Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 515536
References (24)
References
Cândido, Gláucia. 2005. Construções relativas na língua shanenawa (pano). Estudos Lingüísticos 34: 575–579.Google Scholar
Cortez-Mondragón, María. 1998. Cashibo-Cacataibo. In Multilinguismo en el Perú, Inés Pozzi-Escott (ed.). Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales y Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.Google Scholar
d’Ans, Andre-Marcel. 1973. Estudio glotocronológico sobre nueve hablas pano. Lima: UNMSM.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds). 2006. Complementation: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Faust, Norma, and Eugene Loos. 2002. Gramática del idioma yaminahua. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Fleck, David. 2003. A grammar of Matses. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
. 2013. Panoan languages and linguistics. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 99.Google Scholar
INEI 2007: [URL]
Loos, Eugene. 1999. Pano. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 227–250.Google Scholar
Shell, Olive. 1965. Pano reconstruction. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
. 1975. Estudios Pano, III: Las lenguas Pano y su reconstrucción [Serie Lingüística Peruana, No. 12]. Yarinacocha: ILV.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 124], Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani & David W. Fleck (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)
. 2009. Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t. In Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], T. Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar. 2013. El sistema de concordancia del participante en las lenguas Pano y sus implicancias para el conocimiento de la Proto-Lengua. Revista Brasileria de Lingüística Antropológica 5(1): 117–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Valle, Daniel. 2014. Focus marking in Kakataibo. Oklahoma Working Papers in Indigenous Languages 1: 55–78.Google Scholar
. 2015. Modality in Kakataibo. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 19:111–137.Google Scholar
. 2017. Grammar and information structure of San Alejando Kakataibo. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Winstrand, Lila. 1968. Kashibo relative clause construction. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011a. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.
. 2011b. Aproximación dialectológica a la lengua cashibo-cacataibo. Lexis XXXV(1): 5–46.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Roberto & Fleck, David. 2012. Prefixation in Kashibo-Kakataibo: Synchronic or diachronic derivation? International Journal of American Linguistics 78: 385–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zariquiey Biondi Roberto. 2013. Tessmann’s <Nokamán>: a linguistic investigation of a mysterious Panoan group. Cadernos de Etnolingüística 5. 1-48.Google Scholar