Cover not available
Part of
The Linguistics of Olfaction: Typological and Diachronic Approaches to Synchronic Diversity
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Przemysław Staniewski
[Typological Studies in Language 131] 2021
► pp. 369–402

Smelling over time

The lexicon of olfaction from Latin to Italian

Sensory anthropologists have described societies that, compared to Western ones, attribute to the sense of smell a more prominent cultural role, and linguists are bringing evidence that a higher sociocultural status of smell tends to be reflected in language by a richer and more elaborated olfactory lexicon. Given that the relative prominence of one sense within the sensorium has been shown to vary not only across societies, but also over time, such variation may be expected to have linguistic reflections. This study explores whether and how the olfactory lexicon has changed from Latin to Italian. Is the alleged increased “deodorization” of contemporary Western societies associated with changes in the lexicon? The data show that, contrary to expectations, the overall size of the olfactory lexicon did not undergo appreciable changes. However, it progressively became more oriented toward the negative pole of evaluation (i.e., the expression of unpleasant smells). Implications and possible explanations are discussed in the light of the linguistic and sensory-historical literature.

Keywords: olfactory lexicon, Latin, Italian, diachrony
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Olfaction in culture and language
  • 2.The lexicon of olfaction: Properties and organization
  • 3.Latin
    • 3.1Verbs
    • 3.2Nouns
    • 3.3Adjectives
  • 4.Old Italian
    • 4.1Verbs
    • 4.2Nouns
    • 4.3Adjectives
  • 5.Contemporary Italian
    • 5.1Verbs
    • 5.2Nouns
    • 5.3Adjectives
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
    • 6.1The overall size of the olfactory lexicon did not change
    • 6.2There has been a shift toward the negative pole of evaluation
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • Primary sources (corpora and dictionaries)
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.131.13str
References

Primary sources (corpora and dictionaries)

A Latin Dictionary = Lewis, Charlton. T. & Short, Charles. (eds) 1958  A Latin Dictionary . Oxford: Clarendon Press (1st edn. 1879).Google Scholar
Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages = de Vaan, Michiel 2008  Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages . Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Grande Dizionario della Lingua Italiana (GDLI)  = Battaglia, Salvatore. (ed.) 1961–2002  Grande Dizionario della Lingua Italiana . Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
ItTenTen corpus
[URL] (12 January 2021)
Lexicon totius latinitatis = Forcellini, Egidio, Furlanetto, Giuseppe, Corradini, Francesco & Perin, Giuseppe. (eds) 1940  Lexicon totius latinitatis . Padova: Typis Seminari (1st edn. 1864–1887).Google Scholar
Lo Zingarelli Cannella, Mario & Lazzarini, Beata (eds) Lo Zingarelli 2017. Vocabolario della lingua italiana Bologna Zanichelli
OVI Corpus OVI (Opera del Vocabolario Italiano) dell’italiano antico . [URL] (12 January 2021).
Oxford Latin Dictionary = Glare, Peter (ed.) 1968–1982  Oxford Latin Dictionary . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sabatini-Coletti = Sabatini, Francesco & Coletti, Vittorio 2008  Dizionario della lingua italiana . Milano: Rizzoli Larousse.Google Scholar
Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini (TLIO)
[URL] (12 January 2021).
Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (TTL)
online version. [URL] (12 January 2021).
Tommaseo-Bellini = Tommaseo, Nicolò & Bellini, Bernardo 1861–1879  Dizionario della lingua italiana . Torino: Società l’Unione tipografico-editrice.Google Scholar
Vocabolario degli Accademici della Crusca
1612 <[URL] (12 January 2021).
Vocabolario della lingua latina = Castiglioni, Luigi & Mariotti, Scevola 1996  Vocabolario della lingua latina . Torino: Loescher (1st edn. 1966).Google Scholar
Alač, Morana
2017 We like to talk about smell: A worldly take on language, sensory experience, and the Internet. Semiotica 215: 143–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith & Burridge, Kate
2006 Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Kate
2015 Odor in Roman Literature. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Aschmann, Herman P.
1946 Totonac categories of smell. Tlalocan 2(2): 187–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batty, Clare
2015 Olfactory objects. In Perception and its Modalities, Dustin Stokes, Mohan Matthen & Stephen Biggs (eds), 222–246. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, Friedrich
1879 Über die Bezeichnungen der sinnlichen Wahrnehmungen in den indogermanischen Sprachen. Ein Beitrag zur Bedeutungsgeschichte. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Kay, Paul
1969 Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Betts, Eleanor
2017 Senses of the Empire: Multisensory Approaches to Roman Culture. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boisson, Claude
1997 La dénomination des odeurs: Variations et régularités linguistiques. Intellectica 24(1): 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Mark
(ed.) 2015 Smell and the Ancient Senses. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015 Introduction: Smell and the ancient senses. In Smell and the Ancient Senses, Mark Bradley (ed.), 1–16. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1949 A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Majid, Asifa
2011 Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses & Society 6(1): 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burridge, Kate & Benczes, Réka
2019 Taboo as a driver of language change. In The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, Keith Allan (ed.), 180–198. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candau, Joël
2016 Foreword. In Words for Odours: Language Skills and Cultural Insights, Melissa Barkat-Defradas & Elisabeth Motte-Florac (eds), xiii–xxi. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance, Howes, David & Synnott, Anthony
1994 Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Classen, Constance
1993 Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1999 Other ways to wisdom: Learning through the senses across cultures. International Review of Education 45(3–4): 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbin, Alain
1982 Le miasme et la jonquille. L’odorat et l’imaginaire social, XVIIIe-XIXe siècles. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar
Cornford, Francis MacDonald
1997 Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. Indianapolis IN: Hackett. (1st edn 1935, Routledge).Google Scholar
Croijmans, Ilja & Majid, Asifa
2016 Not all flavor expertise is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0155845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi & Haverling, Gerd
2009 Syntax, sociolinguistics, and literary genres. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax: Syntax of the Sentence [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 180(1)], Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19–64. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, Hilário
2011 Changes in the language of perception in Cantonese. Senses & Society 6(1): 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Digonnet, Rémi
2016 Métaphore et olfaction: Une approche cognitive. Paris: Honoré Champion Editions.Google Scholar
Dubois, Danièle
2000 Categories as acts of meaning: The case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cognitive Science Quarterly 1: 35–68.Google Scholar
2007 From psychophysics to semiophysics: Categories as acts of meaning. A case study from olfaction and audition, back to colors. In Speaking of Colors and Odors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 8], Martina Plümacher & Peter Holz (eds), 167–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrlichman, Howard & Bastone, Linda
1992 Olfaction and emotion. In Science of Olfaction, Michael J. Serby & Karen L. Chobor (eds), 410–438. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engen, Trygg
1982 The Perception of Odors. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Wilkins, David
2000 In the mind’s ear: The semantic extension of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabbian, Maria Chiara
2012 Naso d’autore. L’odorato nella cultura e nella storia letteraria italiana (Auteur Nose. Olfaction in Italian Culture and Literary History). Ravenna: Longo Editore.Google Scholar
Floyd, Simeon, San Roque, Lila & Majid, Asifa
2018 Smell is coded in grammar and frequent in discourse: Cha’palaa olfactory language in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 28(2): 175–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre
2008 Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio
1980 Su alcune costruzioni “pseudorelative” (On some “pseudo-relative” constructions). Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 5: 117–139.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1993 Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook
2006 Scenting Salvation: Ancient Christianity and the Olfactory Imagination. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henshaw, Victoria, McLean, Kate, Medway, Dominic, Perkins, Chris & Warnaby, Gary
2018 Designing with Smell: Practices, Techniques and Challenges. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Mouélé, Médard, Rouby, Catherine, Schaal, Benoît & Sicard, Gilles
2016 Basic odour terms in Li-Wanzi (a Bantu language spoken in Gabon): An experimental approach. In Words for Odours: Language Skills and Cultural Insights, Melissa Barkat-Defradas & Elisabeth Motte-Florac (eds), 135–146. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Howes, David
1986 Le sens sans parole: Vers une anthropologie de l’odorat. Anthropologie et Sociétés 10(3): 29–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Senses and Sensation. Critical and Primary Sources, Vol. 2: History and Sociology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Ibarrexte-Antuñano, Iraide
1996 Semantic extensions in the sense of smell. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca ‘Julio de Urquijo’ 30(2): 631–643.Google Scholar
1999 Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 175], Raymond W. GibbsJr. & Gerard J. Steen (eds), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubíček, Miloš, Kilgarriff, Adam, Kovář, Vojtěch, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vit
2013 The TenTen Corpus Family. In 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, 125–127Lancaster.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
2014 The Language of Food: A Linguist Reads the Menu. New York NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Jütte, Robert
2005 A History of the Senses. From Antiquity to Cyberspace. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Andreas
2017 Philosophy of Olfactory Perception. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges & Vuillaume, Marcel
2011 Pour une linguistique des odeurs: Présentation. Langages 181: 3–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenen, Mieke
1997 Lucretius’ olfactory theory in De rerum natura IV . In Lucretius and his Intellectual Background, Keimpe A. Algra, Mieke H. Koenen & Pieter H. Schrijvers (eds), 163–177. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Adademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2019 Perception and metaphor: The case of smell. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19], Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (eds). 327–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutzelnigg, Artur
1984 Die Verarmung des Geruchswortschatzes seit dem Mittelalter. Muttersprache 94: 328–345.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2010  A note on an asymmetry in the hedonic implicatures of olfactory and gustatory terms. In Between the Regular and the Particular in Speech and Language, Susanne Fuchs, Philip Hoole, Christine Mooshammer & Marzena Żygis (eds), 235–245. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lee, Amy Pei-Jung
2015 Lexical categories and conceptualization of olfaction in Amis. Language and Cognition 7(3): 321–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lilja, Saara
1972 The Treatment of Odours in the Poetry of Antiquity. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Luján, Eugenio R
2010 Semantic change. In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 286–310. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
1995 A Linguistic History of Italian. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa & Burenhult, Niclas
2014 Odors are expressible in language, as long as you speak the right language. Cognition 130(2): 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Senft, Gunter & Levinson, Stephen C.
2007 The language of olfaction. In Field manual, Volume 10, Asifa Majid (ed.), 36–41. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Majid, Asifa
2015 Cultural factors shape olfactory language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(11): 629–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medjo Mvé, Pither
2016 Basic odour vocabulary in two Fang varieties (Gabon): A language diversity-based approach. In Words for Odours: Language Skills and Cultural Insights, Melissa Barkat-Defradas & Elisabeth Motte-Florac (eds), 189–208. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Migliorini, Bruno
1960 Storia della lingua italiana (History of the Italian language). Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Moeran, Brian
2011 The colours of smell: Perfume advertising and the senses. Paper presented at The American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting 2011, Montreal, Canada [URL] (12 January 2021).
Monopoli, Davide & Cacciari, Cristina
2009 Il linguaggio letterale e figurato nelle descrizioni dell’esperienza sensoriale: l’olfatto è davvero un senso “senza parole”? (Literal and figurative language in sensory experience descriptions: Is olfaction really a sense “without words?), Paradigmi XXVII (1): 147–162.Google Scholar
Mouélé, Médard
1997  L’apprentissage des odeurs chez les Wanzi: Note de recherche. Enfance 50: 209–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, Carolyn & Majid, Asifa
2016 How changing lifestyles impact Seri smellscapes and smell language. Anthropological Linguistiscs 58(2): 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Anger stinks in Seri: Olfactory metaphor in a lesser-described language. Cognitive Linguistics 31(3): 367–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, David S.
1999 Odor and power in the Roman Empire. In Constructions of the Classical Body, James I. Porter (ed.), 169–189. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo
1985 Review of Butterworth, B., Comrie, B. & Dahl, Ö., Explanations for Language Universals. Lingua 66: 375–387.Google Scholar
Rindisbacher, Hans J.
2015 What’s this smell? Shifting worlds of olfactory perception. KulturPoetik 15(1): 70–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Lorenzo, Renzi
(eds) 2010 Grammatica dell’italiano antico (Old Italian grammar). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Shmelev, Alexei
2016 Semantic shifts as sources of enantiosemy. In The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 67–93. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skytte, Gunver
1976  L’analisi dei costrutti infinitivi con i verbi fattitivi e i verbi di percezione (Analysis of infinitive constructs with factitive and perception verbs). ACISc 2: 87–94.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark M.
2007 Producing sense, consuming sense, making sense: Perils and prospects for sensory history. Journal of Social History 40(4): 841–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spaeth, John W.
1922 Martial and Morley on smells. Classical World 16(6): 46–47.Google Scholar
Squillace, Giuseppe
2010 Il profumo nel mondo antico. Con la prima traduzione italiana del “Sugli odori” di Teofrasto (The Fragrance of the Ancient World. With the First Italian Translation of Theophrastus’ “On odours”). Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Staniewski, Przemysław
2016 Das Unantastbare beschreiben: Gerüche und ihre Versprachlichung im Deutschen und Polnischen [Warschauer Studien zur Germanistik und zur Angewandten Linguistik 25]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017  Geschmack und smak – sprachliche Aspekte der gustatorischen Wahrnehmung im Deutschen und Polnischen. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung, Sonderheft 25: 223–247.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin Eldon
2008 The scent of language and social synaesthesia at Rome. Classical World 101(2): 159–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Smell and sociocultural value judgment in Catullus. Classical World 109(4): 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2007 Italian perception verbs. A corpus-based study. In Language Resources and Linguistic Theory, Andrea Sansò (ed.), 167–179. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
2015 Synaesthesia: A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality. Functions of language 22(1): 69–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca & Winter, Bodo
2018 Sensory language across lexical categories. Lingua 204: 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca & De Felice, Irene
2019 Metaphors and perception in the lexicon: A diachronic perspective. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 19], Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (eds), 85–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strudsholm, Erling
1995 Relativa predicativa o pseudorelativa. Considerazioni sintattiche, semantiche e pragmatiche (Predicative relative or pseudo-relative. Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic considerations). In La subordination dans les langues romanes (Subordination in the Romance Languages), Hanne Leth Andersen & Gunver Skytte (eds), 163–179. Kopenhagen: Université de Copenhague.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toner, Jerry
2015 Smell and Christianity. In Smell and the Ancient Senses, Mark Bradley (ed.), 158–170. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
1984 The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1): 123–162.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Verbs of perception. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. II ., Martin Haspelmath, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1294–1309. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke
2015 Sensation, perception and cognition. Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language 22(1): 96–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Phenomenon-based perception verbs in Swedish from a typological and contrastive perspective. Syntaxe & Sémantique 20: 17–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wawrzyniak, Sandra
2016 Kunuka kama... or on the Swahili perception of smells. In Words for Odours: Language Skills and Cultural Insights, Melissa Barkat-Defradas & Elisabeth Motte-Florac (eds), 147–166. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo
2016 Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31(8): 975–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wnuk, Ewelina, Laophairoj, Rujiwan & Majid, Asifa
2020 Smell terms are not rara: A semantic investigation of odor vocabulary in Thai. Linguistics 58(4), 937–966. DOI logoGoogle Scholar