Constructional grounding in emerging complexity
Early comp-que constructions in Spanish acquisition
Cecilia Rojas-Nieto | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de | Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas
A constructional grounding view to emerging complexity is based on the assumption that components of complex constructions may be used as free clauses before they are integrated into a complex frame. In child language development, constructional grounding has already been tested with positive results for some simple frames: passives and existential constructions. This chapter extends this view to complex sentence formation in early acquisition of Spanish. The analysis focuses on data pointing to a possible grounding relation between main clauses with lexical uses of future complement-taking verbs, and free, insubordinated clause constructions marked by comp-que. Children have access to and may learn these independent frames from parental models. Evidence of constructional grounding is presented: Chronological, distributional and functional results point to a grounding relation between free uses of these components and complex sentences that integrate them. The paper adds to synchronic and diachronic analysis of emerging complexity, and brings developmental evidence on how children integrate earlier and independently learned clausal construction frames.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Antecedents
- 2.1Constructional grounding in acquisition
- 2.2Spanish antecedents
- 3.Method
- 3.1Data selection
- 3.2Data presentation
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Overview of early complex sentences: ctv + comp-que constructions
- 4.2On verbs that will take comp-que constructions: Developing a construction inventory
- 4.3Looking at free comp-que constructions
- 4.4Development of ctv frames and comp-que constructions
- 4.5Bridging the gap. Dialogical support and on-line integration
- 5.Concluding remarks
-
Acknowledgement
-
Abbreviations
-
Notes
-
References
References
Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Behrens, Heike
2006 How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions.
Cognitive Science 30(6): 995–1026.
Aguirre, Carmen
2000 [1994] La adquisición de las categorías gramaticales del español. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Ambridge, Ben & Lieven, Elena
2011 Child Language Acquisition. Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: CUP.
Bannard, Colin, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael
2009 Modeling children’s early grammatical knowledge.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(41): 17284–17289. :
Barreña, Andoni
1994 Sobre la adquisición de la categoría funcional comp por niños vascos. In
La adquisición del vasco y del castellano en niños bilingües,
Jurgen Meisel (ed.), 231–284. Frankfurt: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.
[URL])
Barreña, Andoni
1999 La adquisición de estructuras subordinadas por un niño bilingüe vasco-español,
Lingüística para el siglo XXI. III Congreso organizado por el Departamento de Lengua Española, 277–286. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
[URL]
Bloom, Lois, Lahey, Margaret, Hood, Lois, Lifter, Karin & Fiess, Kathleen
1991[1980] Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. In
Language Development from Two to Three, Lois Bloom, 261–289. Cambridge: CUP.
Bod, Rens
2009 From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning.
Cognitive Science 33(5): 752–793.
Brandt, Silke, Verhagen, Arie, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michel
2011 German children’s productivity with simple transitive and complement-clause constructions: Testing the effects of frequency and diversity.
Cognitive Linguistics 22(2): 325–357.
Braunwald, Susan R.
1997 The development of because and so: Connecting language, thought, and social understanding. In
Processing Interclausal Relationships: Studies in the Production and Comprehension of Text,
Jean Costermans &
Michel Fayol (eds), 121–137. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J.
Coseriu, Eugenio
1976 Das Romanische Verbal system. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Culicover, Peter W.
1999 Syntactic Nuts. Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
Dąbrowska, Eva & Lieven, Elena
2005 Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions.
Cognitive Linguistics 16(3): 437–474.
Demonte, Violeta & Fernández-Soriano, Olga
2009 Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system.
Probus 21: 23–49.
Diessel, Holger
2004 The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: CUP.
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael
2000a The development of relative constructions in early child speech.
Cognitive Linguistics 11: 131–152.
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael
2000b Why complement clauses do not include a that-complementizer in early child language. In
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society,
Jeff Good &
Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 86–97. Berkeley CA: BLS.
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael
2001 The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis.
Cognitive Linguistics 12(2): 97–141.
Du Bois, John W.
2014 Towards dialogic syntax.
Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410
Elman, Jeffrey L.
1990 Finding structure in time.
Cognitive Science 14(2): 179–211. doi:
.
Elman. Jeffrey L.
1993 Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small.
Cognition 48(1): 71–99.
Elman, Jeffrey, Bates, Elizabeth, Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico & Plunkett, Kim
1996 Rethinking Innateness. A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Enfield, Nicholas J. & Sidnell, Jack
2014 Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. In
The Social Origins of Language: Studies in the Evolution of Language,
Daniel Dor,
Chris Knight &
Jerome Lewis (eds), 99–104. Oxford: OUP.
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In
Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations,
Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
2005 The Development of Dutch Connectives: Change and Acquisition as Windows on Form-Function Relations. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Sanders, Ted
2011 Discovering domains. On the acquisition of causal connectives.
Journal of Pragmatics 43(6): 1645–1662.
Ezeizabarrena Segurola, María José
1997 Infinitivos verbales en el lenguaje de niños bilingües. In
Views on the Acquisition and Use of a Second Language: Eurosla’7 Proceedings,
Lourdes Díaz &
Carmen Pérez (eds), 177–190. Barcelona: Universidad Pompeu Fabra.
Ezeizabarrena Segurola, María José
2002 Root infinitives in two pro-drop languages. In
Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax,
Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux &
Juana M. Liceras (eds), 35–65. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1988 The mechanisms of “construction grammar”.
Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 35–55.
Frank, Stefan L., Bod, Rens & Christiansen, Morten H.
2012 How hierarchical is language use? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, rspb20121741.
[URL] (24 August, 2013).
Freudenthal, Daniel, Pine, Julian & Gobet, Fernand
2010 Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of optional infinitive errors across languages: A comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model.
Journal of Child Language 37(3): 643–669.
Gast, Volker & Diessel, Holger
2012 The typology of clause linkage: Status quo, challenges, prospects. In
Clause Linkage in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Data-driven Approaches to Cross-clausal Syntax,
Volker Gast &
Holger Diessel (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gili Gaya, Samuel
1983 Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona, España: Bibliograf.
Givón, T.
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.
Givón, T.
2009 The ontogeny of complex verb phrases. In
Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution [
Typological Studies in Language 85],
T. Givón &
Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 311–387. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure
. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
Goldberg, Adele
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: OUP.
Gras, Pedro
2011 Gramática de construcciones en interacción: Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.
Gras, Pedro
2013 Entre la gramática y el discurso: Valores conectivos de que inicial átono en español. In
Autour de que/El entorno de que,
Daniel Jacob &
Katja Ploog (eds), 89–112. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007 The Genesis of Grammar. A Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.
Israel, Michael, Johnson, Christopher & Brooks, Patricia J.
2000 From states to events. The acquisition of English passive participles.
Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2): 103–129.
Johnson, Christopher
1999 Constructional Grounding: The Role of Interpretational Overlap in Lexical and Constructional Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley CA.
Johnson, Christopher
2001 Constructional grounding: On the relation between deictic and existential there-constructions in acquisition. In
Conceptual and Discourse Factors in Linguistic Structure,
Alan J. Cienki,
Barbara J. Luka &
Michael B. Smith (eds), 123–136. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Kidd, Evan, Brandt, Silke, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael
2007 Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses.
Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 860–897.
Köymen, Bahar & Kyratzis, Amy
2014 Dialogic syntax and complement constructions in toddlers’ peer interactions.
Cognitive Linguistics 25: 497–521. doi:
Kyratzis, Amy, Guo, Jiansheng & Ervin-Tripp, Susan M.
1990 Pragmatic conventions influencing children’s use of causal constructions in natural discourse.
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 16: 205–214.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In
Usage-based Models of Language,
Michael Barlow &
Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 1–63. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Lehmann, Christian
1988 Towards a typology of clause linkage. In
Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [
Typological Studies in Language 18],
John Haiman &
Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 181–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2006 On the human ‘interactional engine’. In
Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Human Interaction,
Nicholas J. Enfield &
Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 29–69. Oxford: Berg.
Lieven, Elena
2006 Producing multiword utterances. In
Constructions in Acquisition,
Eve V. Clark &
Barbara Kelly (eds), 83–110. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Lieven, Elena
2008 Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach. In
Trends in Corpus Research: Finding Structure in Data [
Trends in Language Acquisition Research 6],
Heike Behrens (ed.), 61–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lieven, Elena, Behrens, Heike, Speares, Jennifer & Tomasello, Michael
2003 Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach.
Journal of Child Language 30: 333–370.
Lieven, Elena, Salomo, Dorothé & Tomasello, Michael
2009 Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis.
Cognitive Linguistics 20(3): 481–507.
Luna-Traill, Elizabeth
1980 Sintaxis de los verboides en el habla culta de la ciudad de México. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extensión of dependency beyond the sentence.
Language 84(1): 69–119.
Montolío, Estrella
1999 ¡Si nunca he dicho que estuviera enamorada de él! Sobre construcciones independientes introducidas por si con valor replicativo.
Oralia 2: 37–70.
Moreno de Alba, José G.
1978 Valores de las formas verbales en el español de México. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Newport, Elissa L.
1990 Maturation constraints on language learning.
Cognitive Science 14: 11–28.
Ninio, Anat
2001 Pragmatic keywords and first combining verbs.
First Language 21(3): 433–460.
Ochs, Elinor, Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Platt, Martha L.
1979 Propositions across utterances and speakers. In
Developmental Pragmatics,
Elinor Ochs &
Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 251–268. New York NY: Academic Press.
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A.
(eds)
1996 Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
Pons Bordería, Salvador
2003
Que inicial átono como marca de modalidad.
Estudios de Lingüística 17: 531–545.
Porroche Ballesteros, Margarita
2000 Algunos aspectos del uso de que en el español conversacional (que como introductor de oraciones ‘independientes’).
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 3.
[URL] (15 August 2013).
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María
2008 Estudio sintáctico y discursivo de algunas estructuras enunciativas y citativas del español.
Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 21: 269–288.
Rojas-Nieto, Cecilia
1992 La pregunta en la construcción del diálogo: Funciones constructivas de las preguntas a los niños pequeños.
Revista de Lingüística Aplicada 15-16: 182–198.
Rojas-Nieto, Cecilia
2003 Early acquisition of verb inflexion in Spanish. A usage-based account.
Psychology of Language and Communication 7(2): 33–56.
Rojas-Nieto, Cecilia
2007 La base de datos ETAL: Etapas tempranas en la adquisición del lenguaje. Origen, descripción y metas de un proyecto.
Jornadas Filológicas 2005. 575–599. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Sansiñena, María Sol
2015 The Multiple Functional Load of que. An Interactional Approach to Insubordinate Complement Clauses in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Catholic University Leuven.
Sansiñena, María Sol, De Smet, Hendrick & Cornillie, Bert
2015 Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses.
Journal of Pragmatics 7: 3–19. <
>
Serrat, Elisabet & Aparici, Melina
2001 Morphological errors in early language acquisition: Evidence from Catalan and Spanish. In
Research on Child Language Acquisition,
Margareta Almgrem,
Andoni Barreña, Ma.
José Ezeizabarrena,
Itziar Idiazábal &
Brian MacWhinney (eds), 1260–1277. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Sheridan, Guillermo
2007 Quijote furioso.
Paralelos y Meridianos, 11–33. México: Pértiga.
Slobin, Dan I.
1985 Why study language crosslinguistically? In
The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1:
The Data,
Dan I. Slobin (ed.), 3–24. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tomasello, Michael
1992 First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: CUP.
Tomasello, Michael
2000 The item based nature of children's early syntactic development.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 156–163.
Tomasello, Michael
2003 Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Child Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, Michael
2006 Acquiring linguistic constructions. In
Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 2:
Cognition, Perception and Language,
William Damon,
Richard M. Learner,
Deanna Kuhn,
Robert Siegler (eds), 255–298. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Tomasello, Michael
2008 Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Van Veen, Rosie, Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline, Sanders, Ted & Van Den Bergh, Huub
2009 Parental input and connective acquisition: Growth curve analysis.
First Language 29: 266–288.
Van Veen, Rosie, Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline, Sanders, Ted & Van Den Bergh, Huub
2013 The influence of input on connective acquisition: A growth curve analysis of English because and German weil
.
Journal of Child Language 40: 1003–1031. DOI:
Varela Cortés, Vianey
2006 Interacción y diálogo en la adquisición de las construcciones introducidas por pero
. MA dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Varela Cortés, Vianey
2011 El nicho discursivo de las construcciones con pero en la adquisición temprana del español. In
Interacción y uso lingüístico en el desarrollo de la lengua materna,
Cecilia Rojas-Nieto &
Donna Jackson-Maldonado (eds), 173–208. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.