Kameneva, Veronika, Nadezhda Rabkina & Aleksandra Rumyanceva
2024.
Means of Lexical Cohesion in Oral Speech: Teenagers Operated for Congenital Heart Disease vs. Apparently Healthy Peers.
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences 2024:1
► pp. 33 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria
Lavissière, Mary C. & Malte Rosemeyer
2022.
Reforming the Spanish Future Subjunctive: Linguistics and Legal Language Policy.
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 35:2
► pp. 649 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Raeisi‐Vanani, Amin & Sasan Baleghizadeh
2022.
The contributory role of grammar vs. vocabulary in L2 reading: An SEM approach.
Foreign Language Annals 55:2
► pp. 559 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Zuljan Kumar, Danila
2022.
Strategies for establishing discourse coherence. The case of Slovene dialectal discourse.
Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 30:1
► pp. 51 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Geneviève de Weck
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
Salazar-Orvig, Anne, Geneviève de Weck, Rouba Hassan & Annie Rialland
TAŞÇI, Samet & Ümit Deniz TURAN
2021.
The Contribution of Syntactic and Lexical Knowledge to Foreign Language Reading Comprehension.
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23:1
► pp. 97 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Taşçı, Samet & Ümit Deniz Turan
2021.
The Contribution of Lexical Breadth, Lexical Depth, and Syntactic Knowledge to L2 Reading Comprehension Across Different L2 Reading Proficiency Groups.
English Teaching & Learning 45:2
► pp. 145 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Debreslioska, Sandra & Marianne Gullberg
2020.
What’s New? Gestures Accompany Inferable Rather Than Brand-New Referents in Discourse.
Frontiers in Psychology 11
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Pu, Ming-Ming & Qinghong Pu
Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle & Mihai Dascalu
2019.
The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap.
Behavior Research Methods 51:1
► pp. 14 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
de Weck, Geneviève, Anne Salazar Orvig, Stefano Rezzonico, Élise Vinel & Mélanie Bernasconi
2019.
The impact of the interactional setting on the choice of referring expressions in narratives.
First Language 39:3
► pp. 298 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hůlková, Irena, Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova, Renata Jančaříková & Josef Schmied
2019.
Intercultural variation in academic discourse: Theme zones and the build-up of coherence in research articles.
Topics in Linguistics 20:2
► pp. 33 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
COLLETTA, Jean-Marc, Catherine PELLENQ, Ali HADIAN-CEFIDEKHANIE & Isabelle ROUSSET
2018.
Developmental changes in articulation rate and phonic groups during narration in French children aged four to eleven years.
Journal of Child Language 45:6
► pp. 1337 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Crosthwaite, Peter, Yuk Yeung, Xuefei Bai, Li Lu & Yeonsuk Bae
2018.
DEFINITE DISCOURSE-NEW REFERENCE IN L1 AND L2.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:3
► pp. 625 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kong, Anthony Pak-Hin, Anastasia Linnik, Sam-Po Law & Waisa Wai-Man Shum
2018.
Measuring discourse coherence in anomic aphasia using Rhetorical Structure Theory.
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 20:4
► pp. 406 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Salazar Orvig, Anne, Haydée Marcos, Julien Heurdier & Christine da Silva
Morera, Yurena, José A. León, Inmaculada Escudero & Manuel de Vega
2017.
Do Causal and Concessive Connectives Guide Emotional Expectancies in Comprehension? A Double-Task Paradigm Using Emotional Icons.
Discourse Processes 54:8
► pp. 583 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Aryadoust, Vahid & Purya Baghaei
2016.
Does EFL Readers' Lexical and Grammatical Knowledge Predict Their Reading Ability? Insights From a Perceptron Artificial Neural Network Study.
Educational Assessment 21:2
► pp. 135 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bentein, Klaas
2016.
Verbal Periphrasis in Ancient Greek,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kitajima, Ryu
2016.
Does the Advanced Proficiency Evaluated in Oral‐Like Written Text Support Syntactic Parsing in a Written Academic Text Among L2 Japanese Learners?.
Foreign Language Annals 49:3
► pp. 573 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Roubaud, Marie-Noëlle, Christina Romain, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016.
L’organisation du récit oral chez l’enfant de 3 à 6 ans : une étude comparative.
SHS Web of Conferences 27
► pp. 07015 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Aryadoust, Vahid
2015.
Self- and Peer Assessments of Oral Presentations by First-Year University Students.
Educational Assessment 20:3
► pp. 199 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Aryadoust, Vahid
2016.
Gender and Academic Major Bias in Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations.
Language Assessment Quarterly 13:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Aryadoust, Vahid
2017.
Understanding the Role of Likeability in the Peer Assessments of University Students’ Oral Presentation Skills: A Latent Variable Approach.
Language Assessment Quarterly 14:4
► pp. 398 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Green, Clarence
2015.
An analysis of the relationship between cohesion and clause combination in English discourse employing NLP and data mining approaches.
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30:3
► pp. 326 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kocab, Annemarie, Jennie Pyers & Ann Senghas
2015.
Referential shift in Nicaraguan Sign Language: a transition from lexical to spatial devices.
Frontiers in Psychology 5
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Shibasaki, Hideko, Shingo Tokimoto, Yuichi Ono, Tsugio Inoue & Katsuo Tamaoka
2015.
English Reading Comprehension by Japanese High School Students: Structural Equation Modeling including Working Memory and L1 Literacy.
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:05
► pp. 443 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2013.
The (in)Significance of the Referential-Attributive Distinction. In
Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [
Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1],
► pp. 351 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Momeni, Fereshteh & Shahla Raghibdoust
2012.
The relationship between incoherent speech and different types of delusions and hallucinations in schizophrenics with positive symptoms.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32
► pp. 288 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Smith, Emily R. & Edward J. O’Brien
2012.
Tracking spatial information during reading: a cue-based process.
Memory & Cognition 40:5
► pp. 791 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
ZHANG, DONGBO
2012.
Vocabulary and Grammar Knowledge in Second Language Reading Comprehension: A Structural Equation Modeling Study.
The Modern Language Journal 96:4
► pp. 558 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
EPSTEIN, RICHARD
2011.
The distal demonstrative as discourse marker inBeowulf.
English Language and Linguistics 15:1
► pp. 113 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Netz, Hadar, Zohar Eviatar & Ron Kuzar
2011.
Do Marked Topics Enhance Memory?.
Research in Language 9:2
► pp. 5 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Chui, Kawai
2009.
Conversational coherence and gesture.
Discourse Studies 11:6
► pp. 661 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lemarié, Julie, Robert F. Lorch, Hélène Eyrolle & Jacques Virbel
2008.
SARA: A Text-Based and Reader-Based Theory of Signaling.
Educational Psychologist 43:1
► pp. 27 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Beun, Robbert-Jan & Rogier M. van Eijk
2007.
Dialogue Coherence: A Generation Framework.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16:4
► pp. 365 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
McCarthy, Philip M., Stephen W. Briner, Vasile Rus & Danielle S. McNamara
2007.
Textual Signatures: Identifying Text-Types Using Latent Semantic Analysis to Measure the Cohesion of Text Structures. In
Natural Language Processing and Text Mining,
► pp. 107 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rouba Hassan, Jocelyne Leber-Marin, Haydée Marcos, Aliyah Morgenstern, Jacques Parès & Anne Salazar-Orvig
2006.
Peut-on parler d'anaphore chez le jeune enfant ? Le cas des pronoms de 3e personne.
Langages n° 163:3
► pp. 10 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Le, Elisabeth
2004.
The role of paragraphs in the construction of coherence text linguistics and translation studies.
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 42:3
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ferretti, Todd R., Christina L. Gagné & Ken McRae
2003.
Thematic role focusing by participle inflections: Evidence from conceptual combination..
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29:1
► pp. 118 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kaplan, Robert B & William Grabe
2002.
A modern history of written discourse analysis.
Journal of Second Language Writing 11:3
► pp. 191 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Alistair Knott, Ted Sanders & Jon Oberlander
2002.
Levels of Representation in Discourse Relations.
cogl 12:3
► pp. 197 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Max Louwerse
2002.
An analytic and cognitive parameterization of coherence relations.
cogl 12:3
► pp. 291 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hedtmann, Tatjana
2001.
Zwischen Grundlagenforschung und Anwendung: Texte in der Aphasiologie. In
Sprache, Sinn und Situation,
► pp. 209 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Green, Christopher F, Elsie R Christopher & Jaquelin Lam Kam Mei
2000.
The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: a corpus-based enquiry.
English for Specific Purposes 19:2
► pp. 99 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Habermas, Tilmann & Susan Bluck
2000.
Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence..
Psychological Bulletin 126:5
► pp. 748 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Magliano, Joseph P. & Michelle C. Schleich
2000.
Verb Aspect and Situation Models.
Discourse Processes 29:2
► pp. 83 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Millis, Keith K., Anne King & Hyun-Jeong J. Kim
2000.
Updating Situation Models From Descriptive Texts: A Test of the Situational Operator Model.
Discourse Processes 30:3
► pp. 201 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
van Schalkwyk, P L & W AM Carstens
2000.
PARADOKSE VAN KOHERENSIE.
South African Journal of Linguistics 18:sup37
► pp. 108 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.