Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility
Editor
For some time the assumption has been widely held that for a majority of the world's languages, one can identify a “basic” order of subject and object relative to the verb, and that when combined with other facts of the language, the “basic” order constitutes a useful way of typologizing languages. New debate has arisen over varying definitions of “basic”, with investigators encountering languages where branding a particular order of grammatical relations as basic yielded no particular insightfulness. This work asserts that explanatory factors behind word order variation go beyond the syntactic and are to be found in studies of how the mind grammaticizes forms, processes information, and speech act theory considerations of speakers' attempts to get their hearers to build one, rather than another, mental representation of incoming information. Thus three domains must be distinguished in understanding order variation: syntactic, cognitive and pragmatic. The works in this volume explore various aspects of this assertion.
[Typological Studies in Language, 22] 1992. viii, 320 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
IntroductionDoris L. Payne | p. 1
-
Is basic word order universal?Marianne Mithun | p. 15
-
Basic word order in two “free word order” languagesKenneth L. Hale | p. 63
-
The privilege of primacy: experimental data and cognitive explanationsMorton Ann Gernsbacher and David Hargreaves | p. 83
-
Information distribution in OjibwaRussell S. Tomlin and Richard A. Rhodes | p. 117
-
Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in ‘O’odhamDoris L. Payne | p. 137
-
Word order in KlamathKaren Sundberg Meyer | p. 167
-
Word order and topicality in Nez PerceNoel Rude | p. 193
-
Verb-subject order in PolishBarbara Jacennik and Matthew S. Dryer | p. 209
-
The pragmatics of word order variation in Chamorro narrative textAnn Cooreman | p. 243
-
Word order and temporal sequencingJohn Myhill | p. 265
-
Word order and discourse type: an Austronesian exampleJ. Stephen Quakenbush | p. 279
-
On interpreting text-distributional correlations: some methodological issuesT. Givón | p. 305
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
Ebert, Christian, Balthasar Bickel & Paul Widmer
Levshina, Natalia, Savithry Namboodiripad, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Mathew Kramer, Luigi Talamo, Annemarie Verkerk, Sasha Wilmoth, Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez, Timothy Michael Gupton, Evan Kidd, Zoey Liu, Chiara Naccarato, Rachel Nordlinger, Anastasia Panova & Natalia Stoynova
O’Shannessy, Carmel, Amelia Carter & Siva Kalyan
Tal, Shira, Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson, Eitan Grossman & Inbal Arnon
Suitner, Caterina, Anne Maass, Eduardo Navarrete, Magdalena Formanowicz, Boyka Bratanova, Carmen Cervone, Juho Eemeli Hakoköngäs, Toon Kuppens, Eleni Lipourli, Tamara Rakić, Andrea Scatolon, Catia P. Teixeira, Zhenlan Wang, Maria Pedro Sobral & Antonin Carrier
Bettinsoli, Maria Laura, Caterina Suitner & Anne Maass
Otsu, Takahiro
Givón, T.
Owens, Jonathan & Robin Dodsworth
Smith, Marcus
Owens, Jonathan, Robin Dodsworth & Trent Rockwood
Viti, Carlotta
Myhill, John
Tersis, Nicole & Shirley Carter‐Thomas
Fried, Mirjam
Hyönä, Jukka & Heli Hujanen
Abraham, Werner
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General