Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 177–212

Chapter 6
Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs

| Institute for Linguistic Studies RAS, Laboratory for Typological Study of Languages

Descriptions of antipassive constructions in individual languages show that these constructions are often compatible with only a subset of transitive verbs. There are significant typological similarities between the sets of verbs that allow antipassivization. The following properties are typical of these verbs: (1) agentive A, (2) specification of the manner component in the verb meaning, (3) lack of inherent telicity (the transitive use can be compositionally transitive, but this is cancelled under antipassivization), (4) narrow class of potential Ps, and (5) affectedness of A. Verbs with all of the properties in (1)–(5), such as ‘eat’, constitute the core of “natural antipassives”, whereas verbs with only some of these properties are at the periphery of this class. Apart from being especially prone to enter antipassive constructions, the fuzzy class of natural antipassives is relevant for a number of phenomena. First, polyfunctional valency-related markers or constructions tend to yield antipassive reading when applied to natural antipassives. Second, natural antipassives tend to choose the less marked construction in languages with two antipassive constructions. Third, lexicalization of antipassives is more likely for verbs that lack natural antipassive properties, and a typical scenario of lexicalization involves coercion of some of these properties. Ultimately, I conjecture that it is the relevance of the P-argument for the meaning of the verb which accounts for the rarity of lexically unrestricted and semantically uniform antipassive constructions in the world’s languages.

Keywords: affectedness, agentivity, antipassive, lexical meaning, lexicalization, manner and result verbs, productivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The limits of natural antipassives
    • 2.1Lexical lists
    • 2.2Properties
    • 2.3Inanimacy of the P-argument
  • 3.Natural antipassives and the lexical extent of antipassives
  • 4.Natural antipassives and syncretic antipassive markers
  • 5.Languages with multiple antipassive constructions
  • 6.Lexicalization of antipassives
    • 6.1Lexical effects of antipassivization
    • 6.2Coerced agentivity
    • 6.3Semantic incorporation of the P-argument
  • 7.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.06say
References
Arkadiev, Peter & Letuchiy, Alexander
2008 Derivacii antipassivnoj zony v adygejskom jazyke. In Issledovanija po glagol’noj derivacii, Vladmir Plungian & Sergey Tatevosov (eds), 77–102. Moscow: JaSK.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter K.
2013 A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia (2nd edn). London: SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
Basilico, David
2012 The antipassive and its relation to scalar structure. In The End of Argument Structure? [Syntax and Semantics 38], María Cristina Cuervo & Yves Roberge (eds), 75–103. Bingley: Emerald Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna
2013 Ainu valency patterns. In Valency Patterns Leipzig, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]> (24 June 2017).
2015 Valency classes in Ainu. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 807–854. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2021 Unspecified participant: A case of antipassive in Ainu. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1985 The Pipil Language of El Salvador. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Forker, Diana, Khalilova, Zaira & van der Berg, Helma
2021 Antipassives in Nakh-Daghestanian languages: Exploring the margins of a construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1994 A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds). 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
1992 La voix en soninké. Mandenkan 23: 1–24.Google Scholar
2012 The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm, 29 August–1 September.
2014 P-lability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics 52(4): 911–944. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Valency properties of Mandinka verbs. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 221–259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2021 Antipassive derivation in Soninke (West Mande). In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayley, Jon P.
1985 Tzutujil Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
de Swart, Peter, Lamers, Monique & Lestrade, Sander
2008 Animacy, argument structure, and argument encoding. Lingua 118: 131–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1972 The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977 A Grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000 Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 3–29. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estigarribia, Bruno
2017 A grammar sketch of Paraguayan Guaraní. In Guarani Linguistics in the 21st Century, Bruno Estigarribia & Justin Pinta (eds), 7–85. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1986 Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder (eds), 95–107. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Fleck, David W.
2006 Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30(3): 541–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Bommelyn, Loren
2000 The evolution of de-transitive voice in Tolowa Athabaskan. Studies in Language 24(1): 41–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Iren
2013 Hoocąk valency patterns. In Valency Patterns Leipzig, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds). [URL]> (24 June 2017).
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2006 Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Transitivity prominence. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 131–147. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1976 Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1999 A Grammar of Koyraboro (Koroboro) Senni. The Songhay of Gao, Mali. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina
2017 A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2021 Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their sources. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2013 L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation. Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2021 The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I.
1994 On the lexical distribution of agent-preserving and object-preserving transitivity alternation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17(2): 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksander E. & Testelec, Jakov G.
2004 Bezhta. In The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus, Vol. 3: The North East Caucasian Languages, Part 1, Michael Job (ed.), 217–298. Ann Arbor MI: Caravan.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternation. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2015 Verb classes within and across languages. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1627–1670. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, František
1999 Reciprocals without reflexives. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions [Typological Studies in Language 40], Zygmunt Frajzingier & Tracy S. Curl (eds), 31–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008 A Grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2005 Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competition. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages, Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Valency classes and alternations: parameters of variation. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 73–130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2016 “Ambivalent voice”: Markedness effects in valency change. In Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Studies on Japanese and Beyond, Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds), 389–422. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1976 Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2021 Antipassive propensities and alignment. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, James Lorin
1981 Voice in Quiche-Maya. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007 Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 How transitive are eat and drink verbs? In The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking [Typological Studies in Language 84], John Newman (ed.), 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie
2002 Relations entre fonctions syntaxiques et fonctions sémantiques en wolof. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2013 Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]> (21 June 2017).
2017 Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa DeMena Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pustet, Regina & Rood, David S.
2008 Argument dereferentialization in Lakota. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment, Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 334–356. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, Diego J.
2007 The Chibchan Languages. Cartago: Editorial Tecnólogica de Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1998 Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren
1989 A Grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2017 Where do antipassive constructions come from? A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Say, Sergey
2005 Antipassive sja-verbs in Russian: Between inflection and derivation. In Morphology and its Demarcations [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264], Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: Semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis. PhD dissertation, St. Petersburg, Institute for Linguistic Studies, RAS.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina & Mutalov, Rasul
2003 A Grammar of Icari Dargwa. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2011 Detelicization and argument suppression: Evidence from Godoberi. Linguistics 49(1): 135–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terrill, Angela
1997 The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1985 Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 385–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 A Grammar of Warrongo. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vakhtin, Nikolai B.
1981 Refleksiv v eskimosskom jazyke. In Zalogovye konstrukcii v raznostrukturnyx jazykax, Viktor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 266–272. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren
2015 Statistical observations on implicational (verb) hierarchies. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 155–181. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2016 Quantitative tests of implicational verb hierarchies. In Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Studies on Japanese and Beyond, Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen (eds), 423–444. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yanko-Trinickaya, Nadija A.
1962 Vozvratnye glagoly v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Moscow: AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Yemel’yanova, Nina M.
1982 Klassy glagolov v eskimosskom jazyke. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zinnatullina, Klara Z.
1969 Zalogi glagola v sovremennom tatarskom jazyke. Kazan: Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Arkadiev, Peter M. & Alexander Letuchiy
2021. Chapter 15. Indirect antipassive in Circassian. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
Bugaeva, Anna
2021. Chapter 7. Unspecified participant. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Chapter 8. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 968 ff. DOI logo
van Lier, Eva & Maria Messerschmidt
2022. Lexical restrictions on grammatical relations in voice and valency constructions. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.