Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 213–246

Chapter 7
Unspecified participant

A case of antipassive in Ainu

| Tokyo University of Science | National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
This paper shows that there are two synchronically distinct i- markers in Ainu, viz. the derivational antipassive i- and inflectional ‘fourth’ person object i- with the functions of first person plural inclusive, second person honorific, and logophoric. The derivational antipassive marker i- ‘person/thing’ can be regarded as an antipassive marker per se based on its syntactic (eliminating a patient/theme/recipient argument), semantic (denoting an unspecified generic participant or lexicalizing it to a single or subset of objects) and discourse (patient-defocusing) properties. Contrary to the accepted view, I adduce the ‘antipassive to 1pl.incl.o’ scenario based on extensive cross-linguistic and Ainu-internal evidence. The antipassive i-, in its turn, originated in the incorporation of a generic noun *i ‘thing/place/time’, which is not unusual in languages without overt expression of the demoted O participant in the antipassive. The extended use of the antipassive i- is attested on obligatorily possessed nouns to enable their use without possessive affixes. Finally, my corpus-based study of semantic classes of verbs with a predilection for antipassive derivation revealed that the antipassive in Ainu is most likely to apply to a ‘middle section’ of the semantic transitivity hierarchy since it belongs to the lower individuation of patients (LIP) type, which is assumed to be more typical of antipassives in non-ergative languages.
Keywords: antipassive, Ainu, non-ergative languages, ‘fourth’ person, diachrony
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Typological background
  • 3.Featuring i- as an antipassive, distinct from personal i-
    • 3.1Standard use on verbs
    • 3.2Extended (absolutive) use of i- on nouns and other parts of speech
  • 4.Synchronic properties of the antipassive i-
    • 4.1Deriving antipassives
    • 4.2Combinability of the antipassive i- with other voice markers
  • 5.Semantic profile of antipassive verbs
  • 6.Diachronic pathways and cross-linguistic evidence for the development of the i- antipassive
    • 6.1‘Fourth’ person markers: No parallelism between a(n)- (A)/-an (S) and i- (O)
    • 6.2The diachronic source of the i- antipassive
    • 6.3‘Fourth’ person markers: What is the key function?
    • 6.4Matching the antipassive i- and ‘fourth’ person i- : Cross-linguistic evidence
  • 7.Summary
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Source
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.07bug
References (77)
Source
C Bugaeva, Anna, Endō, Shiho & Akasegawa, Shirō. 2015. A Topical Dictionary of Conversational Ainu. (English HP). NINJAL. Available online at <[URL]>
K Nakagawa, Hiroshi, Bugaeva, Anna & Kobayashi, Miki (eds). 2016–2018. A Glossed Audio Corpus of Ainu Folklore. (English HP). NINJAL. Available online at <[URL]>
OI Oda, Ito. (1908–2000), consultant of the Chitose dialect of Ainu (fieldnotes)Google Scholar
T1 Tamura, Suzuko. 1984. Ainugo onseishiryō 1 [Ainu Audio Materials 1]. Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogaku kyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
T2 Tamura, Suzuko. 1985. Ainugo onseishiryō 2 [Ainu Audio Materials 2]. Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogaku kyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
T3 Tamura, Suzuko. 1986. Ainugo onseishiryō 3 [Ainu Audio Materials 3]. Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogaku kyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
T5 Tamura, Suzuko. 1988. Ainugo onseishiryō 5 [Ainu Audio Materials 5]. Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogaku kyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
References
Adamou, Evangelia. 2014. L’antipassif en ixcateque. Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris 109(1): 373–396.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso de la Fuente, José A. 2012. The Ainu Languages: Traditional Reconstruction, Eurasian Areal Linguistics, and Diachronic (Holistic) Typology. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Auderset, Sandra. 2015. Voice and Person Marking – A Typological Study. MA dissertation, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
. 2021. The antipassive and its relationship to person markers. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, John. 1938. An Ainu-English-Japanese Dictionary. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna. 2013. Obligatory possessive inflection. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (7 August 2020).
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin. 2015. First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of East Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna. 2004. Grammar and Folklore Texts of the Chitose Dialect of Ainu (Idiolect of Ito Oda) [ELPR Publication Series A-045]. Suita: Osaka Gakuin University.Google Scholar
. 2008. Reported discourse and logophoricity in Southern Hokkaido dialects of Ainu. Gengo Kenkyū 133: 31–75.Google Scholar
. 2011. A diachronic study of the impersonal passive in Ainu. In Impersonal Constructions Cross-Linguistically [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds) 517–546. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Ainu valency patterns. In Valency Patterns Leipzig, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (7 August 2020).
. 2015. Valency classes in Ainu. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 807–854. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2017. Polysynthesis in Ainu. In Handbook of Polysynthesis, Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds), 882–905. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bugaeva, Anna, Nichols, Johanna & Bickel, Balthasar. Submitted. Verbs in appositive possession: Ainu and the Circum-Pacific languages.
Chiri, Mashiho. 1974 [1936]. Ainu gohō gaisetu (An outline of Ainu grammar). In Chiri Mashiho chosakushū, v. 4, 3–197. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
. 1973 [1942]. Ainu gohō kenkyū – karafuto hōgen-o chūshin to shite (Studies in Ainu grammar – with an emphasis on the Sakhalin dialect). Chiri Mashiho Chosakushū, v. 3, 455–586. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Сausal Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleck, David. W. 2006. Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30(3): 551–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1996. West Greenlandic half-transitive affixes in a diachronic perspective. West Greenlandic half-transitive affixes in a diachronic perspective. In Cultural and Social Research in Greenland 95/96, Essays in Honour of Robert Petersen, Birgitte Jacobsen (ed.), 34–44. Nuuk: Ilisimatusarfik/Atuakkiorfik.Google Scholar
. 2003. Diachronic typology and the genealogical unity of Chukotko-Kamchatkan. Linguistic Typology 7(1): 51–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Comparative Chukotko-Kamchatkan Dictionary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Polysynthesis in the Arctic/ Sub-Arctic: How recent is it? In Language Typology and Historical Contingency: In Honor of Johanna Nichols [Typological Studies in Language 104], Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds), 241–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, (Tamura) Suzuko. 2001 [1955]. Ainugo-no dōshi-no kōzō (The structure of verbs in Ainu). Gengo Kenkyū 30: 46–64.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. 2005. A Grammar of Cupeño. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Jirō. 1983. Hoppō shogengo ni yosete (On the occasion of publication on Northern languages). Gengo 11: 38–45.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Kyōsuke. 1993 [1931]. Ainu yūkara gohō tekiyō (An outline grammar of the Ainu epic poetry). In Ainu jojishi yūkara no kenkyū 2, 1–233. Tokyo: Tōyō Bunko. Reprint in Ainugogaku kōgi 2 [Lectures on Ainu studies 2]. Kindaichi Kyōsuke zenshū. Ainugo I. v. 5, 145–366. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Kirikae, Hideo. 1983. Ainugo dōshi ron (A study of Ainu verbs). MA dissertation, Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. Adnominal possession. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 960–970. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac, Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Polinskaja, Marija S. 1988. Antipassive in Chukchee. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubodera, Itsuhiko. 1977. Ainu bungaku (Ainu literature). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. On grammatical relationality. Folia Linguistica 19(1–2): 67–109.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard. 2010. Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 1999. Valence and Transitivity in Saliba: An Oceanic Language of Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1993. Reconstructing the unidentified. In Historical Linguistics 1989: Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, New Brunswick, 14–18 August, 1989 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 106], Henk Aertsen & Robert J. Jeffers (eds), 329–347. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito. 2015. Valency classes in Central Alaskan Yupik, an Eskimoan language. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1165–1204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hiroshi. 1995. Ainugo Chitose hōgen jiten (A dictionary of the Chitose dialect of Ainu). Tokyo: Sōfūkan.Google Scholar
. 1997. Ainu mukashibanashi no sekai (The world of Ainu fairy tales). Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
. 2002. Ainugo kōshōbungei tekisuto 3 (Ainu Folklore Text 3). Chiba Daigaku Yūrashia Bunka Ronshū 5: 111–143.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2005. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil (eds), 438–439. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Refsing, Kirsten. 1986. The Ainu Language: The Morphology and Syntax of the Shizunai Dialect. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A Grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea. 2017. Where do antipassive constructions come from? – A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Satō, Tomomi. 1997. Possessive expressions in Ainu, In Hayashi Tōru & Bhaskararao, Peri (eds) Studies in Possessive Expressions. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 143–160.Google Scholar
. 1998. Kinezumi (ezorisu) ga onna o kadowakasu hanashi (A story of a squirrel who kidnapped a woman). In Ainu minzoku bunkazai chōsa hōkokusho. Ainu minzoku chōsa, v. XVIII, Hitoshi Watanabe, Minoru Ōshima, Hideo Kirikae & Tomomi Satō (eds). Sapporo: Hokkaido kyōiku iinkai.Google Scholar
. 2004. Ainu bungaku ni okeru ichininshōtai no mondai (Some problems with the first person narration in Ainu). Hokudai Bungaku Kenkyūka Kiyō 112: 171–185.Google Scholar
. 2008. Ainugo bunpō-no kiso (The basics of Ainu grammar). Tokyo: Daigakushorin.Google Scholar
Say, Sergey. 2021. The antipassive derivation and the lexical meaning of the verb. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1983. Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stirtz, Timothy M. 2012. A Grammar of Gaahmg, a Nilo-Saharan Language of Sudan. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Sunazawa, Kura. 1983. Watashi no ichidai no omoide. Ku sukup opuspe (My life story). Sapporo: Miyama Shobō.Google Scholar
Tamura, Suzuko. 2001 [1970a]. Personal affixes in the Saru dialect of Ainu. In Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics, Roman Jakobson & Shigeo Kawamoto (eds), 577–611. Tokyo: TEC. (Reprint in Ainugo-kō, Bunpō I, Vol. 4, 206–240. Tokyo: Yumani Shobō).Google Scholar
. 2001 [1970b]. Ainugo Ishikari hōgen ni okeru ninshō setsuji no syukaku/mokutekikaku setsugō (Nominative-objective affixation of personal affixes in the Ishikari Dialect of Ainu). Gengo no kagaku 1, Tokyo gengo kenkyūjo. (Reprint in Ainugo-kō, Bunpō I , Vol. 4, 241–262. Tokyo: Yumani Shobō).Google Scholar
. 2001 [1972]. Ainugo saru hōgen-ni mirareru chōfukuhō (Reduplication in the Saru dialect of Ainu). Ajia afurika bunpō kenkyū 1 . (Reprint in: Ainugo-kō, Bunpō I, V. 4, 357-369. Tokyo: Yumani Shobō).Google Scholar
. 1993 [1979]. Aynu Itak. Aynugo nyūmon (The Ainu language. An introduction into Ainu) [Goken kyōzai sensho 21]. Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogaku kyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
. 1984. Aynu Itak. Aynugo nyūmon. Kaisetu (The Ainu language. An introduction into Ainu. Commentary) [ Goken kyōzai sensho 3]. Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogaku kyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
. 1984–2000. Ainugo onseishiryō 1–12 (Ainu audio materials 1–12). Tokyo: Waseda daigaku gogakukyōiku kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
. 1988. Ainugo (The Ainu language). In Gengogaku daijiten, Takashi Kamei, Rokurō Kōno & Eiichi Chino (eds), 6–94.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Ainu Language [ICHEL Linguistic Studies Vol. 2]. (English translation of Tamura 1988). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
. 1996. Ainugo Saru hōgen jiten (A dictionary of the Saru dialect of Ainu). Tokyo: Sōfuukan.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 141–177. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Vigus, Meagan. 2018. Antipassive constructions: Correlations of form and function across languages. Linguistic Typology 22(3): 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vovin, Alexander. 1993. A Reconstruction of Proto-Ainu. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Honoré. 2013. Sliammon valency patterns. In Valency Patterns Leipzig, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (6 March 2018).
Yoshida, Iwao. 1989. Hokkaido Ainu hōgen goi shūsei (A collection of Hokkaido Ainu lexicon). Shōgakukan: Tokyo.Google Scholar
Young, Robert W. & Morgan, William. 1987. The Navajo Language: A Grammar and Colloquial Dictionary, rev. edn. Albuquerque NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Say, Sergey
2021. Chapter 6. Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.