Cover not available
Part of
Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 1–34

Grammatical relations in Kubeo

| University of Brasilia
| University of California, Santa Barbara

This paper describes a number of argument selectors for grammatical relations in Kubeo, an Eastern Tukanoan language spoken in the Vaupes River area in Northwestern Amazonia. The main selectors discussed in this paper are: verbal agreement, case marking, constituent ordering, causative, applicative, non-finite clauses, passive, noun incorporation and anaphoric constructions. The overwhelming grammatical pattern selects S, A, and Aditr for similar treatment in contrast to the remaining argument types; some constructions suggest a distinction between two types of S arguments, which we analyze as Sa versus Sp. The language presents the phenomenon of differential object marking, as well as analytical challenges related to non-canonical passivization and the way that animacy, referentiality and argument hierarchies correlate in the organization of grammatical relations.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Verb agreement
    • 2.1Finite verb agreement
      • 2.1.1Non-agreeing constructions
    • 2.2Imperatives and exhortatives
    • 2.3Agreement in nominalized clauses
  • 3.Case marking
    • 3.1Aditr, As and Sa
    • 3.2G, T and P
      • 3.2.1Non-canonical bivalent constructions and Sp case marking
    • 3.3Adjuncts with -re
    • 3.4Case-marking and non-finite clauses
  • 4.Constituent order
  • 5.Valence increasing operations
    • 5.1Causative constructions
    • 5.2Applicative constructions
  • 6.Valence-decreasing operations
    • 6.1Noun Incorporation
    • 6.2Passivization
      • 6.2.1Non-canonical passive constructions
  • 7.Resolution of anaphora
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.11cha
References
Anderson, R. Stephen
2005 Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1988 Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In New Analyses in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 69], Dieter Wanner & Douglas A. Kibbee (eds), 143–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chacon, Thiago Costa
2009 Lexical and viewpoint aspect in Kubeo. In Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America-IV. Austin TX. [URL]Google Scholar
2012 The Phonology and Morphology of Kubeo: The Documentation, Theory and Description of an Amazonian Language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
2013 Kubeo: Linguistic and cultural interactions in the Upper Rio Negro. In Upper Rio Negro: Cultural and Linguistic Interactions in Northwestern Amazonia, Kristine Stenzel & Patience Epps (eds), 129–162. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional / Museu do Índio (FUNAI).Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2007 Word order. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause structure, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224–275. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, Cari, Criswellm, Linda & Morse, Nancy L.
2000 El cubeo. In Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptiva, María Stella González de Pérez & María Luisa Rodríguez de Montes (eds), 357–372. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 On the nature of noun incorporation. Language 62(1): 32–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morse, Nancy & Maxwell, Michael B.
1999 Cubeo Grammar. Arlington: SIL/University of Texas Arlington Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Nancy, Salser Jr., Jay K. & Salser, Neve
(eds) 1999 Diccionario Ilustrado Bilíngüe Cubeo- Español/Español-Cubeo. Bogotá: Editorial Alberto Lleras Camargo.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Henri
1997  A fala Tukano dos Ye’pâ-Masa, Tomo I: Gramática, Tomo II: Dicionário , Tomo III: Método de aprendizagem. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionaria da Amazônia: Brazil.Google Scholar
Salser, Jay K. Jr.
1971 Cubeo phonemics. Linguistics 75: 74–79.Google Scholar
Salser, Jay K.Jr. & Salser, Neva
1976 Fonología del cubeo. In Sistemas fonológicos de idiomas colombianos, 3, 71–79. Lomalinda: Editorial Townsend.Google Scholar
Salser, Jay K. Jr.
1977a Some features of Cubeo discourse and sentence structure. In Discourse Grammar: Studies in Indigenous Languages of Colombia, Panama, and Ecuador, Part 2, Robert E. Longacre & Frances Woods (eds), 253–272. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
1977b Estructura del discurso y de la oración en el cubeo. In Estudios tucanos 2, Carol Heinze (ed.), 1–45. Bogota: Ministerio de Gobierno.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine
2013 A Reference Grammar of Kotiria (Wanano). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valencia, Simon
1989 Fonología y classificaci´øn nominal en Kubeo. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Verma, Manindra K. & Mohanon, K. P.
(eds) 1990 Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
de Vries, Lourens
2013 Seeing, hearing and thinking in Korowai, a language of West Papua. In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds), 111–136. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich & Balthasar Bickel
2013 Handbook of Grammatical Relations questionnaire.Google Scholar
Wycliffe Bible Translators
2009 MAJEPACɄ JŨ̶MENIJICɄI YÁVAIYE MAMAENE COYɄITUCUBO. El Nuevo Testamento en el idioma cubeo de Colombia. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Chacon, Thiago Costa
2022. Gender and Noun Class Markers in Kubeo (Tukanoan). Faits de Langues 52:2 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.