The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity

Typology, history, syntax and semantics

| The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027204783 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027261687 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
This book provides a comprehensive treatment of the syntax and semantics of a single linguistic phenomenon – the NP-strategy for expressing reciprocity – in synchronic, diachronic, and typological perspectives. It challenges the assumption common in the typological, syntactic, and semantic literature, namely that so-called reciprocal constructions encode symmetric relations. Instead, they are analyzed as constructions encoding unspecified relations. In effect, it provides a new proposal for the truth-conditional semantics of these constructions. More broadly, this book introduces new ways of bringing together historical linguistics and formal semantics, demonstrating how, on the one hand, the inclusion of historical data concerning the sources of reciprocal constructions enriches their synchronic analysis; and how, on the other hand, an analysis of the syntax and the semantics of these constructions serves as a key for understanding their historical origins.
[Typological Studies in Language, 127]  2020.  xv, 291 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Symbols and abbreviations
xi
Acknowledgments
xiii–xv
Introduction
Part 1
33–92
Chapter 1. The types of constructions and their origin
33–59
Chapter 2. The diachronic development from a two-unit to a one-unit construction
61–92
Part 2
95–195
Chapter 3. Relics as a syntactic category: Modern Hebrew and Italian constructions as frozen formulae
95–111
Chapter 4. Heterogeneity: Languages with more than one NP-Strategy construction
113–149
Chapter 5. Changing meaning of the NP-strategy constructions
151–182
Chapter 6. A comparative linguistics study of NP-strategy constructions
183–195
Part 3
199–263
Chapter 7. The basic meaning of the NP-strategy for expressing reciprocity
199–238
Chapter 8. Specifying the meaning of the NP-strategy through context
239–263
References
265–283
Language index
285–287
Subject index
289–291
References

References

Aissen, Judith
1982Valence and coreference. In Studies in Transitivity [Syntax and Semantics 15], Hopper Paul & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 7–33. New York NY: Academic Press.
Alexander, Philip S.
1999The Society of Biblibal Literature Handbook of Style for Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Early Christian Studies. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Doron, Edit & Heycock, Caroline
2004Broad subjects and clitic left dislocation. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 59], David Adger, Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 329–358. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Amsterdamska, Olga
1987Schools of Thought: The Development of Linguistics from Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: Reidel. Crossref link
Andersen, Henning
1987From auxiliary to desinence. In Historical Development of Auxiliaries, Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Aoun, Joseph, Elabbas, Benmamoun & Sportiche, Dominique
1999Further remarks on first conjunct agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 669–681. Crossref link
Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Asr, Fatemeh Torabi & Demberg, Vera
2012Implicitness of discourse relations. In Proceedings of COLING 2012, Martin Kay & Christian Boitet (eds), 2669–2684. Mumbai: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.
Atlas, Jay D.
1996‘Only’ noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items and monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13: 265–328. Crossref link
Avanzi, Mathieu, Gendrot, Cédric & Lacheret, Anne
2010Is there a prosodic difference between left-dislocated and heavy subjects? Evidence from spontaneous speech. In Every Language, Every Style, Speech Prosody, 5th International Conference, Chicago IL, 10–14 May, 20–30. http://​www​.isca​-speech​.org​/sp2010​/ITRW
Avinery, Isaac
1964Yad ha-lashon: otsar leshoni be-seder alef-bet shel ha-nośʾim (Yad ha-lashon: Language Treasures Arranged in Alphabetical Order). Tel Aviv: Yizreʻel.
Bahat, Yaʻacov & Ron, Mordekhai
1980Ṿe-dayeḳ: tiḳune lashon ve-shipur ha-signon (Be Precise: Language Amendments and Style Improvement). Mahad. 2, meḥuseshet. 2th ed.
Baldi, Philip
1975Reciprocal verbs and symmetric predicates. Linguistische Berichte 36: 13–20.
Baraḳ, Semadar & Gadish, Ronit
2008Safah ḳamah: leḳeṭ mi-tokh ha-mador Leshonenu la-ʻam ʻiton ha-Arets 1932–1944 (A Rising Language: Safa qama: selections from the Leshonenu La-am column Haretz, 1932–1944) [Asupot u-mevo’ot ba-lashon Vol. 7]. Jerusalem: ha-Aḳademyah la-lashon ha-ʻIvrit.
Bar-Asher, Elitzur
2008The origin and the typology of the pattern qtil li in Syriac and Babylonian Aramaic. In Sha’arey Lashon: Studies in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Jewish Languages in Honor of Moshe Bar-Asher, Vol. II, Aharon Mamman, Steven Fassberg & Yochanan Breuer (eds), 360–392. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.
2009A Theory of Argument Realization and its Applications to Features of the Semitic Languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
2009bThe imperative forms of Proto Semitic and a new perspective on Barth’s Law. Journal of American Oriental Society 128: 233–255.
Bar-Asher, Moshe
2004The language of Qumran: Between biblical and mishnaic Hebrew (a study in morphology). Meghillot: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls 2: 137–149
2006Mishnaic Hebrew: An introductory survey. In The Literature of the Sages, Second Part, Michael Edward Stone & Shmuel Safrai (eds), 567–595. Amsterdam: Royal Van Gorcum & Philadelphia PA: Fortress Pres Fefrerg.
2012Studies in Modern Hebrew. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language.
2014Studies in Classical Hebrew. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur
2011aNotes on reciprocal constructions in Akkadian in light of typological and historical considerations. Semitica et Classica 4: 23–42. Crossref link
2011bFrom typology to diachrony: Synchronic and diachronic aspects of predicative possessive constructions in Akkadian. Folia Linguistica Historica 32: 43–88
2012Diachronic syntactic studies in Hebrew pronominal reciprocal constructions. In Diachrony in Biblical Hebrew, Cynthia Miller & Ziony Zevit (eds), 209–244. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.
2014aFrom a non-argument-dative to an argument-dative: The character and origin of the qṭīl lī construction in Syriac and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. Folia Orientalia 51: 59–111.
2014bReciprocal NP-strategies in Jewish dialects of Near Eastern Neo-Aramaic in light of parallel Semitic constructions. Journal of Jewish languages 2: 49–77. Crossref link
2015Hebrew language. Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception, Vol. 11, 637–639; 646–665. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2015aArguments in favor of an ambiguist approach. Paper presented at the Göttingen Workshop on Negation and Polarity, September.
2015bThe case for external sentential negation: Evidence from Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. Linguistics 53: 1031–1078. Crossref link
2016aIntroduction to the Grammar of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic, 2nd, revised and extended edn. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
2016bThe Semitic templates from the perspective of reciprocal predicates. In Proceedings of the 10th Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 2010, 16–30, 7–10 September, Haifa. http://​mmm​.lis​.upatras​.gr​/index​.php​/mmm​/article​/view​/2721​/2984
2017The pursuit of science: A study in Saussure’s philosophy of science through the lens of a historical discussion. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 27: 253–290.
2019Formal characterizations of bridging contexts". Ms. a paer presented at the conference Formal Diachronic Semantics 4, The Ohio State University, November 2019.
Bar-Lev, Moshe Elyashiv
2018Free Choice, Homogeneity, and Innocent Inclusion. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Bar-Lev, Moshe E. & Margulis, Daniel
2014Hebrew kol: A universal quantifier as an undercover existential. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18, Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Fălăus, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds), 60–76. https://​semanticsarchive​.net​/sub2013​/ProceedingsSuB18​.pdf
Bary, Corien L.
2009Aspect in Ancient Greek a Semantic Analysis of the Aorist and Imperfective. Nijmegen: Radboud University.
Bassi, Itai & Bar-Lev, Moshe Elyashiv
2016A unified existential semantics for bare conditionals. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21, Robert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern & Hannah Rohde (eds), 22–25. https://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/DRjNjViN​/index​.html
Beck, Sigrid
2001Reciprocals are definites. Natural Language Semantics 9: 69–138. Crossref link
Beck, Sigrid & von Stechow, Arnim
2006Dog after dog revisited. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10, Christian Ebert & Cornelia Endriss (eds), 43–54. http://​www​.sfs​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/~cebert​/papers​/SuB10Proceedings​.pdf
Beck, Sigrid & Gergel, Remus
2015The diachronic semantics of English AGAIN. Natural Language Semantics 23: 157–203. Crossref link
Belletti, Adriana
1982On the anaphoric status of the reciprocal constructions in Italian. The Linguistic Review 2: 101–138. Crossref link
Benmamoun, Elabbas, Archna, Bhatia & Polinsky, Maria
2010Closest conjunct agreement in head-final languages. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2009: 67–88. Crossref link
Bhat, Shankara D. N.
1978Pronominalization. Pune: Deccan College.
Bhatt, Rajesh
2005Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 757–807. Crossref link
Bhatt, Rajesh & Walkow, Martin
2013Locating agreement in grammar: An argument from agreement in conjunctions. Natural language and Linguistic Theory 31: 951–1013. Crossref link
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2008Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-theory: Phi Features Across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.
Bock, Kathryn, Butterfield, Sally, Cutler, Anne, Cutting, J. Cooper, Eberhard, Kathleen M. & Humphreys, Karin R.
2006Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively. Language 82: 64–113. Crossref link
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1987‘Each other’ and its friends. Another Indiana University Linguistics Club Twentieth Anniversary Volume, 1–36. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics club.
Bosch, Peter, Katz, Graham & Umbach, Carla
2007The non-subject bias of German. Anaphors. In Text: Cognitive, formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten & Mareile Knees (eds), 145–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Bošković, Željko
2009Unifying first- and last-conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 455–496. Crossref link
Boyarin, Daniel
1981An inquiry into the formation of the Middle Aramaic dialects. In Bono Homini Donum: Essays in Historical Linguistics in Memory of J. Alexander Kerns [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 16], Yoël L. Arbeitman (ed.), 613–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Brame, Michael K.
1977Alternatives to the tensed and specified subject conditions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 381–411. Crossref link
Brisson, Christine
1998Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Buccellati, Giorgio
1996A Structural Grammar of Babylonian. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Bybee, Joan
2003Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (ed.), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cable, Seth
2014Reflexives, reciprocals and contrast. Journal of Semantics 31: 1–41. Crossref link
Campbell, Lyle
2001What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–161. Crossref link
Cantarino, Vicente
1975Syntax of Modern Arabic Prose, Vol. III. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Caramazza, Alfonso, Grober, Ellen H., Garvey, Caterine F. & Yates, Jack
1977Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 16: 601–609. Crossref link
Caudal, Parick
2015The passé composé in Old French and Modern French: Evolution or revolution? In Sentence and Discourse, Jacqueline Guéron (ed.), 178–204. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976Givenness, contastiveness, definitness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–55. New York NY: Academic Press.
Choi, Jongtae
1994The Aramaic of Daniel: Its Date, Place of Composition and Linguistic Comparison with Extra-Biblical Texts. PhD dissertation, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield IL.
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of The Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1973Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York NY: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
1981Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
1986Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York NY: Praeger.
Coghill, Eleanor
2016Rise and Fall of Ergativity in Aramaic: Cycles of Alignment Change. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Condoravdi, Cleo & Deo, Ashwini
2014Aspect shifts in Indo-Aryan and trajectories of semantic change. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 261–292. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cook, Edward M.
1994A new perspective on the language of Onkelos and Jonathan. In The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context, Derek R. G. Beattie & Martin J. McNamara (eds), 142–156. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Corbett, Greville
2006Agreement [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP.
Dalman, Gustaf
1905Grammatik des Jüdisch-Palästinischen Aramäisch: Nach Den Idiomen des Palästinischen Talmud, des Onkelostargum und Prophetentargum und der Jerusalemischen Targume. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs Buchhandlung.
Dalrymple, Mary, McHombo, Sam A. & Peters, Stanley
1994Semantic similarities and syntactic contrasts between Chicheŵa and English reciprocals. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 145–163.
Dalrymple, Mary, Kanazawa, Makoto, Kim, Yookyung, Mchombo, Sam & Peters, Stanley
1998Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–220. Crossref link
Davidson, Donald
1967aThe Logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
1967b, Causal relations. Journal of Philosophy 64: 691–703. Crossref link
1970Mental events. In Experience and Theory, Lawrence Foster & Joe W. Swanson (eds), 79–102. London: Duckworth.
Delitzsch Friedrich
1889Assyrian Grammar with Paradigms, Exercises, Glossary and Bibliography. Berlin: H. Reuther.
Deo, Ashwini
2009Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics & Philosophy 32: 475–521. Crossref link
2014Formal semantics/pragmatics and language change. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 393–409. Routledge: Oxford.
2015Diachronic semantics. Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 179–197. Crossref link
De Smet, Hendrick
2009Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119: 1728–1755. Crossref link
De Smet
2014Does innovation need reanalysis? In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 69], Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds), 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
den Dikken, Marcel
2001Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2012Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: ??, ?? Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.
Doron, Edit
2016Introduction. In Language Contact and the Development of Modern Hebrew, 1–22. Leiden: Brill.
Doron, Edit & Heycock, Caroline
1999Filling and licensing multiple specifiers. In Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches, David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Bernadette Plunkett & George Tsoulas (eds), 69–89. Oxford: OUP.
2010In support of broad subjects in Hebrew. Lingua 120: 1764–1776. Crossref link
Doron, Edit & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2009A unified approach to reflexivization in Semitic and Romance. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 75–105. Crossref link
Dougherty, Ray C.
1970A grammar of coordinate conjoined structures, Part I. Language 46: 850–98. Crossref link
Dougherty, Ray C.
1974The syntax and semantics of each other constructions. Foundations of Language 12: 1–47.
Driver, Godfrey R.
1925Grammar of the Colloquial Arabic of Syria and Palestine. London: Probsthain & Co.
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
2010Grammaticalization and semantic reanalysis. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2675–2702. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2011Grammaticalization and Semantic Change. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Handbook of Grammaticalization, pp. 389–400. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew
2015Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic. Diachronica 32: 186- 230. Crossref link
Elbourne, Paul
1999Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. In The North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 29, Nancy Hall, Masako Hirotani & Pius Tamanji (eds), 81–92. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Enfield, Nick J.
2011Descriptions of reciprocal situation in Lao. In Evans et al. (eds), 129–147.
Erades, Peter A.
1950Points of modern English Syntax XII. English Studies 31: 153–157. Crossref link
Evans, Nicholas
2008Reciprocal constructions: Towards a structural typology. In König & Gast (eds), 33–103.
Evans, Nicholas, Gaby, Alice & Nordlinger, Rachel
2007Valency mismatches and the coding of reciprocity in Australian languages. Linguistic Typology 11: 541–597. Crossref link
Evans, Nicholas, Gaby, Alice, Levinson, Stephen C. & Majid, Asifa
(eds) 2011aReciprocals and Semantic Typology [Typological Studies in Languages 98]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011bIntroduction: Reciprocals and semantic typology. In Evans et al. (eds), 1–28. Crossref link
Everaert, Martin
1990–1Nominative anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or syntax? In Issues in Germanic Syntax, Werner Abraham, Wim Kosmeijer & Eric Reuland (eds), 277–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
1999Types of anaphoric expressions: Reflexives and reciprocals. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), Vol.2, 63–83.
2008Domain restrictions on reciprocal interpretation. In König & Volker (eds), 557–576.
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine
2001“Wi(e)der” and “Again(st)”, In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 101–130. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fassberg, Steven
1990Grammar of the Palestinian Targum Fragments from the Cairo Genizah. Atlanta GA: Scholars Press.
2010The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Challa. Leiden: Brill. Crossref link
Fiengo, Robert & Lasnik, Howard
1973The logical structure of reciprocal sentences in English. Foundations of Language 9: 447–468.
Filip, Hana & Carlson, Gregory N.
2001Distributivity strengthens reciprocity, collectivity weakens it. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 417–466. Crossref link
von Fintel, Kai
1995The formal semantics of grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 2, Jill N. Beckman (ed.), 175–198. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts, Department of Linguistics.
2000Whatever. Semantics and Linguistics Theory 10: 27–39. Crossref link
2008What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22: 137–170. Crossref link
Fitzmyer, Joseph A.
1979The phases of the Aramaic language. In A Wandering Aramean, 57–84. Chico CA: Scholars Press.
Fox, Danny
2007Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, Penka Stateva & Uli Sauerland (eds), 71–120. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Crossref link
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1999Coding of the reciprocal function: Two solutions. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 179–194.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Walker, Traci
(eds) 1999Reciprocals: Form and Function, 2 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 40–41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Walker, Traci originally published as Curl, Traci)
Frazer, Mary
2017Commentary on therapeutic (Qutāru). Cuneiform Commentaries Project, Eckhart Frahm, Enrique Jiménez, Mary Frazer & Klaus Wagensonner, 2013–2018. https://​ccp​.yale​.edu​/P296515. DOI: 10079/v41nsdr> (7 march 2018).
Gaby, Alice
2008Distinguishing reciprocals from reflexives in Kuuk Thaayorre. In König & Gast (eds), 259–288.
Gelb, Ignace J.
1957Notes on Von Soden’s grammar of Akkadian. Bibliotheca Orientalis 12: 93–111.
Gelb, Ignace J., Benno. Landsberger
, et al. 1956The Assyrian Dictionary. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.
van Gelderen, Elly
2011The linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Geller, Markham J.
2010Ancient Babylonian Medicine: Theory and Practice. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Gendler Szabó, Zoltán
2000Problems of Compositionality [PhD Dissertations]. New York NY: Garland.
2001Adjectives in context. In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 90], István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds), 119 -146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gillon, Brendan S.
1987The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 199–219. Crossref link
Givón, T.
2015The Diachrony of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gleitman, Lila R.
1965Coordinating conjunctions in English. Language 41: 260–293. Crossref link
Glinert, Lewis
1983The reciprocal structure in Modern Hebrew. In David Gross Anniversary Volume, Kodesh Shlomo (ed.), 196–213. Jerusalem: Hamatmind. (in Hebrew)
1989The Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: CUP.
Goldenberg, Gideon
1991‘Onself’, ‘one’s own’ and ‘one another’ in Amharic. In Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, Alan S. Kaye. (ed.), 531–549. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Greenblatt, Jared R.
2011The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Amadya. Leiden: Brill.
Grice, Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds). New York NY: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Grice, Paul 1989 Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.)
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin
1984Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Haas, Florian
2010Reciprocity in English: Historical Development and Synchronic Structure. London: Routledge.
Häberl, Charles G.
2009Neo-Mandaic dialect of Khorramshahr. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Haberlandt, Karl & Bingham, Geoffrey
1978Verbs contribute to the coherence of brief narratives: Reading related and unrelated sentence triples. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17: 419–425. Crossref link
Hacquard, Valentine
2010On the event relativity of modal auxiliaries. Natural Language Semantics 18: 79–114. Crossref link
Halevy, Rivka
2010Reciprocal constructions in Hebrew. In Judaic Studies in Memory of Moriah Liebson, Maman Ahron & Rivka Bliboim (eds), 265–286. Jerusalem: Hebrew University. (in Hebrew)
2011aThe grammaticalization of bipartite reciprocal markers in Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 52: 7–18. Crossref link
2011bReciprocal constructions between syntax and lexicon. Leshonenu 73: 401–422. (in Hebrew)
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.
1999Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1043–1068. Crossref link
2004On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2007Further remarks on reciprocal constructions. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 2087–2115.
Hasselbach, Rebecca
2007External plural markers in Semitic: A new assessment. In Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic Linguistics Presented to Gene B. Gragg [SAOC 60], Cynthia L. Miller (ed.), 123–138. Chicago IL: The Oriental Institute.
Hecker, Karl
1968Grammatik der Kültepe-Texte [Analecta Orientalia 44]. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.
Heim, Irene, Lasnik, Howard & May, Robert
1991Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 63–101.
Heine, Bernd
1994Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 235–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
1999, Polysemy involving reflexive and reciprocal markers in African languages. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), Vol.2, 1–30.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd & Miyashita, Hiroyuki
2008The intersection between reflexives and reciprocals: A grammaticalization perspective. In König & Gast (eds), 169–2232.
Hetzron, Robert
1972Ethiopian Semitic: Studies in Classification. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
1974La division des langues sémitiques. Actes du premier congrès international de linguistique sémitique et chamito-sémitque, Paris 16–19 juillet, 1969, André Caquot & David Cohen (eds), 181–194. The Hague: Mouton. Crossref link
1975Genetic classification and Ethiopian Semitic. In Hamito-Semitica, James Bynon & Theodora Bynon (eds), 103–27. The Hague: Mouton. Crossref link
1976Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 38: 89–108. Crossref link
Heycock, Caroline
1993Syntactic predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2: 167–211. Crossref link
Heycock, Caroline & Doron, Edit
2003Categorical subjects. Gengo Kenkyu 123: 95–135.
Hicks, Glyn
2009The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 139]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Higginbotham, James
1981Reciprocal interpretation. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 97–117.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization?: A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hinterwimmer, Stefan
2015A unified account of the properties of German demonstrative pronouns. In The Proceedings of the Workshop on Pronominal Semantics at NELS 40, Patrick Grosz, Pritty Patel-Grosz & Igor Yanovich (eds), 61–107. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Hirsch, Hans
1963Die Inschriften der Könige von Agade. Archiv für Orientforschung 20: 1–82.
Hobbs, Jerry R.
1979Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3: 67–90. Crossref link
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Horn, Lawrence
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context [GURT 1984], Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
1989A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
1996Exclusive company: ‘Only’ and the dynamics of vertical inference. Journal of Semantics 13: 1–40. Crossref link
Huehnergard, John & Rubin, Aaron
2011Phyla and waves: Models of classification. Semitic languages. In Semitic Lanuages: An International Handbook, Stefan Weninger, Geoffrey Khan, Michael P. Streck & Janet Watson (eds), 259‐278. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Crossref link
Hurst, Peter & Nordlinger, Rachel
2011Reciprocal constructions in English: Each other and beyond. In Evans et al. (eds), 75–89.
Inglese, Guglielmo
2017A synchronic and diachronic typology of Hittite reciprocal constructions. Studies in Language 41: 956–1006. Crossref link
Janda, Richard D.
2001Beyond ‘pathways’ and ‘unidirectionality’: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 265–340. Crossref link
Jankowsky, Kurt R.
1972The Neogrammarians: a re-evaluation of their place in the development of linguistic science. (Janua Linguarum, series minor, 116.) The Hague: Mouton.
Jastrow, Otto
1988Der neuaramäische Dialekt von Hertevin (Provinz Siirt). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Jay, Jonathan
2009Reciprocal constructions in Biblical Hebrew. GIALens: Electronic Notes Series 3(1). https://​www​.diu​.edu​/documents​/gialens​/Vol3​-1​/Jay​-HebrewReciprocals​.pdf
Jespersen, Otto
1949[1913]A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part II, Vol. 1. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Joseph, Brian D.
2001Is there such a thing as “grammaticalization?” Language Sciences 23: 163–186. Crossref link
2005How accommodating of change is grammaticalization? The case of ‘lateral shifts’. Logos and Language 6: 1–7.
Joüon, Paul & Muraoka, Takamitsu
1991A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
1993From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kański, Zbigniew
1987Logical symmetry and natural language reciprocals. In Proceedings of the 1987 Debrecen Symposium on Logic and Language, 49–68. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Karttunen, Lauri
1974Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–193. Crossref link
Kaufman, Stephen A.
2013Targum pseudo-Jonathan and late Jewish literary Aramaic. Aramaic Studies 11: 1–26. Crossref link
Keenan, Janice M., Baillet, Susan D. & Brown, Polly
1984The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 232: 115–126. Crossref link
Kehler, Andrew, Kertz, Laura, Rohde, Hannah & Elman, Jeffrey L.
2008Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics 25: 1–44. Crossref link
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The Middle Voice: A Typological and Diachronic Study [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Khan, Geoffrey
1999A Grammar of Neo-Aramaic: The Sialect of the Jews of Arbel. Boston MA: Brill. Crossref link
2002The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Qaraqosh. Leiden: Brill. Crossref link
2004The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Sulemaniyya and Ḥalabja. Leiden: Brill. Crossref link
2008aThe expression of definiteness in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. In Aramaic in its Historical Setting, Holger Gzella & Margaretha L. Folmer (eds), 209–226. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
2008bThe Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Barwar. Leiden: Brill. Crossref link
2016Left dislocation in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 50: 91–110. Crossref link
Kim, Yooking & Peters, Stanley
1998Semantic and pragmatic context-dependence: The case ofreciprocals. In Barbosa, is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, Danny Fox Pilar, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis & David Pesetsky (eds), 221–248. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kiparsky, Paul & Condoravdi, Cleo
2006Tracking Jespersen’s cycle. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph & Angela Ralli (eds), 172–197. Mytilene: Doukas.
Kjellmer, Goran
1982Each other and one another: On the use of the English reciprocal pronouns. English Studies 63: 231–254. Crossref link
Knjazev, Jurij P.
1998Towards a typology of grammatical polysemy: Reflexive markers as markers of reciprocity. In Typology of Verbal Categories, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 185–93. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
2007Reciprocal constructions in Russian. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 673–708. Crossref link
König, Ekkehard
2011Reciprocals and semantic typology: Some concluding remarks. In Evans et al. (eds), 327–339.
König, Ekkehard & Shigehiro Kokutani
2006Towards a typology of reciprocal constructions: Focus on German and Japanese. Linguistics 44: 271–302. Crossref link
König, Ekkehard & Gast, Volker
(eds) 2008Reciprocals and Reflexives – Theoretical and Cross-linguistic Explorations [Trends in Linguistics 192]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2008aReciprocity and reflexivity – description, typology and theory. In König & Gast (eds), 1–31.
Koster, Jan
1987Domains and Dynasties: The Radical Autonomy of Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. Crossref link
Kouwenberg, Norbertus J. C.
1997Gemination in the Akkadian Verb [Studia Semitica Neerlandica 32]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Kratzer, Angelika
1981The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds and Contexts, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
1991Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kremers, Joost
1997How Arabs Speak to Each Other about Themselves: A Study of nafs and baʿḍ in Modern Standard Arabic. MA thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Krifka, Manfred
1996Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 6: 136–153. Crossref link
Križ, Manuel
2015Aspects of Homogeneity in the Semantics of Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.
2016Homogeneity, non-maximality, and all. Journal of Semantics 33: 1–47. Crossref link
Kropotkin, Pëtr
1902Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. London: Heinemann
Kruspe, Nicole
2011Reciprocal constructions in Mah Meri. In Evans et al. (eds), 149–162.
Kulikov, Leonid
2007Reciprocal constructions in Vedic. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 709–738.
Kuno, Susumu
1973The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kuperberg, Gina R., Paczynski, Martin & Ditman, Tali
2011Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 1230–1246. Crossref link
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1986Movement of noun phrases in Japanese. In Issues in Japanese Linguistics, Takashi Imai & Mamoru Saito (eds), 229–272. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1975[1965]The evolution of grammatical categories. In Esquisses linguistiques II, Jerzy Kuryłowicz (ed.), 38–54. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Kutscher, Edward Yechezkel
1971Aramaic. In Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 3, 259–287. New York NY: The Macmillan Company.
1977Aramaic, Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa ]Current Trends in Linguistics 6[, 347–412. The Hague: Mouton. (=Kutscher E.Y. Hebrew and Aramaic Studies, Jerusalem 1977, 90–155.)
Kuular, Klara B.
2007Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assistives in Tuvan. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 1163–1229.
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lakoff, George & Peter, Stanley
1966Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. In Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation Report [NSF-27], VI/1–49. Cambridge MA: Harvard Computation Laboratory (reprinted in Modern Studies in English, David Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds), 113–142. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall 1969.)
Landau, Idan
2006Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)‐fronting. Syntax 9: 32–66. Crossref link
Langacker, Ronald W.
1977Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed), 57–139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Langendoen, D. Terence
1978The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 177–197.
Lasersohn, Peter Nathan
2012Contextualism and compositionality. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 171–189. Crossref link
Lebeaux, David
1983A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 723–728.
Lee, Yo-Seob
2016Description of the BH lexeme el: A Cognitive Approach. MA thesis, Stellenbosch University.
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.
Leslau, Wolf
2000Introductory Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.
Levin, Magnus
2001Agreement with collective nouns in English [Lund Studies in English 103]. Lund: Lund University Press.
2006Collective nouns and language change. English Language and Linguistics 10: 321–343. Crossref link
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lewis, David
1973Causation. Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–567. Crossref link
1979Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. Crossref link
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1977A Mechanism of the development of copula morphemes. In Mechanism of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 419–444. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1985Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5: 19–41. Crossref link
1994Reflexives and reciprocals. In The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 7, edited by R. E. Asher (editor-in-chief), 3504–3509. Oxford: Pergam
1999Reciprocals without reflexive. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 31–62.
Lightfoot, David
1999The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
2006How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Macdonell, Arthur. A.
1927A Sanskrit Grammar for Students. Oxford: OUP.
Maclean, Arthur John
1895Grammar of the Dialects of Vernacular Syriac as Spoken by the Eastern Syrians of Kurdistan, North-West Persia, and the Plain of Mosul with Notices of the Vernacular of the Jews of Azerbaijan and of Zakhu Near Mosul. Cambridge: CUP.
Macuch, Rudolf
1965Handbook of Classical and Modern Mandaic. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
Magri, Giorgio
2014An account for the homogeneity effects triggered by plural definites and conjunction based on double strengthening. In Pragmatics, Semantics and the Case of Scalar Implicatures, Salvatore Pistoia Reda (ed.), 99–145. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Majid, Asifa, Evans, Nicholas & Gaby, Alice
2011The semantics of reciprocal constructions across languages: A extensional approach. In Evans et al. (eds), 29–59.
Malamud, Sophia A.
2012The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–58. Crossref link
Mann, Willianm C. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1986Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57–90. Crossref link
Marušič, Franc, Nevins, Andrew & Badecker, Bill
2015The grammars of conjunction agreement in Slovenian. Syntax 18: 39–77. Crossref link
Maslova, Elena
1999Reciprocals and set construal. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 161–178.
2007Reciprocal and polyadic (remarkable reciprocals in Bantu). In Nedjalkov (ed.), 335–352.
2008Reflexive encoding of reciprocity: Cross-linguistic and language-internal variation. In König & Gast (eds), 225–257.
Mari, Alda
2014Each other, asymmetry and reasonable futures. Journal of Semantics 31: 209–261. Crossref link
Mathesius, Vilém
1928On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English. In Acted du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à La Haye, 56–63. Leiden: W.A. Sijthoff.
Maul, Stefan M.
2009Die Lesung der Rubra dù.dù.bi und kìd.kìd.bi. Orientalia NS 78: 69–80.
McDaniels, Todd
2003What’s wrong with reanalysis? Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 81–88.
McGregor, William B.
1999Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. In Frajzyngier & Walker (eds), 85–122.
Méndez Dosuna, Julián
1997Fusion, fission and relevance in language change: De-univerbation in Greek morphology. Studies in Language 21: 577–612. Crossref link
Merin, Artur
2003Formal Semantic Theory and Diachronic Data: A Case Study in Grammaticalization [Arbeitsbericht des Sonderforschungsbereich 340. No. 75). Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart. http://​www​.semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/jhjZDgzY​/fstadd​.pdf
de Meyer, Leon
1962L’accadien des Contrats de Suse. Leiden: Brill.
Montague, Richard
1970Universal grammar. Theoria 36: 373–398. Crossref link
Mor, Uri
2015Judean Hebrew: the language of the Hebrew documents from Judea between the first and the second revolts. Jerusalem: The Academy of The Hebrew Language.
Morag, Shelomo
1988Vocalised Talmudic Manuscripts in the Cambridge Genizah Collections, Vol. I. Cambridge: CUP.
Moshkovitz, Yechiel T.
1985Sēfer Yəḥezkēl: Daʽat Mikrâ. Jerusalem: The Rabbi Kook Institution Publishers.
Munn, Alan
1999First-conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 643–668. Crossref link
Muraoka, Takamitsu
2011A Grammar of Qumran Aramaic [Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement Series 38]. Leuven: Peeters.
Murray, John D.
1997Logical connectives and local coherence. In Sources of Coherence in Reading, Robert F. Lorch & Edward J. O’Brien (eds), 107–125. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Murray, Sarah
2008Reflexivity and reciprocity with(out) underspecification. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Alte Grøn (ed.), 455–469. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Mutzafi, Hezy
2004The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Koy Sanjaq (Iraqi Kurdistan). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
2008The Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Betanure (province of Dihok). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
2011Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
(ed.) 2007Reciprocal Constructions, 5 Vols [Typological Studies in Language 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2007aOverview of the research: Definitions of terms, framework, and related issues. In Nedjalkov (ed.) 3–114.
2007bEncoding of the reciprocal meaning. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 147–208.
2007cPolysemy of reciprocal markers. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 251–333.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Geniušienė, Emma Š.
2007Questionnaire on reciprocals. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 379–434.
Nedjalkov, Igor & Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
2007aReciprocal, sociative and competitive constructions in Karachay-Balkar. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 969–1019. Crossref link
Nedjalkov, Igor & Nedjalkov, Vladimir
2007b Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assistives in Yakut". In Nedjalkov (ed.), 1095–1161.
Neishtadt, Mila
2015The lexical component in the Aramaic substrate of Palestinian Arabic. In Semitic Languages in Contact, Aaron Michael Butts (ed.), 280–310. Leiden: Brill. Crossref link
Newmeyer, Frederick
2001Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 187–229. Crossref link
Nöldeke, Thodore
1875Mandäische Grammatik. Halle: Waisenhaus.
2001Compendious Syriac Grammar, transl. by Peter T. Daniels. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Partridge, Eric
1957Usage and Abusage, 5th edn. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Perlmutter, David M.
1972A note on syntactic and semantic number in English. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 243–246.
Philip, Willian
2000Adult and child understanding of simple reciprocal sentences. Language 76: 1–27. Crossref link
Pietroski, Paul M.
2015Framing events variables. Erkenntnis 80: 31–60. Crossref link
Plank, Frans
2008Thoughts on the origin, progress, and pronominal status of reciprocal forms in Germanic, occasioned by those of Bavarian. In König & Gast (eds), 347–373.
Poesio, Massimo
1994Ambiguity, underspecification, and discourse interpretation. In International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Harry Bunt, Reinhard Muskens & Gerrit Rentier (eds), 151–160. Tilburg: University of Tilburg.
Poortman, Eva B., Struiksma, Martin E., Kerem, Nir, Friedmann, Naama & Winter, Yoad
2018Reciprocal expressions and the maximal typicality hypothesis. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3: 1–30. Crossref link
Potter, Simon
1953The expression of reciprocity. English Studies 34: 252–257. Crossref link
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rabin, Chaim
1958The historical background of Qumran Hebrew. Scripta Hierosolymitana 4: 144–161.
2000Rabin, The Development of the Syntax of Post-Biblical Hebrew (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics, 29), Leiden: Brill.
Rapold, Christian J.
2011Semantics of Khoekhoe reciprocal constructions. In Evans et al. (eds), 61–74.
Rawlins, Kyle
2015Indifference and scalar inferences in free relatives. In Epistemic Indefinites: Exploring Modality Beyond the Verbal Domain, Luis Alonso-Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds), 267–288. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Reinhart, Tanya
1995Interface Strategies. Utrecht: OTS Working Papers in Linguistics.
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
2005The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–436. Crossref link
Rendsburg, Gary A.
1990Diglossia in Ancient Hebrew. New Haven CT: American Oriental Society.
del Río Sánchez, Francisco
2013Influences of Aramaic on Dialectal Arabic. In Archaism and Innovation in the Semitic Languages, Juan Pedro Monferrer-Sala & Wilfred G. E. Watson (eds), 129–136. Córdoba: Oriens Academic.
Roberts, Craige
1987Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
2012Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 1–69. Crossref link
Roberts, Ian
2007Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
van Rooij, Robert & Schulz, Robert Katrin
2007Only: Meaning and implicatures. In Questions in Dynamic Semantics, Aloni Maria, Alastair Butler & Paul Dekker (eds), 193–223. London: Elsevier.
Rosch, Eleanor
1973On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Timothy E. Moore (ed.), 111–144. New York NY: Academic Press. Crossref link
Rosch, Eleanor & Mervis, Carolyn B.
1975Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605. Crossref link
Rubin, Aaron D.
2005Studies in Semitic Grammaticalization [Harvard Semitic Series 57]. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.
2008The subgrouping of the Semitic languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 79–102. Crossref link
2010The Mehri Language of Oman. Leiden: Brill. Crossref link
Rudolph, Udo & Friedrich Försterling
1997The psychological causality implicit in verbs: A review. Psychological Bulletin 121: 192–218
Sabar, Yona
2002A Jewish Neo-Aramaic Dictionary: Dialects of Amidya, Dihok, Nerwa and Zakho, northwestern Iraq; Based on Old and New Manuscripts, Oral and Written Bible Translations, Folkloric Texts, and Diverse Spoken Registers, with an Introduction to Grammar and Semantics, and an Index of Talmudic Words which have Reflexes in Jewish Neo-Aramaic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Sabato, Sivan & Winter, Yoad
2012Relational domains and the interpretation of reciprocals. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 191–241. Crossref link
Salonen, Erkki
1962Untersuchungen zur Schrift und Sprache des Altbabylonischen von Susa, mit Berücksichtigung der Mâlamir-Texte. Helsinki: Societas Orientalis Fennica.
Sanders, Ted
2005Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In Proceedings/Actes SEM-05, First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning, 105–114. Biarritz.
Sanders, Ted. J. & Noordman, Leo G.
2000The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29: 37–60. Crossref link
Sapir, Edward
1931Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean language. Texts of the Kaibab Paiutes and Uintah Utes. Southern Paiute Dictionary [Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65]. Boston MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Sauerland, Uli
1998Plurals, derived, and reciprocals. The Interpretive Tract: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25: 177–204.
2004a“A team,” definitely. Snippets 9: 11–12.
2004bA Comprehensive Semantics for Agreement. Montreal: McGill.
Schwarzschild, Roger
1996Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Segal, Erwin M., Duchan, Judith F. & Scott, Paula J.
1991The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 14: 27–54. Crossref link
Segal, Moses H.
1908Mišnaic Hebrew and its relation to Biblical Hebrew and Aramaic. Jewish Quarterly review 20: 647–737. Crossref link
1927Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew. Oxford: Clarendon.
1936 Diqduq lešon ha-mišna. Tel-Aviv: Devir.
Sharvit, Shimon
2006Language and Style of Avoth through the Ages. Beer-Sheva: Ben Gurion University of the Negev Press.
Sichel, Ivy
2001Studies in the Syntax of Features and Pronouns. Phd dissertation, CUNY.
2008Demonstrative pronouns and anaphora. In Hebrew Theoretical Linguistics, Galia Hatav (ed.), 279–307. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
2009New evidence for the structural realization of the implicit external argument in nominalizations. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 712–723. Crossref link
Sichel, Ivy & Wiltschko, Martina
2018Demonstrative pronouns and the linguistic encoding of appraisal. In WCCFL 36: Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, William G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan (eds), 365–373. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Siloni, Tal
2001Reciprocal verbs. In Proceedings of the Israeli Association of Theoretical Linguistics 17, Yehuda N. Falk (ed.). Jerusalem: IATL.
2002Active lexicon. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 383–400.
2008On the Hitpa’el template. In Theoretical Hebrew Linguistics, Galia Hatav (ed.), 111–138. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
2012Reciprocal verbs and symmetry. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30: 261–320. Crossref link
Sinha, Jasmin
2000Der neuostaramäische Dialekt von Bēṣpän (Provinz Mardin, Südosttürkei): Eine grammatische Darstellung. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2014Modality, antiveridicality and complementation: The Romeyka infinitive as a negative polarity item. Lingua 148: 118–146. Crossref link
Sivan, Reuven
1979Leḳsiḳon le-shipur ha-lashon, 3rd edn. Jerusalem: Devir.
Smith, Edward E., Shoben, Edward J. & Rips, Lance J.
1974Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 81: 214–241. Crossref link
Smith. Peter, W.
2017The syntax of semantic agreement in English. Journal of Linguistics 53: 823–863. Crossref link
Sobin, Nicholas
1997Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–43.
Sokoloff, Michael
2002A Dictionary of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic of the Talmudic and Geonic Periods. Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University Press; Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Solstad, Torgrim & Bott, Oliver
2017Causality and causal reasoning in natural language. In The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, Michael R. Waldmann (ed.), 619–644. Oxford: OUP.
Spector, Benjamin
2013Homogeneity and plurals: From the strongest meaning hypothesis to supervaluations. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18, Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Fălăus, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds). https://​semanticsarchive​.net​/sub2013​/ProceedingsSuB18​.pdf
Spector Shirtz, Ilona
2014The Syntax of Non-verbal Predication in Modern Hebrew: Predicate Nominals, Pseudoclefts and Clefts. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Stadel, Christian
2013Morphosyntax of Samaritan Aramaic. Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute.
Stalnaker, Robert
1973Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–457. Crossref link
1978Assertion. In Pragmatics [Syntax and Semantics ], Peter Cole (ed.), 315–332. New York NY: Academic Press.
1998On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7: 3–19. Crossref link
Stein, David E. S.
2008The noun אִישׁ (’îš) in Biblical Hebrew: A term of affiliation. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 8: 1–24. Crossref link
Stuurman, Frits
1987Each other – one another: ‘There will always prove to be a difference’. English Studies 68: 353–360. Crossref link
Sulkala, Helena & Karjalainen, Merja
1992Finnish. London: Routledge.
Tadmor, Hayim
1958Historical implications of the correct rendering of Akkadian dâku. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 17: 129–141. Crossref link
Talay, Shabo
2008Die neuaramäischen Dialekte der Khabur-Assyrer in Nordostsyrien: Einführung, Phonologie und Morphologie. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Testen, David
1998The derivational role of the Semitic N-Stem. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 88: 127–145. Crossref link
Thackston, Wheeler M.
2006Kurmanji Kurdish: A Reference Grammar with Selected Readings. Diyarbakir: Renas Media.
Thomason, Richmond H.
1990Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Intentions in Communication, Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds), 325–363. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1979On Complementation in Icelandic. New York NY: Garland.
Trabasso, Tom & van den Broek, Paul
1985Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 612–630. Crossref link
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Heine, Bernd
1991Introduction. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol I [Typologial Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Trivers, Robert L.
1971The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57. Crossref link
Vachek, Josef
1966The Linguistic School of Prague: An Introduction to its Theory and Practice. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Vezzosi, Letizia
2010Micro-process of grammaticalization: The case of Italian l’un l’altro. In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119], Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds), 343–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 1: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: Brill.
Voigt, Rainer
2001Semitische Verwandtschaftstermini. In New Data and New Methods in Afroasiatic Linguistics: Robert Hetzron in Memoriam, Andrzej Zaborski (ed.), 205–218. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Von Soden, Wolfram
1931Der hymnisch-epische Dialekt des Akkadischen. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Aarchäologie 40: 163–227.
1933Der hymnisch-epische Dialekt des Akkadischen. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 41: 90–183.
1952Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik [GAG]. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.
de Waal, Frans
2005How animals do business. Scientific American 292: 72–79. Crossref link
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I.
1968Directions for historical linguistics. In Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Werner, Arnold
1991Das Neuwestaramäische IV. Orale Literatur aus Maʿlūla [Semitica Viva; Bd. 4/IV]. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.
Wierzbicka, Anna
2009Reciprocity: An NSM approach to linguistic typology and social universals. Studies in Language 33: 103–174. Crossref link
Willer-Gold, Jana, Arsenijević, Boban, Batinić, Mia, Čordalija Nermina, Kresić, Marijana, Leko, Nedžad, Marušič, Franc Lanko, Milićev, Tanja, Milićević, Nataša, Mitić, Ivana, Nevins, Andrew, Peti-Stantić, Anita, Stanković, Branimir, Šuligoj, Tina& Tušek, Jelena
2016Conjunct agreement and gender in South Slavic: From theory to experiments to theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 24: 187–224. Crossref link
Williams, Edwin
1991Reciprocal scope. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 159–173.
Winter, Yoad
2018Symmetric predicates and the semantics of reciprocal alternations. Semantic and Pragmatics 11: 1–46. Crossref link
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Shmelev, Aleksej D.
2007Sociativity, conjoining, reciprocity and the Latin Prefix com-. In Nedjalkov (ed.), 209–229.
Zeijlstra, Hedzer Hugo
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord, PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019049894