Cover not available
Part of
The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 93–118

Chapter 5
Noun phrases in other-repetitions

Observations of Swedish talk-in-interaction

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
This study examines noun phrases in a specific sequential context: other-repetitions in Swedish conversation, including everyday as well as institutional interaction. Repeating the previous speaker’s words can have various interactional functions, e.g., initiating repair, indicating surprise or challenge, or registering information. Our distributional results show that the NP is the typical item in repetition turns. The original structures targeted by repetitions vary from a single NP to clausal units housing NPs. The analysis shows that the identification of the interactional function of other-repetitions builds on their sequential position, prosodic design, and contextual information. Other-repetitions serve the general function of promoting intersubjectivity and participation in conversation, and the NP is demonstrably a central vehicle for this.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data
  • 3.The distribution of grammatical elements in repetitions
  • 4.Targets and functions of repetitions
    • 4.1Head of a compound
    • 4.2Single noun phrase: Noun, pronoun, proper name
    • 4.3Object of a prepositional phrase
    • 4.4Object of a verb phrase
    • 4.5Constituent of a clause
  • 5.Summary on repetition forms, prosody and interactional function
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 15 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.05lin
References (32)
References
Ainiala, Terhi, Saarelma, Minna & Sjöblom, Paula. 2016. Names in Focus. An Introduction to Finnish Onomastics. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Allwood, Jens (ed.). 1999. Talspråksfrekvenser (Spoken language frequencies) [Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics S:21]. Göteborg: Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Ambrazaitis, Gilbert & House, David. 2017. Multimodal prominences: Exploring the patterns of focal pitch accents, head beats and eyebrow beats in Swedish television news readings. Speech Communication 95: 100–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anward, Jan & Linell, Per. 1976. Om lexikaliserade fraser i svenskan (On lexicalized phrases in Swedish). Nysvenska studier 55–56: 77–119.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Trevor & Walker, Traci. 2013. Managing problems of acceptability through high rise-fall repetitions. Discourse Processes 50(2): 107–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2018. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. <[URL]> (5 May 2018).
Bruce, Gösta. 2004. An intonational typology of Swedish. In SP-2004, 175–178. ISCA Archive, <[URL]> (12 August 2019).
Chafe, Wallace & Danielewicz, Jane. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Comprehending Oral and Written Language, Rosalind Horowitz & S. Jay Samuels (eds), 83–113. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci. 2005. Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of “repetitions”. Discourse Processes 39(1): 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2018. Co-operative Action. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Huhtamäki, Martina. 2015. Frågor med stigande och jämn slutintonation i Helsingforssvenska samtal (Questions with a rising and level final intonation in Helsinki Swedish conversations). Folkmålsstudier 53: 79–93.Google Scholar
Huhtamäki, Martina, Lindström, Jan & Londen, Anne-Marie. 2020. Other-repetition sequences in Finland Swedish: Prosody, grammar, and context in action ascription. Special issue Other-repetition in Conversation across Languages, published online 11 March 2020, Language in Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John & Local, John. 1989. Doing Phonology: Observing, Recording, Interpreting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin. 2015. Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1:1: 164–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. On the preference for remembering: Acknowledging an answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“Oh that’s right”). Research on Language and Social Interaction 46: 277–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2006. Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1752–1775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persson, Rasmus. 2015. Registering and repair-initiating repeats in French talk-in-interaction. Discourse Studies 17(5): 583–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuter, Mikael. 1992. Swedish as a pluricentric language. In Pluricentric Languages, Michael Clyne (ed.), 101–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2013. Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.), 261–292. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2015. Other-initiated repair in Italian. Open Linguistics 1(1): 256–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In press. Other-repetition in conversation across languages: Bringing prosody into pragmatic typology. Special issue Other-repetition in Conversation across Languages, edited by Giovanni Rossi to appear in Language in Society.
Routarinne, Sara. 2003. Tytöt äänessä: Parenteesit ja nouseva sävelkulku kertojien vuorovaikutuskeinoina (Girls Talk: Parentheses and Rising Intonation as Narrators’ Interactional Resource). PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary-cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23(3): 499–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selenius, Ebba. 1969. Västnyländsk ordaccent (Western Nyland Word Accent). Ph. Lic. thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth. 2017. Visual representation of acoustic data: A survey and suggestions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(4): 363–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue & Kitzinger, Celia. 2006. Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2): 150–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yokomori, Daisuke, Yasui, Eiko & Hajikano, Are. 2017. Registering the receipt of information with a modulated stance: A study of ne-marked other-repetitions in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 123: 167–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar