Cover not available
Part of
The Linguistics of Olfaction: Typological and Diachronic Approaches to Synchronic Diversity
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Przemysław Staniewski
[Typological Studies in Language 131] 2021
► pp. 1–34

Rendering what the nose perceives

An introduction

 | University of Cologne
 | University of Wrocław
In this chapter, we briefly overview the typological and diachronic research on olfactory expressions and point out possible further research questions. Essentially, we illustrate how linguistic olfactory terms interact with different areas of grammar, e.g. with morphology, and delineate some striking cross-linguistic patterns calling for a deeper unification of language-internal and language-external factors.
Keywords: sense of smell, olfactory perception, sense modalities, typology, diachrony
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the variation of olfactory terms
    • 2.1Lexical repertoires
    • 2.2Non-literal meanings
    • 2.3Morphology
    • 2.4Evidentiality
    • 2.5Diachrony
  • 3.The structure of the volume
  • 4.Conclusion and future directions
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.131.01jed
References (113)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011. The grammaticalization of evidentiality. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 602–610. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Storch, Anne. 2013. Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture [Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 3], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds), 1–45. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aïn, Syrina Al, Poupon, Daphnée, Hétu, Sébastien, Mercier, Noémie, Steffener, Jason & Frasnelli, Johannes. 2019. Smell training improves olfactory function and alters brain structure. NeuroImage 189: 45–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Pardeshi, Prashant. 2019. Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature 16]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aschmann, Herman P. 1946. Totonac categories of smell. Tlalocan 2: 187–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badyda, Ewa. 2013. ‘‘Upadły anioł zmysłów”? Metaforyka zapachu i percepcji węchowej we współczesnej polszczyźnie (“Fallen Angel of the Senses”? Imagery of Smell and Olfactory Perception in the Contemporary Polish). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Google Scholar
Barkat-Defradas, Melissa & Motte-Florac, Elisabeth (eds). 2016. Words for Odours. Language Skills and Cultural Insights. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger & Longtau, Selbut R. 1995. Tarok ophresiology: An investigation into the Tarok terminology of odours. In Issues in African Languages and Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Kay Williamson, E. ’Nolue Emenanjo & Ozo-mekuri Ndimele (eds), 340–344. Aba: Ninlan.Google Scholar
Boisson, Claude. 1997. La dénomination des odeurs: Variations et régularités linguistiques. Intellectica 24(1): 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bugajski, Marian. 2004. Jak pachnie rezeda. Lingwistyczne studium zapachów (How Mignonette Smells. Linguistic Study of Smells). Wrocław: Atut.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Majid, Asifa. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses and Society 6(1): 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bushdid, Caroline, Magnasco, Marcelo O., Vosshall, Leslie B. & Keller, Asaf. 2014. Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. Science 343(6177): 1370–1372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, William S. 2012. History of research on smell. In Handbook of Perception, Vol. VIa: Tasting and Smelling, Edward C. Carterette & Morton P. Friedman (eds), 197–229. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, David. 1973. A note on the abstract readings of verbs of perception. Cognition 2(3): 269–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casillas, Marisa, Rafiee, Afrooz & Majid, Asifa. 2019. Iranian herbalists, but not cooks, are better at naming odors than laypeople. Cognitive Science 43(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caspers, Barbara A., Hoffman, Joseph I., Kohlmeier, Philip, Krüger, Oliver & Krause, E. Tobias. 2013. Olfactory imprinting as a mechanism for nest odour recognition in zebra finches. Animal Behavior 86(1): 85–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance, Howes, David & Synnott, Anthony. 1994. Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 1990. Thinking is seeing: Visual metaphors and the nature of abstract thought. Semiotica 80(3–4): 221–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Sousa, Hilário. 2011. Changes in the language of perception in Cantonese. Senses & Society 6(1): 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Digonnet, Rémi. 2016. Métaphore et olfaction: Une approche cognitive [Bibliothèque de Grammaire et de Linguistique 48]. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
Doty, Richard L. & Tekeli, Hakan. 2012. Olfactory function in Parkinson’s disease. In Olfactory Cognition. From Perception and Memory to Environmental Odours and Neuroscience [Advances in Consciousness Research 85], Gesualdo M. Zucco, Rachel S. Herz & Benoist Schaal (eds), 155–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupire, Marguerite. 1987. Des goûts et des odeurs: Classifications et universaux. L’Homme 27: 5–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dziwirek, Katarzyna. 2016. Smell in Polish: Lexical semantics and cultural values. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 24(2): 273–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enríquez Andrade, Héctor Manuel. 2004. La categorización de los olores en totonaco. Dimensión Antropológica 30: 103–128.Google Scholar
. 2010. La denominación translingüística de los olores. Dimensión Antropológica 50: 133–183.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2019. Sniffing the boundaries: The limits and challenges of documenting smell terms in Australian languages. Talk delivered at the 60th birthday celebration of Nikolaus Himmelmann at the University of Cologne.
Evans, Nicholas & Wilkins, David. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, San Roque, Lila & Majid, Asifa. 2018. Smell is coded in grammar and frequent in discourse: Cha’palaa olfactory language in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28(2): 175–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor. 2018. Where do evidentials come from? In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 124–147. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, E. Bruce. 2014. Sensation and Perception. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Gómez, Gale Goodwin & van der Voort, Hein. 2014. Reduplication in Indigenous Languages of South America [Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 7]. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata. 1990. Geneza i współczesne funkcje konstrukcji z bezokolicznikami: czuć, słychać, widać, znać, stać (The genesis and functions of infinitive constructions with czuć, słychać, widać, znać, stać in Modern Polish). Poradnik Językowy 8(1): 564–571.Google Scholar
. 2012. Określenia percepcji węchowej w języku polskim (Describing olfactory perception in Polish). In Świat widziany poprzez słowa. Szkice z semantyki leksykalnej, Renata Grzegorczykowa & Agnieszka Mikołajczuk (eds), 160–168. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Harm, Volker. 2000. Regularitäten des semantischen Wandels bei Wahrnehmungsverben des Deutschen [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik: Beihefte 110]. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie. 1992. Terminologie des odeurs dans quelques langues du Gabon. Pholia 7: 61–65.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 1996. Semantic extensions in the sense of smell. Anuario del Seminario de Filología´ Vasca ”Julio de Urquijo” XXX(2): 631–643.Google Scholar
. 1997. Smelling and perception: A cross-linguistic study. Cuadernos de Filología´ Inglesa 612: 113–121.Google Scholar
. 1999a. Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 175], Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. & Gerard J. Steen (eds), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999b. Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: A Cross-Linguistic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
. 2013. The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In Sensuous Cognition. Explorations into Human Sentience: Imagination, (E)motion and Perception [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 22], Rosario Caballero & Javier E. Díaz Vera (eds), 109–133. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics. Scope, motivation, and lexicalization. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19], Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (eds), 43–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Joshua Conrad, Watts, Joseph, Henry, Teague R., List, Johann-Mattis, Forkel, Robert, Mucha, Peter J., Greenhill, Simon J., Gray, Russell D. & Russell D. Lindquist, Russell D. 2019. Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure. Science 366(6472), 1517–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jalava, Lotta. 2017. Grammaticalization of modality and evidentiality in Tundra Nenets. In The Grammaticalization of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality: A Functional Perspective [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 311], Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds), 133–162. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, Fredrik U. & Olsson, Mats J. 2012. Knowing what we smell. In Olfactory Cognition. From Perception and Memory to Environmental Odours and Neuroscience [Advances in Consciousness Research 85], Gesualdo M. Zucco, Rachel S. Herz & Benoist Schaal (eds), 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, Fredrik U., Tchekhova, Antoinette, Lönner, Pär & Olsson, Mats J. 2005. A metamemory perspective on odor naming and identification. Chemical Senses 30(4): 353–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul, Berlin, Brent & Maffi, Luisa. 2011. The World Color Survey. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Regier, Terry. 2003. Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(15): 9085–9089. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (ed.). 2015. The Linguistics of Temperature [Typological Studies in Language 107]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Vanhove, Martine & Koch, Peter. 2007. Typological approaches to lexical semantics. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2019. Perception and metaphor: The case of smell. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19], Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (eds), 327–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krawczyk, Elizabeth A. 2012. Inferred Propositions and the Expression of the Evidence Relation in Natural Language. Evidentiality in Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo and English. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
Krifka, Manfred. 2010. A note on an asymmetry in the hedonic implicatures of olfactory and gustatory terms. In Between the Regular and the Particular in Speech and Language, Susanne Fuchs, Philip Hoole, Christine Mooshammer & Marzena Żygis (eds), 235–245. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krist, Sabine & Grießer, Wilfrid. 2006. Die Erforschung der chemischen Sinne. Geruchs- und Geschmackstheorien von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kutzelnigg, Artur. 1984. Die Verarmung des Geruchswortschatzes seit dem Mittelalter. Muttersprache 94: 328–345.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 359–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Amy Pei-jung. 2007. A Typological Study on Reduplication in Formosan Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
. 2010. Reduplication and odor in four Formosan languages. Language and Linguistics 11(1): 99–126.Google Scholar
. 2015. Lexical categories and conceptualization of olfaction in Amis. Language and Cognition 7(3): 321–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Majid, Asifa. 2014. Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language 29(4): 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa. 2019. Mapping words reveals emotional diversity. Semantic networks reveal cultural variability in emotion. Science 366(6472): 1444–1445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Burenhult, Niclas. 2014. Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition 130(2): 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Kruspe, Nicole. 2018. Hunter-gatherer olfaction is special. Current Biology 28: 409–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makowska, Iwona, Kloszewska, Iwona, Grabowska, Anna, Szatkowska, Iwona & Rymarczyk, Krystyna. 2011. Olfactory deficits in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease in the Polish elderly population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 26(3): 270–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGann, John P. 2017. Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science 356(6338): eaam7263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McHugh, James. 2012. Sandalwood and Carrion: Smell in Indian Religion and Culture. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouélé, Médard. 1997. L’apprentissage des odeurs chez les Waanzi: Note de recherche. Enfance 50: 209–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Hirosi. 2012. The importance of TASTE verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3): 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicola-Antoniu, Iuliana. 2011. Olfactory dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s disease. In The Clinical Spectrum of Alzheimer’s Disease – The Charge toward Comprehensive Diagnostics and Therapeutic Strategies, Suzanne De La Monte (ed.), 127–144. Rijeka: InTech. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordin, Steven. 2012. Olfactory impairment in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. In Olfactory Cognition. From Perception and Memory to Environmental Odours and Neuroscience [Advances in Consciousness Research 85], Gesualdo M. Zucco, Rachel S. Herz & Benoist Schaal (eds), 199–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, Carolyn, Smythe Kungand, Susan & Majid, Asifa. 2019. The challenge of olfactory ideophones: Reconsidering ineffability from the Totonac-Tepehua perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 85(2): 173–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, Carolyn & Majid, Asifa. 2016. How changing lifestyles impact Seri smellscapes and smell language. Anthropological Linguistics 58(2): 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Anger stinks in Seri: Olfactory metaphor in a lesser-described language. Cognitive Linguistics. 31(3): 337–391. DOI logo
Olofsson, Jonas K. & Gottfried, Jay A. 2015. The muted sense: Neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(6): 314–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pandya, Vishvajit. 1987. Above the Forest: A Study of Andamanese Ethnoamenology, Cosmology, and the Power of Ritual. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Pericliev, Vladimir. 2015. On colexification among basic vocabulary. Journal of Universal Language 16(2): 63–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisarkowa, Krystyna. 1972. Szkic pola semantycznego zapachów w polszczyźnie (An outline of the semantic field of smells in Polish). Język Polski LII(5): 330–339.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina & Holz, Peter. (eds), 2007. Speaking of Colors and Odors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulte, William. 1985. The experienced and nonexperienced past in Cherokee. International Journal of American Linguistics 51(4): 543–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reznikova, Tatiana, Rakhilina, Ekaterina & Bonch-Osmolovskaya, Anastasia. 2012. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3): 421–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rzymski, Christoph, Tresoldi, Tiago, Greenhill, Simon J., Wu, Mei-Shin, Schweikhard, Nathanael E., Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Gast, Volker, Bodt, Timotheus A., Hantgan, Abbie, Kaiping, Gereon A., Chang, Sophie, Lai, Yunfan, Morozova, Natalia, Arjava, Heini, Hübler, Nataliia, Koile, Ezequiel, Pepper, Steve, Proos, Mariann, Van Epps, Briana, Blanco, Ingrid, Hundt, Carolin, Monakhov, Sergei, Pianykh, Kristina, Ramesh, Sallona, Gray, Russell D., Forkel, Robert & List, Johann-Mattis. 2019. The Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, Reproducible Analysis of Cross-linguistic Polysemies. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila, Kendrick, Kobin H., Norcliffe, Elisabeth, Brown, Penelope, Defina, Rebecca, Dingemanse, Mark, Dirksmeyer, Tyko, Enfield, Nicolas J., Floyd, Simeon, Hammond, Jeremy, Rossi, Giovanni, Tufvesson, Sylvia, van Putten, Saskia & Majid, Asifa. 2015. Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1): 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Kendrick, Kobin H., Norcliffe, Elisabeth & Majid, Asifa. 2018. Universal meaning extensions of perception verbs are grounded in interaction. Cognitive Linguistics 29(3): 371–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette. 2019. The ethno-linguistic relationship between smelling and kissing: A Southeast Asian case study. Oceanic Linguistics 58(1): 92–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorokowska, Agnieszka, Sorokowski, Piotr, Hummel, Thomas & Huanca, Thomas. 2013. Olfaction and environment: Tsimane’ of Bolivian rainforest have lower threshold of odor detection than industrialized German people. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staniewski, Przemysław. 2016. Das Unantastbare beschreiben. Gerüche und ihre Ver-sprach-li-chung im Deutschen und Polnischen [Warschauer Studien zur Germanistik und zur Angewandten Linguistik 25]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2018. Olfaktorischer Wortschatz und dessen invektives Potenzial – Eine exemplarische Korpusanalyse. In Sprachliche Gewalt. Formen und Effekte von Pejorisierung, verbaler Aggression und Hassrede, Fabian Klinker, Joachim Scharloth & Joanna Szczęk (eds), 135–153. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin Eldon. 2008. The scent of language and social synaesthesia at Rome. Classical World 101(2): 159–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Smell and sociocultural value judgment in Catullus. Classical World 109(4): 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, Anne. 2004. Haptische, visuelle und olfaktorische Sprachen: Westnilotische Wahrnehmungen. Afrikanisitik Aegyptologie Online. <[URL]> (31 August 2020).
. 2013. Knowing, smelling and telling tales in Luwo. In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture [Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture 3], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds), 47–68. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. A Grammar of Luwo. An Anthropological Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, Anne & Vossen, Rainer. 2007. Odours and colours in Nilotic: Comparative case studies. In Advances in Nilo-Saharan Linguistics: Proceedings of the 8th Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, University of Hamburg, August 22-25, 2001 [Nilo-Saharan 22], Doris L. Payne & Mechthild Reh (eds), 223–240. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca. 2015. Synaesthetia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Functions of Language 22(1): 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca & Winter, Bodo. 2018. Sensory language across lexical categories. Lingua 204(1): 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urban, Matthias. 2012. Analyzability and Semantic Associations in Referring Expressions: A Study in Comparative Lexicology. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1992. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2008. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions. A crosslinguistic perspective. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 341–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1983. The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1): 123–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Verbs of perception. In Language Typology and Language Universals [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 20.2], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreich & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1294–1309. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Sensation, perception and cognition. Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language 22(1): 96–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeltz, F.K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 2001. Ideophones [Typological Studies in Language 44]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard J. 2010. Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German [German Linguistic and Cultural Studies 26]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, Ewelina, Laophairoj, Rujiwan & Majid, Asifa. 2020. Smell terms are not rara: A semantic investigation of odor vocabulary in Thai. Linguistics 58(4): 937–966. DOI logo
Wnuk, Ewelina & Majid, Asifa. 2014. Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition 131(1): 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

ÖZKAN KURT, Fatma
2022. Türkiye Türkçesinde Koku Alanını İfade Etme Biçimleri: Eylemler. Akademik Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 6:4 ► pp. 1416 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.