marc & Malchukov, Andrej L.
2008 Scales. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2018 Are the Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexing systems really motivated by the person hierarchy? In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004 Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aborigenal Studies.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2001 Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard D.
2005 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006 Deixis and Alignment [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Deixis and alignment: How many hierarchies, really? Evidence from several Algonquian languages. In Richards & Malchukov (eds), 99–129.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Ballarè, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
2022. The development of locative relative markers. Studies in Language 46:1 ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Berman, Ruth A. & Elitzur Dattner
2020. Introduction. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chappell, Hilary
2023. From oblique to core case in the Southern Min languages. Journal of Historical Linguistics DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2018. Chapter 3. Deconstructing teleology. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Rose, Françoise
2018. Chapter 8. Are the Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexing systems really motivated by the person hierarchy?. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.