Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 169–194

Chapter 3
Nominalization in cross-linguistic diachronic perspective

| University of Pavia
While more and more data are now available on languages rich in nominalizations, such as those of Latin America, the literature on nominalization is mainly synchronically orientented. The paper discusses several pieces of diachronic evidence about the origins of nominalization cross-linguistically. This evidence challenges the idea, widely held in the functional-typological literature, that the use of nominalizations reflects a non-default treatment of particular expressions, and that this motivates the distinguishing properties of nominalizations vis-a-vis other constructions. Diachronic evidence also points to possible motivations for the fact that nominalizations fail to consistently display the same structural properties, both cross-linguistically and within individual languages, and fail to be consistently used in the same contexts from one language to another.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some traditional assumptions about nominalization
  • 3.Nominalization and the origins of nominalizers
  • 4.Diachrony and the structural diversity of nominalizations
  • 5.Diachrony and the distribution of nominalizations
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.03cri
References (58)
References
Beyer, Stephan V. .1992. The Classical Tibetan language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. 2004. A Grammar of Trio, a Cariban Language of Suriname. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carlson, Robert. 1994. A Grammar of Supyire. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamoreau, Claudine & Estrada-Fernández, Zarina (eds). 2016. Finiteness and Nominalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Estrada-Fernández, Zarina (eds). 2012. Relative clauses in languages of Americas. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A. 2007. Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd Edition, Volume 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 334–381. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2007. Deconstructing categories: Finiteness in a functional-typological perspective. In Finiteness: all over the clause. Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 91–114, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Cognitive explanations, distributional evidence, and diachrony. Studies in Language 36, 645–670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Routes to Insubordination: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Insubordination, Evans, Nicholas R. & Watanabe, Honoré (eds), 393–422. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
da Silva Facundes, Sidney. 2000. The Language of the Apurinã People of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Relativization as nominalization in Tibetan and Newari’. Ms, University of Oregon. <[URL]- [URL]>
. 1999. Relativization in Tibetan. In Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds), 231–249. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
. 2003. Lhasa Tibetan. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 270–88. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1979. Hixkaryana. Lingua Descriptive Studies. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2009. Nominalization and the evolution of subordination. In Syntactic Complexity, Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 199–214. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2008. A Grammar of Hup. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina. 2008. Cláusolas relativas en pima bajo. Línguas Indígenas Americanas 8, 69–83.Google Scholar
. 2012. From demonstrative to relative marker to clause linker: Relative clause formation in Pima Bajo. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 127–146. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: all over the clause, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1995. The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 19, 61–75.Google Scholar
Gildea, S. (1998). On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2012. Towards a diachronic of relative clause. In Bernard Comrie and Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 1–26. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorbet, Larry P. 1976. A Grammar of Diegueño Nominals. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds), 576–601. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2007. The genesis of grammar : a reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechtild. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 1991. Nominalization, relativization, and attribution in Lotha, Angami, and Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14, 55–72.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60, 703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. The iconicity of the universal categories noun and verb. In Iconicity in Syntax, John Haiman (ed.), 151–183. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Marja. 1993. Nominalizations. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Nouns and verbs. Language 63, 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II : Descriptive Applications . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langdon, Margaret. 1970. A Grammar of Diegueño. The Mesa Grande Dialect. University of California Publications in Linguistics 66. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 2003. Qiang. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 573–87. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Huang, Chenglong. 1996. A Grammar of Qiang. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2004. Nominalization/verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. München and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Miller, Amy. 2001. A Grammar of Jamul Tiipay. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 83, 69–119.Google Scholar
Moore, Denny. 1989. Gavião Nominalizations as Relative Clauses and Sentential Complements Equivalents. International Journal of American Linguistics 55, 309–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1976. Mojave Syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1997. Versatile Nominalizations. In Essays in language function and language type, Bybee, Joan, Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd Edition, Volume 2: Complex constructions , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 52–150. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakel, Jeannette. 2004. A Grammar of Mosetén. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & bin Makhashen, Khaled A. 2009. Nominalization in Soqotri, a South Arabian language of Yemen. In Endangered languages: Contributions to Morphology and Morpho-syntax , Wetzels, W. Leo (ed.), 9–31. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina & Muysken, Pieter (eds). 2011. Subordination in Native South American Languages. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Alejandra. 2001. Pilagá Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
Weber, David J. 1983. Relativization and nominalized clauses in Huallaga (Huanaco) Quechua. University of California Publications in Linguistics 103. Berkeley and Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1989. A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánaco) Quechua. University of California Publications in Linguistics 112. Berkeley and Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Wang, Jiao. 2011. From light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of zhe and suo in Old and Middle Chinese. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, Yap, Foong-Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick (eds), 61–108. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick. 2011. Introduction. Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, Yap, Foong-Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick (eds), 1–57. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Álvarez González, Albert
2019. Chapter 7. The ‘relative’ illusion and the origin of non-subject nominalizers in Cahita (Uto-Aztecan). In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.