Chapter published in:
Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 138
References

References

Anderson, Stephen R.
1976On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 1–23. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery D.
2007Relative clause. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Revised second edition.Google Scholar
Artiagoitia, Xabier
2003Complementation. In José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), A Grammar of Basque, 634–710. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson
2005Case and control constructions in German, Faroese and Icelandic. Or how to evaluate marginally-acceptable data? Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 75. 1–36.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2004Hidden syntax in Belhare. In Anju Saxena (ed.), Himalayan Linguistics: Past and Present, 141–190. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010aCapturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-Hierarchy and Clause-linking: The Syntax and Pragmatics Interface, 51–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bGrammatical relations typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Giorgio Iemmolo, Taras Zakharko & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2013Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Languages across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, 15–36. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Case marking and alignment. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 304–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2008Referential scales and case alignment: reviewing the typological evidence. In Marc Richards & Andrej Malchukov (eds), Scales, 1–37. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kamal K. Choudhary, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2015aThe neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. PloS One 10(8). e0132819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich & Taras Zakharko
2015bTypological evidence against universal effects of referential scales on case alignment. In Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Andrej L. Malchukov & Marc Richards (eds), Scales and Hierarchies: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective, 7–43. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko & Giorgio Iemmolo
2015cExploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds), Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective, 29–52. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Yogendra P. Yādava
2000A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 110(5): 343–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Taras Zakharko, Lennart Bierkandt & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2014Semantic role clustering: An empirical assessment of semantic role types in non-default case assignment. Studies in Language 38(3): 485–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birchall, Joshua
2014Argument Marking Patterns in South American Languages PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1982Der präpositionale Akkusativ im Sardischen. In Otto Winkelmann & Maria Braisch (eds), Festschrift für Johannes Hubschmid zum 65. Geburtstag, 579–599. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
1985Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1998Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues de l’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 193–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1982Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13(3): 343–434.Google Scholar
Bresnan, JoanJ, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen & Stephen Wechsler
2015Lexical-Functional Syntax. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell 2nd edn. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broadwell, Georg Aaron
2006A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In Winfred Philipp Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1985Reflections on subject and object control. Journal of Semantics 4(1): 47–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Coreference and conjunction reduction in grammar and discourse. In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, 186–208. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
1993Argument structure. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, vol. 1, 905–914. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013aAlignment of case marking of full noun phrases. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/98.Google Scholar
2013bAlignment of case marking of pronouns. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/99.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath, Andrej Malchukov & Søren Wichmann
2015Introduction. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Vol. 1. Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, 3–26. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1998Event structure in argument linking. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), The Projection of Arguments, 1–43. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
2011Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen & Peter de Swart
(eds) 2008Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. AIkhenvald (eds), Complementation: A Cross-lingiustic Typology, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Søren Wichmann
(eds) 2008The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1997Are grammatical relations universal? In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Givón, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dum-Tragut, Jasmine
2009Armenian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Patrick
2005Grammatical Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A.
2008The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Jr. Van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2013A Grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, Shin
2007On the control/raising ambiguity with aspectual verbs: A structural account. In Barbara Stiebels (ed.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47: Studies in complement control, 159–195. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2007A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Fernando Zúñiga
2016Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Linguistics 54(4): 483–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1997Grammatical relations: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective, 1–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
(eds) 2013Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​valpal​.info/.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1990The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aArgument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Languages across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bDitransitive constructions: The verb ‘give’. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/105.Google Scholar
2014Arguments and adjuncts as language-particular syntactic categories and as comparative concepts. Linguistic Discovery 12(2): 3–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Iren Hartmann
2015Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Vol. 1 Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, 41–72. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina
2006A Grammar of Movima. PhD dissertation, Radboud University.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina & Fernando Zúñiga
2016Inverse and symmetrical voice: On languages with two transitive constructions. Linguistics 54(3): 443–481.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard & Wolfgang Schenkel
1991 Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Didistribution deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Niemeyer 8th edn.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2005The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio
2010Topicality and differential object marking. Studies in Language 34(2): 239–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Towards a typological study of differential object marking and differential object indexation. PhD dissertation, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
2013Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 66: 378–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I.
2001The passive voice. In Martin Haspelmath, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals, vol. 2, 899–916. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 305–334. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Relative clauses. In Timothy Shope (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 2, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63–99.Google Scholar
1979Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55(2): 333–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer
2007Passive in the world’s languages. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khrakovsky, Viktor
1979Diathesis. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 29(3–4): 289–309.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian
2010A Grammar of Teiwa. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Christa
2008Case in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Christa & Bernd Heine
2010Are there ditransitive verbs in !Xun? In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, 45–81. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul
1993Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
1993Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63: 759–813.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1984Der Relativsatz. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1986On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics 24(4): 663–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N.
(ed.) 1976Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liljegren, Henrik
2016A Grammar of Palula. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Bernard Comrie
(eds) 2015Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie
2010aDitransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, 1–35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(eds) 2010bStudies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Graham & Barry Blake
1981Language Typology: Cross-linguistic Studies in Syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1993The inflectional category of voice: Towards a more rigorous definition. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), Causatives and Transitivity, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006aAspects of the Theory of Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006bCalculus of possibilities as a technique in linguistic typology. In Felix Kofi. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), Catching Language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor & Alexandr Xolodovič
1970K teorii grammaticheskogo zaloga. Narody Azii iAfriki 4: 111–124.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca
1985Split intransitivity: Functional oppositions in intransitive inflection. In Johanna Nichols & Anthony C. Woodbury (eds), Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause: Some Approaches to Theory from the Field, 324–362. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith
1978On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45(3–4): 233–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mous, Maarten & Abel Mreta
2004The comitative/conjunctive preposition na in Chathu (Pare), a Bantu language of Tanzania. South African Journal of African Languages 24(4): 219–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1986Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1): 56–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Linguistic Diversity in space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Maria Tolskaya
2001A grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Michael Leon
1981Barai clause junctures. Toward a functional theory of interclausal relations. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon
2007A Grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
2009The semantics of clause linking in Aguaruna. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), The Semantics of Clause Linking, 167–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1968Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1970The two verbs begin . In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 107–119. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A.
2006Applicative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
(ed.) 1979Ergativity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2005Antipassive constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 438–441. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013Antipassive constructions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/108.Google Scholar
2017Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, 308–331. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polome, Edgar
1967Swahili language handbook. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice
1999Cases and thematic roles. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Mismatches in semantic role hierarchies and the dimensions of role semantics. In Ina Bornkessel, Matthias Schlesewsky, Bernard Comrie & Angela D. Friederici (eds), Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives, 53–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Riesberg, Sonja
2014Symmetrical Voice and Linking in Western Austronesian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2015When “you” and “I” mess around with the hierarchy: A comparative study of Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexing systems. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciencias Humanas 10(2): 347–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009A hierarchical indexation system: The example of Emerillon (Teko). In Patience L. Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, 63–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana
2015A Grammar of Yakkha. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schikowski, Robert, Netra P. Paudyal & Balthasar Bickel
2015Flexible valency in Chintang. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), Valency Classes in the world’s Languages, vol. 1, 669–7007. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A. & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
(eds) 2018Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2004Voice. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, vol. 2, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1998On nominal and verbal person marking. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 1–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Verbal person marking. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/102.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, Robert M. W. (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sinnemӓki, Kaius
2014A typological perspective on Differential Object Marking. Linguistics 52(2): 281–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Lesley
1993Switch-reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Høskuldur
2007The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Mark L. O.
2008A Grammar of Eton. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik & Jeremy Hammond
(eds) 2016Switch Reference 2.0. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
1980On the distribution of passive and antipassive constructions in universal grammar. Lingua 50(4): 303–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language 5(3): 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Pragmatics, ergativity and grammatical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 7(1): 63–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2011Typological Variations in Grammatical Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ilja A. Seržant
2018Differential argument marking: Patterns of variation. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds), Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking, 1–40. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, Taras Zakharko, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zúñiga & Balthasar Bickel
2016Decomposing hierarchical alignment: co-arguments as conditions on alignment and the limits of referential hierarchies as explanations in verb agreement. Linguistics 54(3): 531–561. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xolodovič, Alexandr
(ed.). 1974Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcij: diatezy i zalogi. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2007From the typology of inversion to the typology of alignment. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wӓlchli (eds), New Challenges in Typology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations, 200–221. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021.  In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sinnemäki, Kaius
2020. Linguistic system and sociolinguistic environment as competing factors in linguistic variation: A typological approach. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 6:2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.