Part of
The Typology of Physical Qualities
Edited by Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova and Daria Ryzhova
[Typological Studies in Language 133] 2022
► pp. 289308
Bellugi, U. & Klima, E. S.
1979Language: perspectives from another modality. In Brain and Mind [Ciba Foundation Series 69], 99–117. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar
Benedicto, E. & Brentari, D.
2004Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of Classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22 (4): 743–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B. & Kay, P.
1969Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F. & Christiansen, M. H.
2016Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(39): 10818–10823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R.
(eds) 2001The Hands are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Brennan, M.
1990Word Formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Press.Google Scholar
2005Conjoining Word and Image in British Sign Language (BSL): An Exploration of Metaphorical Signs in BSL. Sign Language Studies 5 (3): 360–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burkova, S. & Kimmelman, V.
(eds) 2019Vvedenie v linguistiku žestovyx jazykov: Russkiy žestovyj jazyk [Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics: Russian Sign Language]. Novosibirsk: NSTUGoogle Scholar
Cogill-Koez, D.
Emmorey, K. & Herzig, M.
2003Categorical Versus Gradient Properties of Classifier Constructions in ASL. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed), 221–247. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grose, D.
2012Lexical semantics: Semantic fields and lexical aspect. In Sign Language: an International Handbook, R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds), 432–462. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanke, T.
2004HamNoSys – representing sign language data in language resources and language processing contexts. In Workshop Proceedings : Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, O. Streiter & C. Vettori (eds), 1–6. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. & Schembri, A.
2007Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
1980American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, I.
2010Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 86 (4): 865–896. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlman, M., Little, H., Thompson, B. & Thompson, R. L.
2018Iconicity in signed and spoken vocabulary: A comparison between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 132–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. & Vigliocco, G.
2010Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. & Steinbach, M.
2006Pluralization in sign and speech: Across-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10: 135–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, P.
2002Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian sign language. Sign Language Studies 2(3): 296–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, Th. & Henning, J.
1987HamNoSys. Hamburg Notation System for Sign Languages. An Introduction. Hamburg: Zentrum für Deutsche Gebärdensprache.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. & Reznikova, T.
2016A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, P. Juvonen & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 95–130. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagara, K. & Zeshan, U.
2016Semantic fields in sign languages: A comparative typological study. In Semantic Fields in Sign Languages: Colour, Kinship and Quantification [Sign language typology 6], U. Zeshan & K. Sagara (eds), 3–41. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W.
1989Phonological Representation of the Sign Linearity and Nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D.
2001Natural Sign Languages. In Handbook of Linguistics, M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (eds.), 533–562. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, W.
1960Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf [Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Paper No. 8]. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Supalla, T. R.
1986The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization, C. Craig (ed), 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, S. F.
2004Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Vos, C. & Pfau, R.
2015Sign Language Typology: The Contribution of Rural Sign Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, P. P.
2000Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, E.
2009Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico.
Willbur, R.
Woodward, J.
1978All in the family: Kinship lexicalization across sign languages. Sign Language Studies 19: 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U.
(ed) 2006Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, U., Delgado, C. E. E., Dikyuva, H., Panda, S. & de Vos, C.
2013Cardinal numerals in rural sign languages: Approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic typology 17: 357–396.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I.
2003Classifying Hand Configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar