Chapter published in:
Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 213256
Aissen, Judith
1999Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17(4): 673–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2011Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Relations, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2004On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 95–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626–657. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1972The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
1997A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, 71–113, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William
1998Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at the 3rd LFG conference, Brisbane, 30 June–3 July.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2005Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina
2006A Grammar of Movima. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
2009aHierarchical alignment in Movima. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(4): 513–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bReference and predication in Movima. In New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 323–342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010a‘She kisses her late husband’ = ‘she kissed her husband’: nominal tense marking in Movima. In Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity, Michael Cysouw & Jan Wohlgemuth (eds), 95–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bThe intransitive basis of Movima clause structure. In Ergativity in Amazonia[Typological Studies in Language 89] Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds), 285–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011aReferring to states and events: subordination in Movima. In Subordination in South American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 141–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bArgument encoding in Movima: The local domain. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4): 559–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The expression of three-participant events in Movima. Linguistic Discovery 10(3): 80–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Animacy and inverse voice in Movima: A corpus study. Anthropological Linguistics 56(3–4): 294–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018aNonverbal predication in Movima. In Nonverbal predication in Amazonian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 122], Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Gildea (eds), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018bA topic-marking cleft? Analyzing clause-initial pronouns in Movima. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in Prosody and Syntax[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina & Zúñiga, Fernando
2016Inverse and symmetrical voice: On languages with two transitive constructions. Linguistics 54(3): 443–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2005Tagalog. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds), 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, Peter Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds), 247–293. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2009Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35(1): 1–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 305–334. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R.
1993Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976 “The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 491–518. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1988Voice in Philippine languages. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Rober M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006Deixis and Alignment. Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Haude, Katharina
2018.  In Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 122],  pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.