How is conversation like literary discourse? The role of imagery and details in creating involvement

Tannen, Deborah

doi:10.1075/tsl.21.06tan

Part of

The Linguistics of Literacy
Edited by Pamela A. Downing, Susan D. Lima and Michael Noonan
[Typological Studies in Language 21] 1992
► pp. 31–

How is conversation like literary discourse? The role of imagery and details in creating involvement

Deborah Tannen

Published online: 1 July 1992

https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.06tan

Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Order by:

Francis, Norbert

2000. An examination of written expression in bilingual students' ‘non‐academic’ language: assessment of sense of story structure and interlinguistic transfer. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 187 ff.

Kataoka, Kuniyoshi

1997. Affect and letter-writing: Unconventional conventions in casual writing by young Japanese women. Language in Society 26:1 ► pp. 103 ff.

Kataoka, Kuniyoshi

2022. Affect in Japanese women’s letter writing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 427 ff.

Królak, Emilia

2016. Polish nominal construction involving fictive interaction. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 235 ff.

[no author supplied]

2019. A Humanizing Literary Pragmatics [FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures, 10],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.