The paper deals with the typology of surface texture expressions, such as slippery road, smooth wooden board, rough hands, coarse or rough fabric. We discuss both their literal uses and metaphors formed with them, such as slippery person, smooth speech, rugged captain. Our language sample includes 10 Uralic languages (Finnish, Estonian, Meadow Mari, Erzya, Moksha, Udmurt, Komi-Zyrjan, Hungarian, Khanty, Nenets), as well as 5 languages from other families (Russian, English, Spanish, Chinese, and Korean). The categorisation includes primarily a division into visually perceived surfaces and surfaces perceived through physical contact. We discuss in what ways the antonymic areas under observation are asymmetrical in their semantics and combinability. One more focus is on evaluating variation in the texture lexicon in genetically related languages in comparison with its variation across a broader sample of languages.
1974Leksičeskaja semantika. Sinonimičeskie sredstva jazyka [Lexical Semantics. Synonymic Tools of Language] Moscow: Nauka.
Bakker, D.
2010Language sampling. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, J. J. Song (ed), 100–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bons, I.
2009Polysemie und Distribution Zur Theorie und Methode einer korpusbasierten Semantik deutscher Adjektive. Gießen: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek.
Croft, W.
1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, W. & Cruse, D.
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D.
1986Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Djurovič, L.
2000Soblazn rodstva (o značenii leksem v rodstvennyh jazykah) [Temptation of relatedness (on the meanings of lexemes in genetically related languages)] In Slovo v tekste i slovare. Sb. statej k 70-letiju akad. Ju.D. Apresjana [A Word in a Text and in a Dictionary. To the 70-th Anniversary of Ju.D. Apresjan], L. L. Iomdin & L. P. Krysin (eds), 77–81. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kultury.
Dobrovol’skij, D. O. & Levontina, I. B.
2012O sinonimii fokusirujuščih častic (na materiale nemeckogo i russkogo jazykov) [Synonymous focus particles in German and Russian]. In Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dialogue” -2012, 138–149. Moscow: RGGU.
2006Indoeuropeans and Altaians through the Linguistic Reconstruction. In Kinship in the Altaic World. Proceedings of the 48th PIAC, E. V. Boykova & R. R. Rybakov (eds), 88–102. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Haspelmath, M.
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, M. Tomasello (ed), 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Ivanova, E. Yu.
2011Netrivial’nye svojstva poverhnostej kak topologičeskih ob’’ektov: materialy k leksičeskoj tipologii (russkie i korejskie prilagatel’nye) [Non-trivial properties of surfaces as topological objects: data for lexical typology (Russian and Korean adjectives)]. MA thesis, Russian State University for the Humanities.
Kashkin, E. V.
2011aPrilagatel’nye, opisyvajuščie svojstva poverhnostej, v ižemskom dialekte komi-zyrjanskogo jazyka (sopostavitel’no-tipologičeskoe issledovanie) [Adjectives denoting surface texture in Izhma Komi: a cross-linguistic perspective]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitan VII(3): 302–307.
Kashkin, E. V.
2011bNa puti k kompjuternomu analizu i sintezu semantiki: opyt issledovanija erzjanskih i udmurtskih prilagatel’nyh, opisyvajuščih fakturu poverhnostej [Towards a computational semantic analysis and synthesis: some remarks on Erzya and Udmurt adjectives of surface texture]. In Problemy kompjuternoj lingvistiki [Issues in Computational Linguistics], Vol. 5, A. A. Kretov (ed.), 137–153. Voronezh: Voronezh State University.
Kashkin, E. V.
2012Kategorizacija faktury poverhnostej v zapadnyh govorah hantyjskogo jazyka: sopostavitel’no-tipologičeskoe issledovanie [The categorisation of surface texture in Western Khanty: a cross-linguistic perspective]. Ural-Altaic Studies 2(7): 26–38.
Kashkin, E. V.
2013aJazykovaja kategorizatsija faktury poverhnostej (tipologičeskoe issledovanie naimenovanij kačestvennyh priznakov v ural’skih jazykah) [Language categorisation of surface texture (a cross-linguistic study of quality expressions in Uralic languages)]. Candidate’s dissertation in philology, Moscow State University.
Kashkin, E. V.
2013bK leksičeskoj tipologii priznakovyh slov, opisyvajuščih fakturu poverhnostej: dannye vengerskogo jazyka [Towards a lexical typology of quality expressions denoting surface texture: evidence from Hungarian]. In Problemy leksiko-semantičeskoj tipologii [Issues in Lexico-Semantic Typology], Vol. 2, A. A. Kretov (ed), 113–140. Voronezh: Voronezh State University.
Kholkina, L. S.
2014Kačestvennye priznaki v kitajskoj leksike: opyt tipologičeskogo opisanija [Qualitative concepts in Chinese vocabulary: a typological description]. Candidate’s dissertation in philology. Moscow, Moscow State University.
Kibrik, A. E.
1998Does intragenetic typology make sense? In Sprache in Raum und Zeit: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenshaft, W. Boeder, Ch. Schroeder, K. H. Wagner & W. Wildgen (eds), 61–68. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Kibrik, A. E.
2003Rodstvennye jazyki kak ob’’ekt tipologii [Genetically related languages as an object of typology] In Konstanty i peremennye jazyka [Constants and Variables of Language], A. E. Kibrik, 191–195. St. Petersburg: Aleteya.
Kibrik, A. E.
2009In defence of intragenetic typology: evidence from clause coordination in Daghestanian languages. In Abstracts of the Eighth Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, [URL]> (1October 2019).
1991The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
Koshkareva, N. B., Kashkin, E. V., Koryakov, Yu. B., Kazakevich, O. A., Burkova, S. I., Muravyev, N. A. & Budyanskaya, E. M.
2017Dialektologičeskij atlas ural’skih jazykov, rasprostranennyh na territorii Jamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Dialectological Atlas of the Uralic Languages Spoken in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District]. Kaliningrad: ROS-DOAFK.
2014Differential ineffability and the senses. Mind & Language 29: 407–427.
Luchina, E. S., Reznikova, T. I. & Stenin, I. A.
2013Atributivy kak istočnik grammatikalizacii: ‘prjamoj’ i ‘rovnyj’ v russkom, nemeckom i finskom jazykah [Attributives as a source of grammaticalization: ‘straight’ and ‘level’ in Russian, German and Finnish]. In Tipología léxica, R. Guzmán Tirado & I. Votyakova (eds), 123–129. Granada: Jizo Ediciones.
Majid, A., Gullberg, M., van Staden, M. & Bowerman, M.
2007How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2): 179–194.
Majid, A., Levinson, S. C.
(eds)2011The senses in language and culture. The Senses & Society 6(1): 5–18.
Majid, A., Jordan, F. & Dunn, M.
2015Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49: 1–18.
Rakhilina, E. V. & Prokofieva, I. A.
2004Rodstvennye jazyki kak ob’’ekt leksičeskoj tipologii: russkie i pol’skie glagoly vraščenija [Genetically related languages as an object of lexical typology: Russian and Polish verbs of rotation]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1: 60–78.
Rakhilina, E. V. & Prokofieva, I. A.
2005Russkie i pol’skie glagoly kolebatel’nogo dviženija: semantika i tipologija [Russian and Polish verbs of oscillation: semantics and typology]. In Jazyk. Ličnost’. Tekst. Sb. k 70-letiju T.M. Nikolaevoj [Language. Personality. Text. To the 70th anniversary of T.M. Nikolaeva], V. N. Toporov (ed), 304–314. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskih kul’tur.
Spesivceva, A. A.
2012Semantika prilagatel’nyh, opisyvajuščih kačestva poverhnosti, i prilagatel’nyh so značeniem “pustoj” i “polnyj” (na materiale ispanskogo jazyka) [The semantics of adjectives denoting surface properties and adjectives ‘full’ – ‘empty’ (evidence from Spanish)]. MA thesis, Moscow, Russian State University for Humanities.
Traugott, E.
2006The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. In The handbook of the history of English, A. van Kemenade, B. Los (eds), 335–359. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Viberg, A.
1983The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study. Linguistics 21(1): 123–162.
Vinogradova, O. I.
2013K leksičeskoj tipologii priznakovyh slov, opisyvajuščih fakturu poverhnostej: dannye anglijskogo jazyka [Towards a lexical typology of surface texture expressions: evidence from English]. In Problemy leksiko-semantičeskoj tipologii [Issues in Lexico-Semantic Typology], A. A. Kretov (ed), 39–72. Voronezh: Voronezh State University.
1992–2000Suomen Sanojen Alkuperä: Etymologinen Sanakirja. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden, Seura: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus.
UEW – Rédei, K.
1988Uralisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Band 1. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
[WALS] – Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M.
(eds)2013The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, [URL]> (27April 2018).
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Bellamy, Kate & Martha Mendoza
2024. The expression of texture in P’urhepecha. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 24 ► pp. e024005 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.