Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 169–194

Chapter 3
Nominalization in cross-linguistic diachronic perspective

| University of Pavia

While more and more data are now available on languages rich in nominalizations, such as those of Latin America, the literature on nominalization is mainly synchronically orientented. The paper discusses several pieces of diachronic evidence about the origins of nominalization cross-linguistically. This evidence challenges the idea, widely held in the functional-typological literature, that the use of nominalizations reflects a non-default treatment of particular expressions, and that this motivates the distinguishing properties of nominalizations vis-a-vis other constructions. Diachronic evidence also points to possible motivations for the fact that nominalizations fail to consistently display the same structural properties, both cross-linguistically and within individual languages, and fail to be consistently used in the same contexts from one language to another.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some traditional assumptions about nominalization
  • 3.Nominalization and the origins of nominalizers
  • 4.Diachrony and the structural diversity of nominalizations
  • 5.Diachrony and the distribution of nominalizations
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.03cri
References (58)
Beyer, Stephan V.
1992 The Classical Tibetan language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B.
2004 A Grammar of Trio, a Cariban Language of Suriname. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carlson, Robert
1994 A Grammar of Supyire. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine & Estrada-Fernández, Zarina
(eds) 2016 Finiteness and Nominalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Estrada-Fernández, Zarina
(eds) 2012 Relative clauses in languages of Americas. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A.
2007 Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd Edition, Volume 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 334–381. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003 Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007 Deconstructing categories: Finiteness in a functional-typological perspective. In Finiteness: all over the clause. Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 91–114, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012 Cognitive explanations, distributional evidence, and diachrony. Studies in Language 36, 645–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Routes to Insubordination: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Insubordination, Evans, Nicholas R. & Watanabe, Honoré (eds), 393–422. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
da Silva Facundes, Sidney
2000 The Language of the Apurinã People of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
DeLancey, Scott
1986 Relativization as nominalization in Tibetan and Newari’. Ms, University of Oregon. <[URL]- [URL]>
1999 Relativization in Tibetan. In Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds), 231–249. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
2003 Lhasa Tibetan. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 270–88. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C.
1979 Hixkaryana. Lingua Descriptive Studies. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy
2009 Nominalization and the evolution of subordination. In Syntactic Complexity, Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 199–214. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience
2008 A Grammar of Hup. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina
2008 Cláusolas relativas en pima bajo. Línguas Indígenas Americanas 8, 69–83.Google Scholar
2012 From demonstrative to relative marker to clause linker: Relative clause formation in Pima Bajo. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 127–146. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.
(2007) Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: all over the clause, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
1995 The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 19, 61–75.Google Scholar
Gildea, S.
(1998) On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2012 Towards a diachronic of relative clause. In Bernard Comrie and Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorbet, Larry P.
1976 A Grammar of Diegueño Nominals. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003 Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds), 576–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007 The genesis of grammar : a reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild
1984 Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1992 Non-verbal predication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
1991 Nominalization, relativization, and attribution in Lotha, Angami, and Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14, 55–72.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1984 The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60, 703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 The iconicity of the universal categories noun and verb. In Iconicity in Syntax, John Haiman (ed.), 151–183. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Marja
1993 Nominalizations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Nouns and verbs. Language 63, 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II : Descriptive Applications . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langdon, Margaret
1970 A Grammar of Diegueño. The Mesa Grande Dialect. University of California Publications in Linguistics 66. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003 Qiang. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 573–87. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Huang, Chenglong
1996 A Grammar of Qiang. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2004 Nominalization/verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. München and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Miller, Amy
2001 A Grammar of Jamul Tiipay. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 83, 69–119.Google Scholar
Moore, Denny
1989 Gavião Nominalizations as Relative Clauses and Sentential Complements Equivalents. International Journal of American Linguistics 55, 309–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela
1976 Mojave Syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997 Versatile Nominalizations. In Essays in language function and language type, Bybee, Joan, Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd Edition, Volume 2: Complex constructions , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 52–150. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakel, Jeannette
2004 A Grammar of Mosetén. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & bin Makhashen, Khaled A.
2009 Nominalization in Soqotri, a South Arabian language of Yemen. In Endangered languages: Contributions to Morphology and Morpho-syntax , Wetzels, W. Leo (ed.), 9–31. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.
2005 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina & Muysken, Pieter
(eds) 2011 Subordination in Native South American Languages. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Alejandra
2001 Pilagá Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
Weber, David J.
1983 Relativization and nominalized clauses in Huallaga (Huanaco) Quechua. University of California Publications in Linguistics 103. Berkeley and Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1989 A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánaco) Quechua. University of California Publications in Linguistics 112. Berkeley and Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Wang, Jiao
2011 From light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of zhe and suo in Old and Middle Chinese. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, Yap, Foong-Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick (eds), 61–108. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick
2011 Introduction. Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, Yap, Foong-Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick (eds), 1–57. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Álvarez González, Albert
2019. Chapter 7. The ‘relative’ illusion and the origin of non-subject nominalizers in Cahita (Uto-Aztecan). In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.