Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 385–426

Chapter 12
The antipassive and its relationship to person markers

This paper presents a cross-linguistic study of morphological overlaps between antipassive and person markers and their historical relationships, addressing the question of how frequent developments from antipassive to person marker or vice versa are and whether there are recurrent patterns of change. The results show that historical connections between antipassive and person markers are not confined to a specific macro-area or language family. The development from antipassive to first person plural patient marker is the most frequent pathway in the languages investigated. However, this diachronic pathway does not account for all cases, i.e. other pathways are also possible. While many uncertainties concerning the detailed history of such diachronic connections remain, this study shows that there are tendencies that contribute to the understanding of the history and subsequent development of antipassives.
Keywords: antipassive, person marking, language change, diachronic typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the diachrony of antipassives
    • a.Agent nominalizations
    • b.Action/result nominalization
    • c.Reflexives and/or reciprocals
    • d.Generic nouns
  • 3.Collection and analysis of the data
  • 4.Antipassives and person markers across macro-areas
    • 4.1Africa
    • 4.2Eurasia
    • 4.3North America
    • 4.4South America
    • 4.5Pacific
    • 4.6Australia
  • 5.Pathways
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Glosses
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.12aud
References (77)
References
Aldridge, Edith. 2012. Antipassive in Austronesian alignment change. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 331–345. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D. 2011. Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332(6027): 346–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babaev, Kirill. 2010. Person marking in South-West Mande languages: A tentative reconstruction. Mandenkan 46: 3–48.Google Scholar
van den Berg, René. 1989. A Grammar of the Muna Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1991. Muna historical phonology. In Studies in Sulawesi Linguistics, Vol. 2, James N. Sneddon (ed.), 1–28. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Gaenszle, Martin. 2015. First person objects, antipassives, and the political history of the Southern Kirant. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2(1): 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert A. 2013. The Austronesian Languages, rev. edn. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bostoen, Koen, Dom, Sebastian & Segerer, Guillaume. 2015. The antipassive in Bantu. Linguistics 53(4): 731–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Dingare, Shipra & Manning, Christopher D. 2001. Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: Voice and person in English and Lummi. In Proceedings of the LFG01 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 13–32. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Caminsky, Dibella. 2017. The proof is in the (anti)passive: Valency, transitivity and aspect in Chukotko-Kamchatkan. Paper presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the LSA, Austin TX, 5–8 January.
Charney, Jean Ormsbee. 1993. A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann. 1987. Transitivity and Discourse Continuity in Chamorro. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 2000. Vestiges of nous and the 1st person plural verb in informal spoken French. Language Sciences 22(4): 447–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette Grinevald. 1979. The antipassive and Jacaltec. Papers in Mayan Linguistics 7: 139–164.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2012. The origin of antipassive markers in West Mande languages. <[URL]> (9 August 2020).
Creissels, Denis & Sambou, Pierre. 2013. Le mandinka: Phonologie, grammaire, textes. Paris: Karthala Editions.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A Grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dom, Sebastian, Segerer, Guillaume & Bostoen, Koen. 2015. Antipassive/reciprocal polysemy in Cilubà (Bantu, L31a): A plurality of relations analysis. Studies in Language 39(2): 386–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Machlachlan, Anna. 1999. What agreement in Chamorro? Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2). <[URL]> (10 August 2020).
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A Grammar of Bantawa. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael John. 1999. A Grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Evans, Bethwyn. 2003. A Study of Valency-changing Devices in Proto Oceanic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fleck, David W. 2006. Antipassive in Matses. Studies in Language 30(3): 551–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 2003. Diachronic typology and the genealogical unity of Chukotko-Kamchatkan. Linguistic Typology 7(1): 51–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E. 1998. Inside and outside the middle. In 33rd International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, 166–220. Seattle WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
2006. The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics 48(1): 44–81.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1994. Semantic and pragmatic inverse: Inverse alignment and inverse voice in Carib of Surinam. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. On the genesis of the verb phrase in Cariban languages: Diversity through reanalysis. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 43], Spike Gildea (ed.), 65–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Diachronic typology of passive in the Cariban family. <[URL]> (10 August 2020).
Givón, Talmy. 2006. Grammatical relations in passive clauses. In Passivization and Typology [Typological Studies in Language 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 337–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald & Donohue, Mark. 2014. Some principles on the use of macro-areas in typological comparison. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1): 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert, Haspelmath, Martin & Bank, Sebastian. 2020. Glottolog 4.2.1. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. <[URL]> (10 August 2020).
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014. Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2016a. On the reflexive-antipassive polysemy: Typological convergence from unrelated languages. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Nicholas Rolle, Jeremy Steffman & John Sylak-Glassman (eds), 158–173. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
. 2016b. L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. Brussels: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Middle voice, transitivity, and the elaboration of events. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 179–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Geoffrey David. 1985. A Descriptive Grammar of Koasati (Louisiana). PhD dissertation, Tulane University.Google Scholar
Kurebito, Tokusu. 2012. An outline of valency-reducing operations in Chukchi. In Objectivization and Subjectiviziation: A Typology of Voice [Senri Ethnological Studies 77], Wataru Nakamura & Ritsuko Kikusawa (eds), 177–189. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar: An Overview of Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 1. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. Reciprocals and depatientives in To’aba’ita. In Currents in Pacific Linguistics. Papers on Austronesian Languages and Ethnolinguistics in Honour of George W. Grace, 171–183. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
. 2000. Reciprocals without reflexives. In Reciprocals: Forms and Functions, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 41], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds), 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Reciprocals and related meanings in To’aba’ita. In Reciprocal Constructions, [Typological Studies in Language 71], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 1547–1574. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. A Grammar of Toqabaqita [Mouton Grammar Library 42]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKay, Carolyn Joyce. 1999. A Grammar of Misantla Totonac. Salt Lake City UT: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Maiga, Ismaël. 2001. Parlons bambara: Langue et culture bambara. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 1999. Valence and Transitivity in Saliba: An Oceanic Language of Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
McDaniels, Todd. 2014. Rationale and purposive clauses in Comanche. International Journal of American Linguistics 80(1): 69–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio. 1999. A Grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
. 2000. The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, [Typological Studies in Language 43], Spike Gildea (ed.), 201–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 1994. Saliba. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 2008. Constructions expressing middle, reflexive and reciprocal situations in some Oceanic languages. In Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations, Volker Gast & Ekkehard König (eds), 105–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007. Reciprocal constructions in Chukchi (with an appendix on Koryak). In Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 1677–1714. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Stanley. 1977. The Salish independent pronoun system. International Journal of American Linguistics 43(4): 302–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. & Payne, Doris L. 2013. A Typological Grammar of Panare. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (10 August 2020).
Reh, Mechthild. 1985. Die Krongo-Sprache. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A. 2002. Morphosyntactic evidence for the position of Chamorro in the Austronesian language family. In Collected Papers on Southeast Asian and Pacific Languages, R. Bauer (ed.), 63–94. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Robertson, John S. 1992. The History of Tense/Aspect/Mood/Voice in the Mayan Verbal Complex. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sansò, Andrea. 2017a. Agent-defocusing constructions from nominalized VPs. Studies in Language 40(4): 849–954. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. What diachronic typology can tell us about language universals and variation. Paper presented at the workshop “Variation and universals in language – The implications of typological evidence for formal grammar”, Crecchio (PE), Italy. <[URL]> (10 August 2020).
. 2017c. Where do antipassive constructions come from? – A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica 34(2): 175–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C. 1994. Comparative Kadu wordlists. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 40: 11–48.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang. 2010. The Grammaticalization of Antipassives <[URL]> (10 August 2020).
Sharma, Narayan P. 2014. The Morphosyntax of Puma. A Tibeto-Burman Language of Nepal. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4): 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2010. From third plural to passive: Incipient, emergent and established passives. Diachronica 27(1): 73–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suttles, Wayne P. 2004. Musqueam Reference Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, Logan. 2014. Kiowa-Tanoan: A Synchronic and Diachronic Study. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 1997. The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. A Grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Chad. 1996. The Na-Dene middle voice: An impersonal source of the D-element. International Journal of American Linguistics 62(4): 351–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Claudia. 2012. A Grammar of Savosavo [Mouton Grammar Library 61]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wistrand-Robinson, Lila & Armagost, James. 1990. Comanche Dictionary and Grammar [Publications in Linguistics 92]. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bugaeva, Anna
2021. Unspecified participant. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna
2021. Variation in the verbal marking of antipassive constructions. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.