Cover not available
Part of
Caused Accompanied Motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg and Birgit Hellwig
[Typological Studies in Language 134] 2022
► pp. 101–146

The expression of directed caused accompanied motion events in Yurakaré

Semantics, pragmatics, and interactional variability

 | Universität zu Köln
This chapter gives an overview of the expression of directed caused accompanied motion events in Yurakaré (isolate, Bolivia) spoken discourse. Building on previous descriptive work by van Gijn (2005, 2006, 2011b), the chapter sets a focus on discourse frequencies of the relevant constructions, including a detailed analysis of the contributions of semantics and pragmatics to the expression of the four defining meaning components (directedness, causation, accompaniment, motion). In addition, I examine the variability in interactants’ choice of expression when describing the same event, emphasizing different aspects of the event with their choice. I argue that interactional strategies such as self‑ and cross-speaker repetition can explain part of the variability by influencing discourse frequencies.
Keywords: applicatives, associative, comitative, event description, interactional variability, motion verbs, repetition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and method
  • 3.Grammatical background
    • 3.1Expression of non-core arguments
    • 3.2Applicatives
    • 3.3Clause chaining and serialization
  • 4.Expressing (directed) CAM events with the canonical CAM construction
    • 4.1Semantic properties of the construction
    • 4.2Motion verbs used in the construction
    • 4.3Expression of directedness
    • 4.4Encoding of overt goal, source, and path arguments
    • 4.5Properties of agent and theme arguments
  • 5.Alternative expressions
    • 5.1Dependent-marking associative construction
    • 5.2Motion verb with comitative applicative
    • 5.3Motion verb with goal applicative
    • 5.4Motion verb with plural subject
    • 5.5Other cross-linguistically relevant verb types
  • 6.Interactional variability
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.134.05gip
References (20)
References
Barth, D., & Evans, N. (2017). SCOPIC design and overview. Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication, 12, 1–21.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Motivating competitions. In B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov, & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage (pp. 262–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirtzel, V. (2010). Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré (Doctoral dissertation). École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística). (2015). Censo de población y vivienda 2012 Bolivia: Características de la población. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Retrieved from [URL]
Kassambra, A. (2019). Ggpubr: ‘Ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. R package. (Version 0.2.4.). Retrieved from [URL]
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York City, NY: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Plaza Martínez, P., Callapa, C., Frontanilla, A., Guzmán, D., Pinto, L., Ponce, M., Machaca, G., Bruno, R., Yabeta, M., Núñez, M., Nogales, G., & Parada, C. (2011). Historia, lengua, cultura y educación de la Nación Yurakaré. Cochabamba: FUNPROEIB Andes/CEPY.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from [URL]
San Roque, L., Gawne, L., Hoenigman, D., Miller, J. C., Rumsey, A., Spronck, S., Carroll, A., & Evans, N. (2012). Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation and Conservation, 6, 135–174.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, R. (2005). Head marking and dependent marking of grammatical relations in Yurakaré. In M. Amberber & H. de Hoop (Eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case (pp. 41–72). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). A grammar of Yurakaré (Doctoral dissertation). Radboud University Nijmegen. Retrieved from [URL]
(2011a). Semantic and grammatical integration in Yurakaré subordination. In R. van Gijn, K. Haude, & P. Muysken (Eds.), Subordination in native South American languages (pp. 169–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). Subjects and objects: A semantic account of Yurakaré argument structure. International Journal of American Linguistics, 77(4), 595–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, R., Hirtzel, V., Gipper, S., & Ballivián Torrico, J. (2011). The Yurakaré archive. Online language documentation, DobeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. P., & Hill, D. (1995). When ˝go˝ means ˝come˝: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(2–3), 209–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Genoa, Italy. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Pöllänen, Roosa
2024. Sociative causative in South American languages . LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 24 ► pp. e024017 ff. DOI logo
Margetts, Anna, Katharina Haude, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Dagmar Jung, Sonja Riesberg, Stefan Schnell, Frank Seifart, Harriet Sheppard & Claudia Wegener
2022. Cross-linguistic patterns in the lexicalisation of bring and take. Studies in Language 46:4 ► pp. 934 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.