Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 385–426

Chapter 12
The antipassive and its relationship to person markers

This paper presents a cross-linguistic study of morphological overlaps between antipassive and person markers and their historical relationships, addressing the question of how frequent developments from antipassive to person marker or vice versa are and whether there are recurrent patterns of change. The results show that historical connections between antipassive and person markers are not confined to a specific macro-area or language family. The development from antipassive to first person plural patient marker is the most frequent pathway in the languages investigated. However, this diachronic pathway does not account for all cases, i.e. other pathways are also possible. While many uncertainties concerning the detailed history of such diachronic connections remain, this study shows that there are tendencies that contribute to the understanding of the history and subsequent development of antipassives.

Keywords: antipassive, person marking, language change, diachronic typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the diachrony of antipassives
    • a.Agent nominalizations
    • b.Action/result nominalization
    • c.Reflexives and/or reciprocals
    • d.Generic nouns
  • 3.Collection and analysis of the data
  • 4.Antipassives and person markers across macro-areas
    • 4.1Africa
    • 4.2Eurasia
    • 4.3North America
    • 4.4South America
    • 4.5Pacific
    • 4.6Australia
  • 5.Pathways
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Glosses
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.12aud
References
Aldridge, Edith
2012 Antipassive in Austronesian alignment change. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 331–345. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D.
2011 Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332(6027): 346–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babaev, Kirill
2010 Person marking in South-West Mande languages: A tentative reconstruction. Mandenkan 46: 3–48.Google Scholar
van den Berg, René
1989 A Grammar of the Muna Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1991 Muna historical phonology. In Studies in Sulawesi Linguistics, Vol. 2, James N. Sneddon (ed.), 1–28. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin
2015 First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert A.
2013 The Austronesian Languages, rev. edn. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bostoen, Koen, Dom, Sebastian & Segerer, Guillaume
2015 The antipassive in Bantu. Linguistics 53(4): 731–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Dingare, Shipra & Manning, Christopher D.
2001 Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 13–32. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Caminsky, Dibella
2017 The proof is in the (anti)passive: Valency, transitivity and aspect in Chukotko-Kamchatkan. Paper presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the LSA, Austin TX, 5–8 January.
Charney, Jean Ormsbee
1993 A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann
1987 Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan
2000 Vestiges of nous and the 1st person plural verb in informal spoken French. Language Sciences 22(4): 447–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette Grinevald
1979 The antipassive and Jacaltec. Papers in Mayan Linguistics 7: 139–164.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2012 The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages. [URL] (9 August 2020).
Creissels, Denis & Sambou, Pierre
2013 Le mandinka: Phonologie, grammaire, textes. Paris: Karthala Editions.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1977 A Grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dom, Sebastian, Segerer, Guillaume & Bostoen, Koen
2015 Antipassive/reciprocal polysemy in Cilubà (Bantu, L31a): A plurality of relations analysis. Studies in Language 39(2): 386–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Machlachlan, Anna
1999 What agreement in Chamorro? Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2). [URL] (10 August 2020).
Doornenbal, Marius
2009 A Grammar of Bantawa. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael John
1999 A Grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Evans, Bethwyn
2003 A Study of Valency-changing Devices in Proto Oceanic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fleck, David W.
2006 Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30(3): 551–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael
2003 Diachronic typology and the genealogical unity of Chukotko-Kamchatkan. Linguistic Typology 7(1): 51–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E.
1998 Inside and outside the middle. In 33rd International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, 166–220. Seattle WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
2006 The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics 48(1): 44–81.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1994 Semantic and pragmatic inverse: Inverse alignment and inverse voice in Carib of Surinam. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2000 On the genesis of the verb phrase in Cariban languages: Diversity through reanalysis. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 43], Spike Gildea (ed.), 65–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Diachronic typology of passive in the Cariban family. [URL] (10 August 2020).
Givón, Talmy
2006 Grammatical relations in passive clauses. In Passivization and Typology [Typological Studies in Language 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 337–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald & Donohue, Mark
2014 Some principles on the use of macro-areas in typological comparison. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1): 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert, Haspelmath, Martin & Bank, Sebastian
2020 Glottolog 4.2.1. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. [URL] (10 August 2020).
Haspelmath, Martin
1990 The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2014 Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna
2016a On the reflexive-antipassive polysemy: Typological convergence from unrelated languages. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Nicholas Rolle, Jeremy Steffman & John Sylak-Glassman (eds), 158–173. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2016b L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Brussels: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Middle voice, transitivity, and the elaboration of events. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 179–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Geoffrey David
1985 A Descriptive Grammar of Koasati (Louisiana). PhD dissertation, Tulane University.Google Scholar
Kurebito, Tokusu
2012 An outline of valency-reducing operations in Chukchi. In Objectivization and Subjectiviziation: A Typology of Voice [Senri Ethnological Studies 77], Wataru Nakamura & Ritsuko Kikusawa (eds), 177–189. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1977 Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar: An Overview of Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 1. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991 Reciprocals and depatientives in To’aba’ita. In Currents in Pacific Linguistics. Papers on Austronesian Languages and Ethnolinguistics in Honour of George W. Grace, 171–183. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
2000 Reciprocals without reflexives. In Reciprocals: Forms and Functions, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 41], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds), 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Reciprocals and related meanings in To’aba’ita. In Reciprocal Constructions, [Typological Studies in Language 71], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 1547–1574. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 A Grammar of Toqabaqita [Mouton Grammar Library 42]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKay, Carolyn Joyce
1999 A Grammar of Misantla Totonac. Salt Lake City UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Maiga, Ismaël
2001 Parlons bambara: Langue et culture bambara. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna
1999 Valence and Transitivity in Saliba: An Oceanic Language of Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
McDaniels, Todd
2014 Rationale and purposive clauses in Comanche. International Journal of American Linguistics 80(1): 69–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio
1999 A Grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
2000 The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, [Typological Studies in Language 43], Spike Gildea (ed.), 201–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike
1994 Saliba. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2008 Constructions expressing middle, reflexive and reciprocal situations in some Oceanic languages. In Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations, Volker Gast & Ekkehard König (eds), 105–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
2007 Reciprocal constructions in Chukchi (with an appendix on Koryak). In Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 1677–1714. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Stanley
1977 The Salish independent pronoun system. International Journal of American Linguistics 43(4): 302–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. & Payne, Doris L.
2013 A Typological Grammar of Panare. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2013 Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (10 August 2020).
Reh, Mechthild
1985 Die Krongo-Sprache. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A.
2002 Morphosyntactic evidence for the position of Chamorro in the Austronesian language family. In Collected Papers on Southeast Asian and Pacific Languages, R. Bauer (ed.), 63–94. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Robertson, John S.
1992 The History of Tense/Aspect/Mood/Voice in the Mayan Verbal Complex. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2017a Agent-defocusing constructions from nominalized VPs. Studies in Language 40(4): 849–954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b What diachronic typology can tell us about language universals and variation. Paper presented at the workshop “Variation and universals in language – The implications of typological evidence for formal grammar”, Crecchio (PE), Italy. [URL] (10 August 2020).
2017c Where do antipassive constructions come from? – A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C.
1994 Comparative Kadu wordlists. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 40: 11–48.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
2010 The Grammaticalization of Antipassives [URL] (10 August 2020).
Sharma, Narayan P.
2014 The Morphosyntax of Puma. A Tibeto-Burman Language of Nepal. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985 Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4): 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2010 From third plural to passive: Incipient, emergent and established passives. Diachronica 27(1): 73–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suttles, Wayne P.
2004 Musqueam Reference Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, Logan
2014 Kiowa-Tanoan: A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela
1997 The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 A Grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Chad
1996 The Na-Dene middle voice: An impersonal source of the D-element. International Journal of American Linguistics 62(4): 351–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Claudia
2012 A Grammar of Savosavo [Mouton Grammar Library 61]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wistrand-Robinson, Lila & Armagost, James
1990 Comanche Dictionary and Grammar [Publications in Linguistics 92]. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bugaeva, Anna
2021. Chapter 7. Unspecified participant. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Chapter 8. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.