This chapter presents a typological description of the semantic domains empty and full. While the majority of other predicates of physical qualities have a single argument (the qualified object), the situations of fullness and emptiness imply two arguments – the container and the contents. Such argument structure influences the syntax of the predicates of fullness and emptiness and, to some extent, the oppositions within these domains. In this paper, empty and full are examined in relation to clean, bare, solid and several other adjacent semantic domains, with particular attention being given to metaphors and semantic extensions.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.2003. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
Georgakopoulos, Th. & Polis, S.2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(2): 1–33.
Grady, J.2007. Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts, H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics: 187–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, B.1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herskovits, A.1986. Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kustova, G. I.2006. Valentnosti i konstrukcii prilagatel’nyx [Arguments and constructions of adjectives]. In Komp’juternaja lingvistika i intellektual’nye tehnologii. Trudy meždunarodnoj konferencii “Dialog-2006” [Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the International Conference “Dialog-2006”], 323–328. Moscow: RGGU.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rakhilina, E. V.2007. Tipy metaforičeskix upotreblenij glagolov plavanija [Types of metaphorical uses of aqua-motion verbs]. In Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [Verbs of AQUA-Motion: Lexical Typology], T. A. Maisak & E. V. Rakhilina (eds), 76–105. Moscow: Indrik.
Tagabileva, M. & Kholkina, L.2010. Kačestvennye priznaki ‘pustoj’ i ‘polnyj’ v tipologičeskom osveščenii [Qualities ‘full’ and ‘empty’ in typological perspective]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 4(3): 167–169.
Tagabileva, M., Kholkina, L. & Kiryanov, D.2013. Semantic domains ‘full’ and ‘empty’: a cross-linguistic study. In Association for Linguistic Typology. The 10th Biennal Conference (Leipzig, 2013 August 15–18). Abstracts, 178–179. <[URL]>
Taylor, J.1989. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tolstaya, S. M.2008. Prostranstvo slova. Leksičeskaja semantika v obščeslavjanskoj perspektive [Extent of a Word. Lexical Semantics in a General Slavic Perspective]. Moscow: Indrik.
Vandeloise, C.1991. Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago.
Vandeloise, C.1994. Methodology and analyses of the preposition. Cognitive Linguistics 5(2): 157–184.
Sources
BCCWJ – The Balanced Corpus of Contemporary Written Japanese, <[URL]>
BCS – Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian. A Textbook. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2010.
CCL – Peking University CCL Online Corpus, <[URL]>
2022. Lexical typology and semantic maps: Perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1 ► pp. 231 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.